Massive Study: Sharp Rise in Major Heart Events After COVID Vax

[Hoodat]

Massive Study: Sharp Rise in Major Heart Events After COVID Vax

M Dowling  |  April 10, 2025

A new massive study of 85 million people, COVID-19 vaccination and cardiovascular events: a systematic review and Bayesian multivariate meta–analysis of preventive, benefits, and risk, was published in the March edition of the International Journal of Preventive Medicine.

It is a peer-reviewed analysis of 85 million people. The researchers uncovered a profoundly concerning rise in life-threatening cardiovascular events following COVID-19 vaccination.

It leaves serious questions about the long-term health impacts of mRNA (Pfizer and Moderna) and viral vector vaccines (AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson).

Rheleh Karimi, a biostatistician at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in Iran, led the study. He collaborated with international researchers from Spain and Portugal. They used advanced Bayesian statistical methods.  .  .  .

https://www.independentsentinel.com/massive-study-sharp-rise-in-major-heart-events-after-covid-vax/

[Hoodat]

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD):

• Overall, a 70% increased risk
  
• Pfizer (BNT162b2): 64% increased risk
  
• Second dose (any vaccine): A massive 244% increased risk

Heart Attacks (Myocardial Infarction):

• Second dose (any vaccine): 286% increased risk
  
• Pfizer (any dose): 87% increased risk
  
• Second dose of Pfizer: 284% increased risk

Stroke:

• Pfizer (any dose): 109% increased risk
  
• First dose of Pfizer: 269% increased risk
  
• First dose (any vaccine): 240% increased risk

Arrhythmia:

• First dose (any vaccine): 199% increased risk
  
• AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1): 711% increased risk
  
• First dose of AstraZeneca: 389% increased risk

[mountaineer]

I'm shocked, I tell you.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

https://journals.lww.com/ijom/fulltext/2025/03210/covid_19_vaccination_and_cardiovascular_events__a.6.aspx

[Smokin Joe]

Where's the perp walks?

[jafo2010]

I knew these vaccines were deadly since May, 2020. 

When a General/Doctor at the Defense Health Agency that heads viral research told my friend back then, right before the vaccines were being distributed, 'do not under any circumstance take these vaccines, they are deadly.'  That is all I needed to hear.  It occurred to me he was in the know, and obviously there was evidence to that outcome for him to make such a declaration.

Read Dr. Mary's Monkey if you want to get a sense how long vaccines have been deadly in the USA.  Very interesting book.

[Smokin Joe]

The gimmick used to conceal the reactions was when they said you were not "vaccinated" until two weeks after you got the shot.

So, if on day 1 through 13 you died from adverse effects, you were "not vaccinated".

...and that's how more immediate (and often severe, sometimes lethal) adverse effects were statistically cloaked.

[Bigun]

I knew these vaccines were deadly since May, 2020. 

When a General/Doctor at the Defense Health Agency that heads viral research told my friend back then, right before the vaccines were being distributed, 'do not under any circumstance take these vaccines, they are deadly.'  That is all I needed to hear.  It occurred to me he was in the know, and obviously there was evidence to that outcome for him to make such a declaration.

Read Dr. Mary's Monkey if you want to get a sense how long vaccines have been deadly in the USA.  Very interesting book.

IIRC there were plenty of folks here calling BS on these so called "vaccines" at the time. I've never been subjected to a COVID test much less a shot but they did manage to kill my daughter and several others that I know about.
Even today we ae seeing many young, otherwise healthy, people with heart problems.

[catfish1957]

One of my first jobs out of college was in a State Dept. of Health, where i had epidemiological reporting duties to CDC.  Back in those days, those were some outstanding folks, who truly took public health protection seriously.

But, have been so removed from it for so long, I made the mistake of thinking that the same kind of critters were still there.  With my 16 hours of Micro, I certainly knew how a vaccine was precisely defined.  When the exact moment came up, that people were coming down with the disease after vaccination was applied, I knew something was amiss.

Now it is becoming apparent,  Something more nefarious or utterly incompetence was involved.  How much was intentional, or due to the pressure to get a vax on market?   It might be a while before those details are worked out.   I am still a proponent of vax when it makes sense.  Example?  Damn straight I am going to get a flu shot at the moment when the health care community has a good feel of what the dominant strain will be that year.  Childhood vaccinations?  I support those mostly too.  The benefit has far outweighed the risk, in these cases through the years

[jmyrlefuller]

Stroke:

• Pfizer (any dose): 109% increased risk
  
• First dose of Pfizer: 269% increased risk
  
• First dose (any vaccine): 240% increased risk

Arrhythmia:

• First dose (any vaccine): 199% increased risk
  
• AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1): 711% increased risk
  
• First dose of AstraZeneca: 389% increased risk

these numbers contradict each other.

[DefiantMassRINO]

I mostly got the Pfizer shot.  My last booster was a Moderna shot.  I had a much more (good) rigorous reaction with Moderna than Pfizer.

I've had Covid-19 once, in June, 2023, less than a month after I got the first Pfizer Coivd-19 booster.  I believe it was Omicron variant, for which the booster had not been updated, yet.

I certainly was not nearly as direly ill as those who caught Covid-19 in March, 2020, including some of my wife's relatives.  I don't know whether that was due my own immune system, the Pfizer shot and Pfizer booster, a less virulent Omicron variant, or a combination thereof.

The Covid-19 shot is not a vaccine to prevent illness; it's more of a booster to reduce severity of illness.

The Covid-19 shot improves my odds of having a less severe infection.

Since the roll-out of the shots, Emergency Rooms and ICU's are not as overwhelmed.  This could be attributed to multiple things - the MRNA shots, less virulent strains, and herd immunity.

Horseshoe bats are reservoirs of many beta corona viruses.  Infected Horseshoe bats are mostly non-symptomatic, but there are many, frequent virus recombinations that lead to new strains of beta corona viruses and potentially new novel viruses.

For public officials, the decision was roll-out the shots with unknown risks, or risk global economic, social, and political collapse.

A little something is still more than a whole lot of nothing.

The spread of Covid-19 was a failure of the Chinese Communist Party, the WHO, and the CDC.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

I got the vaccine, and booster and again this past month. Doctor recommended it so I got it. Thing is, nobody I know had any ill effects from the vaccine, if they did that would certainly give me pause. I try to live my life according to my gut, and ignore all the screaming mimis, left and right. I will say, I think it should be a personal choice. I get the flu vaccine every year too, haven't been sick from that in a while.

[Hoodat]

I mostly got the Pfizer shot.  My last booster was a Moderna shot.  I had a much more (good) rigorous reaction with Moderna than Pfizer.

I've had Covid-19 once, in June, 2023, less than a month after I got the first Pfizer Coivd-19 booster.

So explain the point again of getting the jab?  Sounds like you and me both got Covid, except that I don't have some genetic code in me that can't be turned off, working in my cells to generate foreign spike proteins of a virus that have long since mutated.  But hey, Pfizer and Moderna sure got rich off of it.

[Hoodat]

I got the vaccine, and booster and again this past month.  .  .

You do realize it isn't a vaccine, right?

[Hoodat]

these numbers contradict each other.

Yes, they do.  Very ambiguous at best.  I hope to get better figures.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

You do realize it isn't a vaccine, right?

?

[The_Reader_David]

Okay, this is part of what is needed to make a judgement about the vaccines' safety. 

The other thing needed are equally solid statistics on the change in mortality rate from COVID between the unvaccinated and the vaccinated, the effect of vaccination on the rate of COVID infections, and on the change in these sorts of cardiac events in the wake of a COVID infection.

Without that this is just evidence that like all medical interventions, there is some risk, along with a quantification of these particular risks in this case.   Unless you have the other data, you don't have enough to make a rational risk assessment.

Back during the pandemic, I recall there being evidence that although the Astra-Zenaca vaccine produced some potentially dangerous cardiac abnormalities, they were even more prevalent in those who had had a case of COVID.  I've not seen or heard any comparable comparisons for the mRNA vaccines.  (Anecdotally, I've had 5 doses of Moderna and 2 of Pfizer and taken no ill effect beyond soreness or itchiness at the injection site for a day or two after.)

[Hoodat]

You do realize it isn't a vaccine, right?

?

The mechanism of a vaccine is to create antibodies that kill the virus.  The Covid jab doesn't do that.  Instead, it creates protein spikes similar to those of the virus.  The resulting antibodies  coat the spikes on the virus without actually killing it.  In effect, they protect the virus from the body's immune system.

[Hoodat]

Okay, this is part of what is needed to make a judgement about the vaccines' safety. 

The other thing needed are equally solid statistics on the change in mortality rate from COVID between the unvaccinated and the vaccinated, the effect of vaccination on the rate of COVID infections, and on the change in these sorts of cardiac events in the wake of a COVID infection.  .  .  .

I would have expected the death rate after Covid to fall below pre-Covid levels since Covid killed off people in 2020 and 2021 who possibly would have died in 2023.  However, death rates for 2023 were still higher than 2019.

Not saying this connected to the vaccine.  But it definitely shows that there is evidence out there that could be studied.

[Smokin Joe]

Okay, this is part of what is needed to make a judgement about the vaccines' safety. 

The other thing needed are equally solid statistics on the change in mortality rate from COVID between the unvaccinated and the vaccinated, the effect of vaccination on the rate of COVID infections, and on the change in these sorts of cardiac events in the wake of a COVID infection.

Without that this is just evidence that like all medical interventions, there is some risk, along with a quantification of these particular risks in this case.   Unless you have the other data, you don't have enough to make a rational risk assessment.

Back during the pandemic, I recall there being evidence that although the Astra-Zenaca vaccine produced some potentially dangerous cardiac abnormalities, they were even more prevalent in those who had had a case of COVID.  I've not seen or heard any comparable comparisons for the mRNA vaccines.  (Anecdotally, I've had 5 doses of Moderna and 2 of Pfizer and taken no ill effect beyond soreness or itchiness at the injection site for a day or two after.)

If you recall, the proclamation was made that you were not considered 'vaccinated' until two weeks had passed after you got the shot. The most severe acute adverse reactions to the shot were likely to occur within that window, and thus the statistics would reflect that even though that person had been given the shot, they were not considered 'vaccinated'.

If you think about it, that is a brilliant way to mask the most severe adverse effects of the shots.
It will take a tremendous amount of digging to ferret out that data, to sort the people who died in that two week window or had other reactions, because the data were gimmicked from the start.

[mountaineer]

Yale researchers tracked vax-injured patients over time—and they were shocked to learn that some individuals were still producing spike protein 709 days after vaccination.

https://twitter.com/VigilantFox/status/1910669967399277011

More at Midwestern Doctor blog (which explains the whole process of how vaccines work or are supposed to work):

Yale Just Proved COVID Vaccine Injury Exists and Spike Production Persists for Years Inside The Body
Reviewing the consequences of the reckless steps used to make the vaccines and the immunological damage which followed
A Midwestern Doctor
Feb 19, 2025

Last year, I learned of a Yale study which had discovered the COVID vaccine persisted in the body and caused long term immunological impairments—something I believe relates to the egregious production process that characterized the COVID-19 vaccines. ...

[Hoodat]

Yale researchers tracked vax-injured patients over time—and they were shocked to learn that some individuals were still producing spike protein 709 days after vaccination.

Why were they shocked?  There is nothing in that mRNA programming that turns it off.  And THEY KNEW THAT!!!

[Smokin Joe]

"Long COVID".

[DCPatriot]

Keep wondering if the Moderna jabs are the culprit to explain my perpetual whirling, dizziness/lightheadedness.

Certainly isn't dehydration, since I drink at least 60oz of Deer Park spring water per day.  Also, have been on the same medications for BP for over 15 years.

The labs at Kaiser Permanente certainly don't include checking for spike proteins in the course of their bloodwork.