Author Topic: House lawmaker moves to oust judge in deportation case with move that skips impeachment  (Read 934 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 401,707

House lawmaker moves to oust judge in deportation case with move that skips impeachment

Rep. Andy Biggs invoked the “good behavior” clause of the Constitution to argue Congress has the authority to remove judges short of impeachment.
By Steven Richards


Published: March 31, 2025 7:27pm

Updated: March 31, 2025 11:48pm


An Arizona congressman introduced legislation Monday to remove the federal judge who has blocked President Donald Trump's efforts to deport Venezuelan gang members, offering a novel path that avoids the impeachment process and the need for two-thirds support in the U.S. Senate.

Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., filed a resolution that would remove U.S. District Judge James Boasberg for “failing to maintain the standard of good behavior required of judges" under Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution.

“Most Americans believe that there is lifetime tenure for a federal judge. That unless impeached, a federal judge can serve until death," Biggs told Just the News. "But lifetime tenure is not guaranteed, nor mentioned, in the Constitution. Article III, Section 1 permits a federal judge to serve only ‘during good behavior.’”

Biggs argued the clause gives Congress the authority to remove judges that it believes have failed to uphold that standard short of using impeachment.

more
https://justthenews.com/government/congress/house-republican-proposes-alternative-method-remove-bad-judges-bypass-senate
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 62,020
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
A Judge will just rule it unconstitutional.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline roamer_1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,502
A Judge will just rule it unconstitutional.

If it even passes... And because it is unconstitutional. Impeachment is the process for removing a judge. Bad behavior? Sure. IMPEACH him for bad behavior. That might fly. But impeachment is the tool.

Online Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 62,020
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
If it even passes... And because it is unconstitutional. Impeachment is the process for removing a judge. Bad behavior? Sure. IMPEACH him for bad behavior. That might fly. But impeachment is the tool.

A pretty dull tool with half the Senate who would never vote to convict because they are Dems.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline roamer_1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,502
A pretty dull tool with half the Senate who would never vote to convict because they are Dems.

Then you have to buy the votes.

Online DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,212
  • Gender: Male
Earmarks were the currency used to buy Senators votes.  Alas, no earmarks, nothing to grease the skids.

Some state(s) may have standing to sue in the Supreme Court that the extra-Constitutional requirement for 60 votes is un-Constitutional because states are being denied equal representation in the US Senate based upon a 40% minority of Senate votes over-ruling a 59%  majority of US Senate votes.
"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it’s entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." - Alan Simpson, Frontline Video Interview