Author Topic: House passes Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ in marathon overnight session  (Read 387 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 402,381
 House passes Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ in marathon overnight session
by Mychael Schnell and Emily Brooks - 05/22/25 6:56 AM ET

House Republicans on Thursday morning passed a sweeping bill full of President Trump’s legislative priorities, marking a major win for Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) but kicking off what is expected to be a bitter battle with the Senate over achieving key parts of the White House’s policy agenda.

The chamber cleared the sprawling package in a 215-214 early-morning vote after days of marathon meetings, intense negotiations that spanned both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue, and a series of last-minute changes to the bill, which were crucial in coalescing Republicans around the measure.

In the end, just two Republicans — Reps. Thomas Massie (Ky.) and Warren Davidson (Ohio) — opposed the legislation. House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris (R-Md.) voted “present.”

The bill — titled the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” adopting Trump’s slogan for the measure — extends the tax cuts enacted by the president in 2017; boosts funding for border, deportation, and national defense priorities; imposes reforms, like beefed-up work requirements, on Medicaid that are projected to result in millions of low-income individuals losing health insurance; rolls back green energy tax incentives; and increases the debt limit by $4 trillion, among many other provisions.

Its passage marks a massive victory for Johnson, who successfully cajoled scores of Republican holdouts — from hardline conservatives to vulnerable moderates — to support the bill before his self-imposed Memorial Day deadline, muscling it through his razor-thin majority.

“Nothing in Congress is ever easy, especially when you have small margins, but we are going to land this plane and deliver this and we’re proud of what we’ve accomplished together,” Johnson said Tuesday. “Every member of the conference can be proud of this legislation in the end. It’s truly [a] nation shaping piece of legislation.”

The GOP trifecta is using the special budget reconciliation process to advance the package, which will allow them to circumvent a Democratic filibuster in the Senate. Looking to take advantage of their full control in Washington, Republicans packed the measure with a host of partisan priorities, putting it on track to be one of the most consequential bills in years and one that will help define Trump’s second term.

Democrats, meanwhile, are working to ensure that definition is one that highlights what analysts say will be devastating impacts for America’s poor — especially as the 2026 midterm elections inch closer.

“This GOP tax scam will force nearly $14 million people to lose their health coverage and cause millions more to pay higher co-pays, premiums and deductibles,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said during Wednesday’s marathon Rules Committee meeting. “Hospitals will close, nursing homes will shut down, and people will die in all of your districts.”

While Republicans say they are targeting waste and fraud in programs like Medicaid and beyond, an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) found that individuals who make the least amount of money will lose household resources as a result of the bill, while Americans who make the most will gain assets.

But even as Democrats launch their attacks, passage of the legislation is a win for Trump. After the president unsuccessfully lobbied Republican holdouts to support the bill during a rare visit to Capitol Hill on Tuesday, he convened the rabble-rousers at the White House hours before the vote and helped broker an agreement that brought them on board. Opposition to the bill, the White House warned, would be the “ultimate betrayal.”

The legislation, though, has a long way to go before it hits Trump’s desk. The Senate is eyeing several changes to the bill that are certain to spark ire in the House — including watering down Medicaid changes and making some tax provisions permanent — setting the stage for a chamber-vs-chamber fight and a legislative ping-pong across the Capitol.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) is already signaling those tweaks.

“There are dials and tweaks on some of the tax issues that our members will want to talk about,” Thune said Tuesday.

The clock is ticking. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Congress must raise the debt limit by mid-July to avoid an economy-rattling default, leaving lawmakers little time to hash out their differences and deliver Trump a bill he can sign into law.

Republican leaders have said they want to enact the package by July 4.

Passage of the bill in the House early Thursday morning marks the culmination of a months-long attempt by Johnson and his lieutenants to craft a package that could muster support across the ideologically diverse conference.

In the final stretch, hardline conservatives in the House Freedom Caucus and Republicans from high-tax blue states required the most attention as they dug in on their distinct demands for the legislation.

Spending hawks pressed leadership to expedite the implementation of the enhanced Medicaid work requirements, accelerate the rollback of green energy tax credits enacted by Democrats, and extract enough spending cuts to ensure that the package would not add to the deficit.

The group secured some of those asks — the Medicaid and green energy tax credit ones, for example — but fell short of others. Instead, Trump is expected to sign a series of executive orders to achieve some of the group’s goals, a strategy that allows them to claim policy wins without having to build consensus in the conference.

“I think we can resolve their concerns and it’ll be probably some combination of work by the president in these areas as well as here in Congress,” Johnson said shortly before Thursday’s vote. “There may be executive orders relating to some of these issues in the near future. And this is a commitment the president has made.”

Centrist Republicans hailing from high-tax blue states, meanwhile, demanded an increase to the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap, which made for intense negotiations between leadership and lawmakers from New York, New Jersey and California. Trump’s 2017 tax cuts implemented a $10,000 SALT cap, which key stakeholders pushed to increase.

Leadership proposed a $30,000 deduction cap for individuals making $400,000 or less, a proposal SALT Caucus members vehemently rejected. Instead, the group floated a $62,000 deduction cap for single filers, and a $124,000 cap for joint filers — highlighting the gulf between the groups.

In the end, after days of tense negotiations that saw a handful of blowups, lawmakers agreed on a $40,000 deduction cap for individuals making $500,000 or less.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5313198-house-passes-trump-big-beautiful-bill/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 402,381
 GOP leaders reveal changes to win over holdouts on Trump agenda bill
by Emily Brooks, Mychael Schnell and Rachel Frazin - 05/21/25 9:20 PM ET

House Republican leadership on Wednesday night unveiled last-minute tweaks to President Trump’s tax cut and spending priorities bill, including increasing the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap and speeding up the implementation of new Medicaid work requirements.

The changes, made in legislation called a manager’s amendment, were revealed after late-stage negotiations with blue-state Republicans and hardline conservatives in the House Freedom Caucus who had been withholding support for the legislation.

GOP leaders plan to bring the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” to a floor vote as soon as it clears the House Rules Committee, either late Wednesday night or in the wee hours of Thursday morning.

Just before the text was unveiled, conservative holdouts emerged for a series of meetings signaling they were ready to support the bill, assuming the laundry list of demands they had negotiated with leadership was reflected in the amendment.

Included in the manager’s amendment is an increase to the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap, which moderate Republicans from high-tax blue states had demanded. The text lays out a $40,000 deduction cap for individuals making $500,000 or less — the same agreement that moderate GOP lawmakers struck with Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) Tuesday night.

The initial version of the bill included a $30,000 deduction cap for individuals making $400,000 or less — a proposal that SALT Republicans vocally rejected.

It also speeds up implementation of new Medicaid work requirements to “no later than December 31, 2026,” rather than Jan. 1, 2029 — a change that hardline conservatives were seeking.

The manager’s amendment does not, however, include some of the more aggressive Medicaid reforms that some Freedom Caucus members were calling for.

In lieu of those alterations, Trump is likely to sign a flurry of executive orders to address some of the matters requested by hardliners that were left on the cutting-room floor. Johnson hinted at the gambit after a meeting at the White House Wednesday.

“You will see how all of this is resolved, but I think we can resolve their concerns and it’ll be probably some combination of work by the president in these areas as well as here in Congress,” the Speaker said. “There may be executive orders relating to some of these issues in the near future. And this is a commitment the president has made.”

Some of the changes are more about style than substance. It renames “MAGA accounts,” a pilot savings account program for children that would get an automatic $1,000 boost for every baby born from 2025 to 2028, as “Trump accounts.”

And other changes address lower-profile sticking points, such as eliminating plans to make cuts to federal employee retirements. The manager’s amendment strikes a provision to have employee pensions be calculated by an average of top 5 years of pay rather than the top three, while changes revealed earlier in the week ditched a plan to require federal employees pay more into their federal retirement plans.

There are a number of changes to the energy and environment portions of the bill, as well.

It speeds up rollback of tax credits for climate-friendly energy sources — handing a win to hardliners who lamented that they were allowed to remain on the books for too long. The prior iteration phased out the credit for projects that began producing electricity after 2028, with partial credit available up until 2032.

Under the new version, there is no partial credit, and any projects that begin producing electricity after 2028 will not be eligible at all. To get the credit, projects will also need to begin n construction within 60 days of the bill’s enactment.

Republicans have also stripped a controversial provision added during the amendment process that would have allowed the sale of certain public lands in Utah and Nevada — a rare victory for environmentalists, who have otherwise hammered the legislation.

Updated at 10:20 p.m.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5313019-salt-medicaid-house-republicans-trump-bill/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline WhatWouldReaganDo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 162
One big, stinking turd.

Trump accounts? Absurd.
Down the centuries, you have slurred the meaning of the words, "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty, to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution". These words and the words that follow, were not written only for the Yangs, but for the Kohms as well! They must apply to everyone, or they mean nothing! - James Tiberius Kirk

Offline American Girl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,584
That's what we voted for!!! The article is the whole summary of what we gonna get!


Trump pulled the strings for the House to pass the largest tax cut in history today.

Excerpt:
Washington, D.C. – You’ve got to read this. The House just passed President Donald Trump’s “One, Big, Beautiful Bill” on May 22, 2025, and it’s packed with provisions that have Democrats running scared. The bill, viewed as a game-changer by conservatives, includes everything from border security to gun rights, and it’s got provisions that Democrats are desperately trying to keep under wraps. “This is what America needs,” one Republican lawmaker said. “Democrats hate it because it puts America first.”





If you earn between $30k-$80k, your taxes will be cut a whopping 15%.

If you’re a server or bartender, you can enjoy tax free tips.

Overtime pay — longer be taxed.

Thank you, Mr. President.

https://www.usasupreme.com/its-official-house-passes-one-big-beautiful-bill-here-are-the-provisions-democrats-dont-want-you-to-see/

Offline mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 61,944
Peter Schiff
@PeterSchiff
The bond market is sending a clear signal that the Big, Beautiful Bill may be big, but it's anything but beautiful. 10-year Treasury yields are up to 4.62% & 30-year yields are up to 5.14%. Rates are going much higher, compounding the cost of financing the soaring national debt.
8:27 AM · May 22, 2025
Quote
Daniel Horowitz
@RMConservative
Now that the bill passed (in the dead of night), a few more observations are in order from what I posted this morning.

1) On the one hand, this is just one step.  The bill has to pass the Senate and then go to conference committee. House conservatives might have felt it wasn't worth being accused of obstructing the process, while reserving the right to oppose it in the end.  Just remember the pressure to support it in the end after this drags out even longer without accomplishing a single thing, it will be impossible to oppose it.  Which again, is why it made sense to pass two bills, and focus now just on immigration spending while offsetting with full green new deal repeal, and leaving the rest for later.

2) Which ties into point #2. This bill will only get worse as time goes on.  They will show endless polling on how the Dem message of taking benefits for tax cuts for the rich is harming them.  This is the problem with the bill.  It's too clever by half.  On the spending side, it has enough entitlement reform to give dems their talking point but not really enough to make the difference both in general inflation and in the runaway health care scheme.  At least if they would have repealed Obamacare, people not on the take would have been excited by reduced premiums.  On the tax side, we are blowing our capital on 'tax cuts for the rich' primarily on a stupid policy of incentivizing blue states to have higher taxes than they did even pre TCJA (the old AMT de facto capped sALT).  In addition, we have all these handout provisions towards the bottom. Just a bizarre assortment of provisions.  The point being that they will inevitably make this bill worse in the Senate but there will be no apatite to oppose it. 

3) Although it's good that at least the majority of the green new deal is repealed within a window of time before Dems take over the House, and that is why I understand a yes vote for this despite the other crap, the tax provisions set up a massive cliff in 2028 when Trump is still president but Dems will likely have the House.  In order to artificially lower the score, they kept all of the spending (ICE, CBP, DOD) and tax handouts (tips, overtime, standard deduction, seniors, car loans, child tax credit, 1,000 in cash for every child account) for just 4 years.  Trump is going to be desperate as hell to extend all of that in 2028 - for better or worse - and will be willing to give Dems an unlimited amount of concessions to make that happen.

4) It's important to remember, regardless of whether the conservatives should have voted yes or no this morning, it's shocking beyond belief that the bill of the century would not have contained a SINGLE meaningful provision if not for about 10-15 members.  Meaning almost all of them were content with blowing our wad on nothing but a crap sandwich without any sprinkles on top.

5) As a matter of policy, there is good, bad, and random weirdness. However, between spending and revenue, at the end of the day, numbers don't lie.  The deficit will get even worse from what we thought was an emergency, especially in the short run.  At the end of the day, that is going to void out the benefits of this bill in terms of crushing housing and the cost of living. Watch the bond markets.

6) It would be one thing if this was the first step of many other bites at the apple to cut spending.  But in fact, if you are too scared to cut anything meaningful without needing Dem support (and it took Chip Roy et. al. to fight to the death just to get this far), there is no way in hell they are cutting a single thing in discretionary when there is a filibuster and the threat of a shutdown October 1. Heck, they cant even pass a $9 billion recissions package. Farm bill will be another disaster. Rather than using debt ceiling as our leverage to cut spending, they are handing out $4 trillion more in this bill. They will not use any other must pass bill for leverage.

7) Given that they were never going to deal with spending, they should have at least gone all out on immigration.  Chip Roy had an amendment to kick the courts out of all deportation cases and all state enforcement laws.  That was not included and the white house never pushed for it.  Absent this provision, the deportation agenda is DEAD. Hence, the increased spending for ICE is meaningless without judicial reform and will just add to the deficit crushing our cost of living.

More later.
7:44 AM · May 22, 2025

The abnormal is not the normal just because it is prevalent.
Roger Kimball, in a talk at Hillsdale College, 1/29/25

Offline cato potatoe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,652
  • Gender: Male
I can understand why Elon Musk withdrew, if they aren't going to make substantive cuts.  Right wingers were hectored into passing the CR so actual cuts would be negotiated with this bill.  And here we see another $150 billion gift to the military-industrial complex while Trump is recruiting primary challengers to Massie and Roy.

Offline DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,632
  • Gender: Male
Deregulation to grow GDP does not require additional spending.  WTF are they spending more money on?
"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it’s entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." - Alan Simpson, Frontline Video Interview

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 402,381
Not done yet: US Senate Republicans plan changes to House's Trump tax-cuts bill
By Bo Erickson
May 22, 20252:40 PM CDT Updated 3 hours ago

    Senate Republicans divided over Medicaid cuts and debt ceiling increase
    Hawley proposes expanding child tax credit amid bill negotiations
    Senate to debate bill post-Memorial Day recess, facing pressure from Trump

WASHINGTON, May 22 (Reuters) - U.S. Senate Republicans said on Thursday they will seek substantial changes to President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill after it narrowly won approval in the House of Representatives, in a sign that significant hurdles remain for the package.

Just hours after House Republicans passed it with only one vote to spare, senators from Trump's party outlined a range of objections to the package, which encompasses many of his top domestic priorities. That could make it more difficult for Congress to settle on a final version for Trump to sign into law.
"I expect there will be considerable changes in the Senate," said Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas.
Republicans broadly agree on the main planks of the legislation, which would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, tighten eligibility for health and food benefits, review many green-energy incentives and fund Trump's immigration crackdown.

But many of the same fractures that threatened the bill's passage in the House are at play in the Senate. Some lawmakers raised concerns about cuts to the Medicaid health care program, noting that the coalition of voters who powered Trump's November election victory and whose support they will need to hold control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections rely on the bill.

more
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/not-done-yet-us-senate-republicans-plan-changes-houses-trump-tax-cuts-bill-2025-05-22/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 47,393
  • Gender: Male
Just remember this:  The Bill would not have passed had the Democrat Congressman (Connolly of VA) not die yesterday morning.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2025, 09:38:14 pm by DCPatriot »
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

The idea that somebody looked at a purple onion and called it a red onion really bothers me.   

"It was only a sunny smile, and little it cost in the giving, but like morning light it scattered the night and made the day worth living" F. Scott Fitzgerald