Turbo Cancer Cover-Up

[DCPatriot]

https://fearco.net/turbo-cancer-cover-up/


Turbo Cancer Cover-Up


excerpt:

Turbo cancers. Skyrocketing sudden deaths. A wave of autoimmune chaos. And now, credible voices linking the so-called “vaccines” to genomic integration and irreversible damage.

The scale of this ‘experiment’ — on billions of people, including children — is unprecedented. So is the silence from media, governments, and Big Pharma.

Dalgleish continues: “I am terrified about what they have done to our children.”

We’re seeing now isn’t just bad science. It’s potential biological warfare disguised as public health. And those who pushed it, mandated it, and silenced dissent are now either scrambling to bury the fallout or living with an absurd level of denial.

Above link for full article.

[DCPatriot]

Humans are the only mammals who murder their own species.

But just think about the people sitting around the table when this plan was concocted?

Covid vaccines were/are a biological weapon to change the skin tone of the United States of America.

Seriously, how much money was transferred to pull off a successful and possibly mortal attack on the American populations?

Given of what we've seen the Democratic LEFT capable, is it really that much of a stretch to suggest
they targeted certain counties and States in which they're not doing well, politically?

Have read the entire article.
And only reinforces my suspicions.

Barack Obama. 

Name just any other person who epitomizes the degree of hatred an anti-Christ would have in his cold, dead heart for the THEN social culture in the 2008-2009 USA.

[MeganC]

Humans are the only mammals who murder their own species.

Nonsense. Rats kill each other. Dogs kill each other. Chimpanzees kill and eat each other. Etc. and etc. and etc.

[DCPatriot]

Nonsense. Rats kill each other. Dogs kill each other. Chimpanzees kill and eat each other. Etc. and etc. and etc.

@MeganC

Perhaps a little overstatement, but I was focusing on Man's Free Will and premeditation to commit the deed.
I don't believe an animal would take a month or more to plot an assassination.  IMO, it's more...forgive the expression....MANslaughter...a crime of reaction to a slight.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-new-brain/201610/humans-are-genetically-predisposed-to-kill-each-other

[MeganC]

@MeganC

Perhaps a little overstatement, but I was focusing on Man's Free Will and premeditation to commit the deed.
I don't believe an animal would take a month or more to plot an assassination.  IMO, it's more...forgive the expression....MANslaughter...a crime of reaction to a slight.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-new-brain/201610/humans-are-genetically-predisposed-to-kill-each-other

I disagree that humans are predisposed to kill each other. Only a scant minority engages in murder as a compulsion.

Like with Russia murder among humans is generally ancillary to some other purpose such as conquering and enslaving other people. Had Ukraine immediately surrendered to Russia then fewer Ukrainians would have been raped, murdered, and abducted by the Russians.

Murder generally being a means to an end.

[Smokin Joe]

I disagree that humans are predisposed to kill each other. Only a scant minority engages in murder as a compulsion.

Like with Russia murder among humans is generally ancillary to some other purpose such as conquering and enslaving other people. Had Ukraine immediately surrendered to Russia then fewer Ukrainians would have been raped, murdered, and abducted by the Russians.

Murder generally being a means to an end.

If you look hard enough at almost any war, there are economic reasons underlying the conflict.

[MeganC]

If you look hard enough at almost any war, there are economic reasons underlying the conflict.

And Russia is a parasite nation that must steal from others since they produce nothing of value themselves.

[Smokin Joe]

And Russia is a parasite nation that must steal from others since they produce nothing of value themselves.

At best, communists ordinarily steal others' designs and mimic that or claim it to be their own. Even China's massive manufacturing economy was built with western know-how and licensed or stolen designs.

While some of their best have built on that with small tweaks, as did the Russians, most of the technology was stolen or otherwise obtained from western sources. Cheap labor was the draw, and the potential for profiting off of the West while degrading the western industrial base through grossly imbalanced competition (prices below cost), and using the environmental movement to restrict our own industrial growth.
The Soviets provided seed money to Environmental organizations in the 70s and they became international juggernauts, primarily aimed at the West and our non-Communist trading partners.
It isn't accidental, but a long term strategy on their part.

[MeganC]

At best, communists ordinarily steal others' designs and mimic that or claim it to be their own. Even China's massive manufacturing economy was built with western know-how and licensed or stolen designs.

While some of their best have built on that with small tweaks, as did the Russians, most of the technology was stolen or otherwise obtained from western sources. Cheap labor was the draw, and the potential for profiting off of the West while degrading the western industrial base through grossly imbalanced competition (prices below cost), and using the environmental movement to restrict our own industrial growth.
The Soviets provided seed money to Environmental organizations in the 70s and they became international juggernauts, primarily aimed at the West and our non-Communist trading partners.
It isn't accidental, but a long term strategy on their part.

I read the autobiography of Alexander Dolgun* and one of the passages related his experience with simply sharing a small detail about a ball point pen in the USSR.

At the time the USSR could not produce a ball point pen so Dolgun's comment was deemed 'counterrevolutionary'.

The USSR also engaged in a delusion called Lysenkoism in which the official state narrative was not to be questioned or challenged.

These plus other stories informed me that innovation is a criminal act in authoritarian states because the heart of innovation requires questioning the status quo. Thus the people subjected to such regimes are actively discouraged or even killed for innovating.

Thus any progress must come from outside the authoritarian regime.


* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Dolgun

[Smokin Joe]

At best, communists ordinarily steal others' designs and mimic that or claim it to be their own. Even China's massive manufacturing economy was built with western know-how and licensed or stolen designs.

While some of their best have built on that with small tweaks, as did the Russians, most of the technology was stolen or otherwise obtained from western sources. Cheap labor was the draw, and the potential for profiting off of the West while degrading the western industrial base through grossly imbalanced competition (prices below cost), and using the environmental movement to restrict our own industrial growth.
The Soviets provided seed money to Environmental organizations in the 70s and they became international juggernauts, primarily aimed at the West and our non-Communist trading partners.
It isn't accidental, but a long term strategy on their part.

Add to that the general lack of any incentive to make waves with a new design. Kalashnikov was one of the few who actually designed something new that came from outside the usual chain of government (he was a tanker, recovering from wounds when he designed the AK). Of course, such a wildly successful design was hard to ignore.

[DefiantMassRINO]

Challenging the narrative is worse than not wearing the AIDS ribbon.

[jmyrlefuller]

"Error establishing a database connection"