Exclusive — President Trump Defines ‘Panicans’: ‘Sort of Dangerous’ People Who ‘Can’t Handle Pressur

[mystery-ak]

Exclusive — President Trump Defines ‘Panicans’: ‘Sort of Dangerous’ People Who ‘Can’t Handle Pressure’

Matthew Boyle 3 Aug 2025 Maidens, Scotland

MAIDENS, South Ayrshire, Scotland — President Donald Trump in an exclusive interview with Breitbart News taped here last week formally defined the term he came up with, “Panicans,” when asked what he and his team at the White House mean when they rip worrywarts freaking out during high-stakes political moments faced by the president and the nation.

“In some cases they are good people that really have the best and they want to do things but I call them ‘Panicans’ because maybe they’re not smart because they’re playing right into the enemy’s camp,” Trump said. “And in other types of cases they really are — people are panicked. They can’t handle pressure. Both are sort of dangerous.”

Trump sat down with Breitbart News for nearly an hour for an exclusive interview on-camera interview at his luxurious seaside golf resort Turnberry here in western Scotland last week, just before British Prime Minister Keir Starmer arrived for a bilateral meeting and press availability with the president. The answer to this particular question came just moments before Starmer pulled up to the property for the appearance alongside the president.

Dating back months now, Trump and his team have roasted what they call “Panicans” at critical moments. Sometimes they are people close to the president or folks who were supportive of his comeback campaign in 2024 who are somewhat critical of this issue or that, and these supposed divisions are something the Democrats and the establishment media have sought to exploit for political gain. Trump has fended off these claims of division within his America First movement on everything from how he approaches tariffs and trade policy to key immigration policy elements, to how he approached U.S. involvement in the Israeli war in Iran, to even now with how he’s handling the Jeffrey Epstein files years after his former friend’s death. But Trump is not rattled by any of it, and he and his team keep on rolling — and mocking the “Panicans” at every turn.

more
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/08/03/exclusive-president-trump-defines-panicans-sort-of-dangerous-people-who-cant-handle-pressure/

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

Who is the "enemy"? Do we really view libs as "enemies"? My friends and family, who may happen to have a different political opinion than I, are the enemy? I don't think so.

[Free Vulcan]

Who is the "enemy"? Do we really view libs as "enemies"? My friends and family, who may happen to have a different political opinion than I, are the enemy? I don't think so.

They see us as the enemy, so do we have a choice?

[Bigun]

Who is the "enemy"? Do we really view libs as "enemies"? My friends and family, who may happen to have a different political opinion than I, are the enemy? I don't think so.

Next question!

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

Next question!

So does everyone's kids hate them here? I seem to recall more than a few are not on speaking terms with some loved ones, which is stupid imo.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

They see us as the enemy, so do we have a choice?

Literally yes.

[Free Vulcan]

Literally yes.

You put far more trust in your liberal relatives than I do.

[Bigun]

So does everyone's kids hate them here? I seem to recall more than a few are not on speaking terms with some loved ones, which is stupid imo.

Why do you insist on equating hate with enemy? I spent a year in Vietnam fighting my enemy but never hated any of them. @Weird Tolkienish Figure

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

Why do you insist on equating hate with enemy? I spent a year in Vietnam fighting my enemy but never hated any of them. @Weird Tolkienish Figure

But you killed them, right?

[Bigun]

But you killed them, right?

I'm sure I did but that does not mean I hated them.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

I'm sure I did but that does not mean I hated them.

So that's actually worse. I don't see anyone I disagree with as the enemy. That's stupid IMO.

[Bigun]

So that's actually worse. I don't see anyone I disagree with as the enemy. That's stupid IMO.

They were shooting at me, and I was returning fire. Not personal, just doing our jobs.  Btw; there are a few people that I have genuinely hated. John Sydney McCain III being one example. All were traitors. Not mere enemies.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

They were shooting at me, and I was returning fire.

That is not at all what I'm talking about. I didn't bring up the Viet Cong and frankly they're basically irrelevant to this conversation in this context.

[Bigun]

That is not at all what I'm talking about. I didn't bring up the Viet Cong and frankly they're basically irrelevant to this conversation in this context.

I agree. I was just trying to illustrate that one does not have to hate his enemies. You can hate what they are fighting for without hating them personally. That's how I regard most of my political enemies. When they become traitors it's a different story.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

I agree. I was just trying to illustrate that one does not have to hate his enemies. You can hate what they are fighting for without hating them personally. That's how I regard most of my political enemies. When they become traitors it's a different story.

IMO if your life is that wrapped up in politics that you believe your compatriots are "the enemy", that is a recipe for misery.

[Bigun]

IMO if your life is that wrapped up in politics that you believe your compatriots are "the enemy", that is a recipe for misery.

IMO if you think you must hate an enemy THAT is a recipe for misery. I can vehemently disagree with someone and still be friends with them. That doesn't mean I don't still want to defeat them.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

IMO if you think you must hate an enemy THAT is a recipe for misery. I can vehemently disagree with someone and still be friends with them. That doesn't mean I don't still want to defeat them.

I guess this is semantics at this point. "Opponents" to me has different connotations than "enemy".

I'm not as old as some people here but I remember when there was an alternative view of congresscritters, they were public servants, who you could go to about some problem with the government and get help, no matter their party or viewpoint. Seemed to change in the 90's.

[cato potatoe]

Was Donald a panican in 2020?  As I recall he was one of the people leading the panic. 

[Fishrrman]

Just some random thoughts, don't mean nuthin' ...

Is islam "the enemy"? (their numbers are growing here)

Are communists "the enemy"? (seems like their numbers are growing, also)

Would someone who embraces one (or even both) of the above become our "enemy"?
(hint: there's someone like that who's gonna be the next mayor of New York City)

If other American citizens of the left embrace these worldviews/"religion", do they become "the enemy"?

How do they regard YOU ??

Sometimes it's "not our choice".
It simply is what it is.

[Smokin Joe]

Who is the "enemy"? Do we really view libs as "enemies"? My friends and family, who may happen to have a different political opinion than I, are the enemy? I don't think so.

If you can keep on the level of simple opinion, perhaps not.

Many cannot, often moving on to the next level.

You may not consider them the enemy, but they may consider YOU as their enemy.

A search on Google for "clips of politicians calling for violent action against conservatives"
produced only alleged calls for violence by...Republicans.
https://www.google.com/search?q=clips+of+politicians+calling+for+violent+action+against+conservatives&client=firefox-b-1-d&sca_esv=e8e3451742a7a0b0&ei=HXeRaIGjEuq6kPIPsbiF-AM&ved=0ahUKEwjBpav-2fKOAxVqHUQIHTFcAT8Q4dUDCBA&oq=clips+of+politicians+calling+for+violent+action+against+conservatives&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiRWNsaXBzIG9mIHBvbGl0aWNpYW5zIGNhbGxpbmcgZm9yIHZpb2xlbnQgYWN0aW9uIGFnYWluc3QgY29uc2VydmF0aXZlczIKEAAYsAMY1gQYRzIKEAAYsAMY1gQYRzIKEAAYsAMY1gQYRzIKEAAYsAMY1gQYRzIKEAAYsAMY1gQYRzIKEAAYsAMY1gQYRzIKEAAYsAMY1gQYRzIKEAAYsAMY1gQYR0jVvBJQAFgAcAF4AZABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBDMgBAJgCAaACCpgDAIgGAZAGCJIHATGgBwCyBwC4BwDCBwMyLTHIBwY&sclient=gws-wiz-serp

You've seen a multitude of video clips of prominent Democrats calling for violence, even calling for "war" in the streets, from Valerie Jarrett calling for "paybacks" to BLM and ANTIFA in the streets 'doing it', to Mad Maxine ranting and others.
 
Not one of those was mentioned.

Propaganda is an essential element of warfare, and that war is being waged in mass media and online, even in search engines, not just the streets of LA, Seattle, Portland, Minneapolis, Chicago, Fergusson, Cincinnati, and elsewhere.

Does that give you any idea what the stakes are and what we are up against?

Sorry, but war has been declared against us, whether we want it or not.
The question is one of whether we fight back, legally, or allow ourselves to be overrun by corruption and power mad people and eventually have to fight back in the streets and from the rooftops.

I prefer the 'soft' conflict to BITS, but there is already a race war being fabricated through the violent rhetoric being spewed against conservatives in general, Trump supporters specifically, and anyone who doesn't check a bunch of boxes on the DEI form.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

If you can keep on the level of simple opinion, perhaps not.

Many cannot, often moving on to the next level.

You may not consider them the enemy, but they may consider YOU as their enemy.

A search on Google for "clips of politicians calling for violent action against conservatives"
produced only alleged calls for violence by...Republicans.
https://www.google.com/search?q=clips+of+politicians+calling+for+violent+action+against+conservatives&client=firefox-b-1-d&sca_esv=e8e3451742a7a0b0&ei=HXeRaIGjEuq6kPIPsbiF-AM&ved=0ahUKEwjBpav-2fKOAxVqHUQIHTFcAT8Q4dUDCBA&oq=clips+of+politicians+calling+for+violent+action+against+conservatives&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiRWNsaXBzIG9mIHBvbGl0aWNpYW5zIGNhbGxpbmcgZm9yIHZpb2xlbnQgYWN0aW9uIGFnYWluc3QgY29uc2VydmF0aXZlczIKEAAYsAMY1gQYRzIKEAAYsAMY1gQYRzIKEAAYsAMY1gQYRzIKEAAYsAMY1gQYRzIKEAAYsAMY1gQYRzIKEAAYsAMY1gQYRzIKEAAYsAMY1gQYRzIKEAAYsAMY1gQYR0jVvBJQAFgAcAF4AZABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBDMgBAJgCAaACCpgDAIgGAZAGCJIHATGgBwCyBwC4BwDCBwMyLTHIBwY&sclient=gws-wiz-serp

You've seen a multitude of video clips of prominent Democrats calling for violence, even calling for "war" in the streets, from Valerie Jarrett calling for "paybacks" to BLM and ANTIFA in the streets 'doing it', to Mad Maxine ranting and others.
 
Not one of those was mentioned.

Propaganda is an essential element of warfare, and that war is being waged in mass media and online, even in search engines, not just the streets of LA, Seattle, Portland, Minneapolis, Chicago, Fergusson, Cincinnati, and elsewhere.

Does that give you any idea what the stakes are and what we are up against?

Sorry, but war has been declared against us, whether we want it or not.
The question is one of whether we fight back, legally, or allow ourselves to be overrun by corruption and power mad people and eventually have to fight back in the streets and from the rooftops.

I prefer the 'soft' conflict to BITS, but there is already a race war being fabricated through the violent rhetoric being spewed against conservatives in general, Trump supporters specifically, and anyone who doesn't check a bunch of boxes on the DEI form.

Absolutely this happens on the other side, who think conservatives are evil people who want to *fill in the blank*. I'm just tired of it is all.