DNI’s 100 Percent Transparent Response to Obama’s Disgusting Weak Sauce
Kevin McCullough
There’s something deeply satisfying—like a perfect espresso shot—about watching someone caught red-handed still try to talk their way out of it with a straight face.
This week, that someone was Barack Obama.
In case you missed it (because legacy media sure hopes you did), Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard blew the lid off the most insidious political scandal in modern American history—and possibly all of it. She declassified over 100 pages of internal memos revealing what many of us already suspected: the Russia Hoax was never real, and worse—it was never believed by those peddling it.
That’s right. President Obama and his national security team—James Clapper, John Brennan, Susan Rice, and company—knew it was fake. But instead of telling the truth, they weaponized the intelligence community to frame Donald Trump and manipulate the American people. All under the noble banner of “protecting democracy.” You know, the kind of democracy where the elites decide who wins, and you just nod along and clap like trained seals.
According to the newly declassified documents, top intelligence officials before the 2016 election concluded that Russia lacked the intent or ability to meaningfully alter the outcome. But rather than going with that consensus, Obama’s team demanded a new “assessment”—one tailored to create a media firestorm, justify wiretaps, launch special counsels, and trigger three years of cable-news hysteria.
And what did Obama have to say Tuesday night when asked about this?
Brace yourself.
“Nothing in the new documents undermines the fact that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election.”
That’s it. That’s the response.
more
https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2025/07/25/dnis-100-percent-transparent-response-to-obamas-disgusting-weak-sauce-n2660925
