Author Topic: Supreme Court Appears Skeptical of Colorado’s ‘Conversion Therapy’ Ban  (Read 135 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64,236
Supreme Court Appears Skeptical of Colorado’s ‘Conversion Therapy’ Ban
Katherine Hamilton
8 Oct 2025
Breitbart
Quote
The Supreme Court on Tuesday heard arguments in a case challenging Colorado’s law mandating an affirmation-only approach for counselors with regards to sexuality and “gender identity.”

Colorado, along with more than 20 other states, has a law banning “conversion therapy” that was passed in 2019. While the law bans archaic and unethical aversion methods historically associated with conversion therapy, like electroshock therapy, it more broadly outlaws “providing professional services for the purpose of attempting to change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity, including attempting to change behaviors or expressions of self or to reduce sexual or romantic attractions or feelings toward individuals of the same gender.  ...

During approximately 90 minutes of oral arguments, the justices appeared skeptical of Colorado’s broadly-worded law and sympathetic to Chiles’ free speech claims, including liberal Justice Elena Kagan.   ...

Offline mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64,236
The Calvin Coolidge Project
@TheCalvinCooli1
🚨Report:  The Supreme Court appears poised to rule against Colorado’s conversion therapy ban
1:26 PM · Oct 8, 2025

Michael Knowles
@michaeljknowles
Of course. All therapy is conversion therapy inasmuch as it seeks to resolve psychological distress by changing ideas and behavior. The current law in Colorado says that psychologists can only convert patients to ideas and behavior approved by left-wing sexual revolutionaries.
2:43 PM · Oct 8, 2025

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,344
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Kagan may join the right side on this one.
7-2 ...

Online jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,965
  • Gender: Male
  • Nonpartisan hack
    • Fullervision
The argument of the alphabet soup lobby is that conversion therapy is inherently ineffective and harmful. That's not how therapies work. Even if certain methods of therapy may fit that mold, that does not mean that all such therapies that now exist or are ever to exist would be inherently bad and worth banning. The Colorado ban and others like it, pushed heavily by the lobbyists, are the only therapies I know banned based on intended outcome, rather than method. They want to literally make it illegal to even try to achieve heterosexuality.

It is in a person's best interest not to engage in sodomy. One cannot reproduce that way and it is a harbinger of all sorts of infectious diseases. A successful conversion therapy that steers a person away from sodomy is a net benefit to that person's life. The lobbyists want to categorically forbid it.

It is in a person's best interest to be in harmony with one's own biological sex. Current methods of attempting to change one's semblance to the other sex are incomplete, can cause permanent damage, and yet it is the alternative—therapies that target the neuroplastic mind to address the root dysphoria—that the lobby wants to ban.
New profile picture in honor of Public Domain Day 2025

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 48,740
Apparently “justice” Jackson doesn’t understand the First Amendment. 
Nie mój cyrk, nie moje małpy