Author Topic: On Point: US Dept. Of War: What's in a Name Change?  (Read 123 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 182,417
On Point: US Dept. Of War: What's in a Name Change?
« on: September 12, 2025, 06:08:03 am »
On Point: US Dept. Of War: What's in a Name Change?
 
by Austin Bay
September 10, 2025
Down, direct and perhaps a bit dirty has its place, especially in the complex undertaking German strategic theorist Carl von Clausewitz called "politics by other means."

Politics by other means was Clausewitz's restrained definition of war. When economic enticements go bust and diplomatic "jaw jaw" deadlocks, destructive acts of violence become the mode of political discourse between rival human groups -- from tribes to superpowers.

President Donald Trump has decided to dispense with the name Dept. of Defense and revive the original nom de guerre Dept. of War.

Which raises what I think is the determinative question: Does changing the name of America's war-waging institution enhance war deterrence or, in other words, help convince a bad actor he will get killed if he doesn't make a deal, or, when deterrence fails, does altering the name increase the prospect of victory in deadly conflict?

https://www.strategypage.com/on_point/20250910175345.aspx#gsc.tab=0
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 182,417
Re: On Point: US Dept. Of War: What's in a Name Change?
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2025, 06:08:57 am »
I think War Department would be better still.
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,915
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
Re: On Point: US Dept. Of War: What's in a Name Change?
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2025, 06:23:27 am »
The change back to calling the DoD the War Department won't mean a thing unless the mentality of those working inside the 5 Sided Palace changes as well.


Hegseth has done a great job so far...but he's still got an uphill struggle to get us back to a warrior mentality.
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!