SHOWDOWN: Why the Trump administration must SMACK the courts

[libertybele]

SHOWDOWN: Why the Trump administration must SMACK the courts

 The Trump administration appears to be gearing up for a showdown with the federal court system after yet another judge has thrown her hat in the ring to oppose changes long-awaited by the American people.

“We had a rainbow jihad judge appointed by Barack Obama think that she has the power to determine who can and cannot serve in the armed forces,” Steve Deace of the “Steve Deace Show” comments, noting that of all the federal court injunctions that have been issued so far in the 21st century, “about 70% of them have been issued by 92% Democrat-appointed justices and specifically against President Trump.”

“That is a judicial coup,” he continues. “On the right, we have had one major victory ever, in modern times, against judicial tyranny. And it happened right here in the state of Iowa.”

 “What we saw in Iowa is a court thought that it had the power to be its own unelected perpetual constitutional convention, like frankly we have allowed the courts to be for decades. But here’s the thing: We’re kind of in an era right now where we’re kind of waking up to the fact we’ve allowed too much madness to go on, and so now is the time to do something about it,” he adds.

Deace doesn’t believe this is a question of authority rather than legal theory.

“Who’s really in charge of the United States of America? And it’s not even which branch vis-à-vis the other. It’s really whether we the people are. Do we exist for the government, do we exist for the system, or does the government and the system exist for us?” Deace asks.

“That’s really the heart of the argument,” he continues. “We fought a revolutionary war over a lack of agency and representation, as Englishmen were now essentially evicted from their own citizenship. And you’re claiming that the system they set up after the fact was with the intent of just replacing it with the exact same thing?” .....................

https://www.conservativereview.com/showdown-why-the-trump-administration-must-smack-the-courts-2671383674.html

[Kamaji]

[IsailedawayfromFR]

Trump learned his lesson from 1st term by surrounding himself now with great agency and cabinet head picks.

The bright side of the present rogue judges episode is he will now pay a lot more attention to who he nominated for judges.

No more Barrett clones.

[libertybele]

Trump learned his lesson from 1st term by surrounding himself now with great agency and cabinet head picks.

The bright side of the present rogue judges episode is he will now pay a lot more attention to who he nominated for judges.

No more Barrett clones.

Like Roberts, I believe Barrett is compromised.

[DCPatriot]

Like Roberts, I believe Barrett is compromised.

Probably threats concerning her siblings and/or children.

Deep State's "Men in Black" so to speak.

Roberts' behavior most likely connected to Jeffrey Epstein videos.

[libertybele]

Probably threats concerning her siblings and/or children.

Deep State's "Men in Black" so to speak.

Roberts' behavior most likely connected to Jeffrey Epstein videos.

....hmmm .... That's a possibility I hadn't thought of.  Interesting.  So ... then what's the hold up then on releasing the Epstein files???  I would think that would be to Trump's advantage, unless Bondi has already sold her soul??
 

[Canuck Conservative]

If the unelected lower courts have the final say on any Governmental policy (via their injunctions), then they are running the Federal Government.

Even you would have to agree, that's not what the Founding Fathers intended.

[Luis Gonzalez]

Roberts' behavior most likely connected to Jeffrey Epstein videos.

I thought that may have been why Schumer caved on the CR.

[Luis Gonzalez]

I would think that would be to Trump's advantage, unless Bondi has already sold her soul??

Once released they can't be used to manipulate the behavior of those in the list.

Bondi won't sell her soul.

[DCPatriot]

I thought that may have been why Schumer caved on the CR.

Don't think so.

I think he saw future campaign commercials where he kept preaching saying for years to the camera that it was very bad that the dastardly Republicans were going to let the government shut down.

The Continuing Resolution to be voted on was the very SAME one that they pushed when they had the majority during Biden.

[libertybele]

I thought that may have been why Schumer caved on the CR.

I can definitely see Chuckie going to Epstein Island.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

So how would Trump "smack" the courts then? He has no power to do so. He can defy their orders of course, which will send us into Constitutional Crisis mode (a real one).

[libertybele]

So how would Trump "smack" the courts then? He has no power to do so. He can defy their orders of course, which will send us into Constitutional Crisis mode (a real one).

If you recall Obama and Holder defied the courts a couple of times -- nothing was done and neither were held accountable.

Sessions did nothing, Barr did nothing .... liberalism continued.

Enter Pam Bondi -- we'll see.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

If you recall Obama and Holder defied the courts a couple of times -- nothing was done and neither were held accountable.

Sessions did nothing, Barr did nothing .... liberalism continued.

Enter Pam Bondi -- we'll see.

Wasn't aware of Obama doing so, Holder was held in contempt of congress IIRC for Fast and Furious... now that truly basically means jack squat as Congress, like the courts, has limited enforcement power beyond their chambers.