Author Topic: Watergate? Come on, man!  (Read 252 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 408,363
Watergate? Come on, man!
« on: July 25, 2025, 09:42:19 am »
July 24, 2025
Watergate? Come on, man!
By Bruce Radcliffe

What brought Nixon down?

Did he conspire to break into the DNC office to plant a wiretap so he could spy on his political opposition?  No.

Did he know and accede to the “plumbers’” covert activities?   No.

He became part of a cover-up in an attempt to hide the scandal from the public.

Regardless of President Obama’s degree of initiating, planning, ordering, and carrying out the obvious subversive conspiracy against Donald Trump and the will of the American people, he (and every person in that Dec. 9, 2016 White House meeting who hatched the plot) became from that day forth — by default — involved in the cover-up of a plot to undo the efforts of the duly elected incoming president of the United States.

This was an order of magnitude greater than the criminality of Watergate...for which many paid dearly.

What we as a nation do next regarding the Russia-gate hoax will shape the future of politics, Americans’ trust in our institutions and systems, and even perhaps the civil order of peaceful dissent.  Despite the gravity of possible repercussions, we must not sweep it under the rug.  Figuratively speaking, heads need to roll.

more
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/07/watergate_come_on_man.html
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36,033
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
Re: Watergate? Come on, man!
« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2025, 09:46:45 am »
Quote
This was an order of magnitude greater than the criminality of Watergate...for which many paid dearly.

Wrong! It's at least ten orders of magnitude greater!
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline The_Reader_David

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,971
Re: Watergate? Come on, man!
« Reply #2 on: July 25, 2025, 04:05:08 pm »
Order of magnitude means a factor of 10.  You really think the Russia-"collusion"-hoax is 10,000,000,000 times worse than Watergate?

Surely one or two orders of magnitude worse.  Ten orders of magnitude worse than Watergate would require the commission of genocide, or at least the complete overthrow of the American Constitution and the institution of arbitrary arrests and extrajudicial executions.
And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know what this was all about.

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36,033
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
Re: Watergate? Come on, man!
« Reply #3 on: July 25, 2025, 04:26:16 pm »
Order of magnitude means a factor of 10.  You really think the Russia-"collusion"-hoax is 10,000,000,000 times worse than Watergate?

Surely one or two orders of magnitude worse.  Ten orders of magnitude worse than Watergate would require the commission of genocide, or at least the complete overthrow of the American Constitution and the institution of arbitrary arrests and extrajudicial executions.

Yes! That's exactly what they attempted to do.
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Online DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,474
  • Gender: Male
Re: Watergate? Come on, man!
« Reply #4 on: July 25, 2025, 04:46:57 pm »
A sitting President leveraging the resources of the Federal Government to intervene in a domestic election to help a candidate of his party.  Sounds interesting.

Hillary made sure the fix was in during the 2016 Dems primaries by appointing her besty, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, as DNC Chair.  She wasn't going to let another Dem Primary Candidate steal her 'inevitability', like Obama did in 2008.

It was great seeing Hillary snatch defeat from the jaws of victory ... Weiner, Comey, her disdain for middle and rural America ... watching the disbelief and horror on the faces of Hillary and her army of inevitables brought tears of joy to my eyes.

"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it’s entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." - Alan Simpson, Frontline Video Interview