The Devil’s Algorithm: Unplugging from the Climate Matrix

[rangerrebew]

The Devil’s Algorithm: Unplugging from the Climate Matrix
Tilak Doshi
Oct 03, 2025
 

The world is trapped in a digital Matrix, not unlike the one depicted in the iconic 1999 film (The Matrix) where Morpheus offers Neo a choice: take the blue pill and remain in a comforting illusion or the red pill and confront the unsettling truth. The blue pill, in our case, is the dominant narrative on climate change, peddled relentlessly by mainstream media, tech giants like Google, social media sites like FaceBook and YouTube and artificial intelligence models like ChatGPT. This narrative — that man-made global warming, caused by fossil fuel use, is an imminent existential threat — has achieved near-total dominance, suffocating dissent and sidelining credible scientists who dare question it. Mainstream media and Big Tech’s search algorithms often constitute determining factors in shaping our perception of climate change.

Tilak’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
 
To ‘red pill’ someone is to set him or her free from the manufactured climate consensus, to be open to contrarian views and, in the process, to restore science to its proper place as a field of sceptical inquiry, not ideology.

The Algorithmic Stranglehold on Truth
Dr Robert Epstein, a behavioural scientist, former editor of Psychology Today and Senior Research Fellow at the American Institute for Behavioural Research and Technology, is well known for his work on exposing Big Tech’s influence over voters’ thoughts and over elections. He has spent the last decade monitoring Google’s manipulation of newsfeeds, search results and YouTube suggestions. In 2019, he gave testimony to the United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution on ‘Why Google Poses a Serious Threat to Democracy, and How to End That Threat’. In the testimony, he exposed the chilling extent of Google’s narrative dominance.

In a recent Tech Watch article, Epstein analysed 1,495 Google search results on climate change topics between January and September 2025. The findings are stark: 98% of results aligned with the climate alarmist narrative, 2% were neutral, and a stunning 0% offered a contrarian perspective. Even more troubling, the top three search results — those most likely to be clicked — uniformly promoted the alarmist view, regardless of the searcher’s political leanings. Whether you’re a liberal in New York, a conservative in Pennsylvania or an independent in Arizona, Google feeds you the same story: climate change is an imminent man-made catastrophe requiring urgent action.

https://tilakdoshi.substack.com/p/the-devils-algorithm-unplugging-from

[Smokin Joe]

Objection to climate change narratives has been ongoing since the 1990s https://archive.is/ZEbqO

But a search for this petition (I'm a signatory) only brings up articles critical of it, the signers, the wording, etc.

Not one notes that there was no consensus then, and that search results were deflecting potential signatories away from the actual petition even then. What's worse, by effectively shielding the user from dissent, the lie that 97% of climate scientists agree (meaningless, because they can ALL be wrong) could be perpetuated, even as the peer-review process was used to squelch dissenting papers.

I saw this when a professor found paleo patterned ground on top of a butte in SW North Dakota, documented it (a sure sign of permafrost), and submitted his research to the GSA. It was summarily rejected, "because there was no permafrost during the last ice age in ND". 
Nothing like circular reasoning to reject what does not fit your narrative, and it is by no means limited to the climate.

 During COVID I tried to post links, without comment, on Fecebook, to two papers (peer reviewed, medical journal articles, one from 2005--NEJM and Lancet). The post was branded as "misinformation" in less time than it took to click my mouse.

Twitter was such an echo chamber then, that I didn't even try there.

Web searches relied on searching for specific papers, digging through the references to find others. Many were available, but some were behind paywalls.

It has otten worse, with AI telling us what to think.

Grok (yes, even Grock) was labeling posts as "potential spam", when they were factual, contained only reference links, if any, and sold no product. I confronted it, asked how those posts were considered SPAM. They were not repetitive. They sold no product. Links (if any) were provided to references, not selling anything. The material content was factual.   After doing that a few times, Grok stopped putting my posts in the 'potential spam' bit at the bottom of the thread, but I always check there for information that may have been masked. (sometimes censorship is subtle).

[Free Vulcan]

The original perpetrators of the Climate Change hoax knew that carbon and CO2 is involved directly and indirectly in about everything that we do, so that all they had to do is give CO2 the powers of magic pixie dust and they could implement their marxist global agenda and world dictatorship through the back door.

From there they hyped, manipulated, smokescreened, strongarmed and most of all guilted everyone to join their scheme, only to find out that Net Zero's real goals are destitution and population reduction so that the wealthy and true believers can have the world as their playground.

[DefiantMassRINO]

That's giving them too much credit.  It's not the Devil's Algorithm.  No math nor logic needed.

It's fiction.  Made up.  Imaginary.  Nuclear Winter.  Global Warming.  Hairspray / Ozone Layer.  Global Climate Change.  Polar bear extinction.  Demon CO₂.  Satan's Farts (methane).  They keep moving the goal posts to avoid accountability and keep the fraud going.

A Koala has a better chance at catching its own tail than the Global Climate Change Fraud Cult has of being right.