he theory of radiative forcing—central to modern climate orthodoxy—rests on assumptions that defy thermodynamic logic and observational reality. By examining Venus’s extreme surface temperatures and comparing them with Earth’s energy budget, this article challenges the notion that greenhouse gases like CO₂ and methane drive planetary warming. Instead, it argues that gravitational gradients, cloud dynamics, and natural variability offer a more coherent explanation. The implications are profound: if radiative forcing fails, then so too does the rationale behind Net Zero policies and the trillion-dollar climate agenda.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/10/venus_and_the_climate_fallacy_why_radiative_forcing_fails.html--------
I've been saying this for 20 years, and I'm not a scientist. This is the biggest fraud of the whole theory, the very crux of the foundation that it builds on, and hardly anyone has called it out.
