Report: ‘No Evidence’ Biden Knew of Climate-Related Executive Actions Allegedly Signed Via Autopen

[mystery-ak]

Report: ‘No Evidence’ Biden Knew of Climate-Related Executive Actions Allegedly Signed Via Autopen

Olivia Rondeau 28 May 2025
6:20

There is no evidence that former President Joe Biden knew of at least eight climate-related executive actions he supposedly signed during office, according to a pro-American energy watchdog group.

Power the Future, a nonprofit organization founded by energy expert Daniel Turner, released a report this week revealing “troubling” implications about several significant actions from the previous administration, especially given the recent reports that most of the official documents Biden signed during his time were via autopen signature.

Back in March, the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project released a review of “every document we could find with Biden’s signature over the course of his presidency,” along with the disturbing conclusion that all of them had the same autopen signature except for the one announcing that he was ending his campaign for reelection:

https://twitter.com/ItsYourGov/status/1897726502156091716

“Whoever controlled the autopen controlled the presidency,” the Oversight Project wrote in their announcement.

A Power the Future review of eight major executive actions “that fundamentally reshaped American energy policy,” found “no evidence” that the former president ever spoke about any of them —  “Not in a press conference. Not in a speech. Not even a video statement.”

more
https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2025/05/28/report-no-evidence-biden-knew-of-climate-related-executive-actions-allegedly-signed-via-autopen/

[rustynail]

Why haven't they brought out Biden to end this speculation?

[Fishrrman]

‘No Evidence’ Biden Knew of Climate-Related Executive Actions Allegedly Signed Via Autopen

Let's not stop there.

I'll go so far as to speculate that ANY and ALL documents with autopen "biden" signatures were in fact signed without his "knowledge".

He may have been told afterwards that this document or that one was issued, or not. We don't know that.

But again, why would an autopen be required for something he knew about and approved?

Rusty suggests:
"Why haven't they brought out Biden to end this speculation?"

Doing that will only make matters WORSE.
I'll reckon ol' white joe can't remember anything (and that won't be "a lie" on his part, but an honest admission...)

[DB]

Why haven't they brought out Biden to end this speculation?

He can't remember where he was an hour ago. That makes it impossible to determine anything directly from him one way or the other. One would have to believe that every time the auto-pin was used there had to be supporting documentation showing Biden's authorization of it. If there's no documentation, then it can't have any legal weight.

[IsailedawayfromFR]

There is zero chance anything will happen with this.

The Constitution only says that the President must 'approve' of these actions.

That approval can take many forms, and no one can absolutely prove that Biden never approved an item, even if whistleblowers come into the picture and fess up.

John Adams: 'Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.'