Author Topic: Democrats More Panicked About DOGE Accessing Feds’ Computers Than Chinese Hackers  (Read 250 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,385
Democrats More Panicked About DOGE Accessing Feds’ Computers Than Chinese Hackers

Brianna Lyman  |  February 07, 2025


Democrats held three press conferences just this week alone fretting over DOGE potentially having more oversight capability into the federal government. But that’s three more press conferences than they’ve ever held in response to China’s cyberattacks that infiltrated our systems and actually stole sensitive data.

Democrat members of the House Ways and Means Committee held a press conference attacking the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) for being granted read-only access to the Treasury Department’s payment system. Senate Democrats also held a similar press briefing, calling DOGE’s oversight a “hostile takeover of the Treasury Department.” Democrats also assembled outside the Capitol to rally support for fleecing the taxpayers more to pay for things like transgender comic books in Peru.

Democrats also feigned outrage about DOGE “having access to the management and disbursement of trillions of dollars and the highly sensitive information of millions of Americans.”

Yet, this is the same party that, after Chinese hackers have repeatedly breached our cybersecurity and stolen millions of Americans’ sensitive data, has stayed silent.

Just this past December, Chinese hackers “breached the U.S. Treasury Department’s computer security guardrails … and stole documents in what Treasury called a ‘major incident,'” according to Reuters. The Treasury Department claimed the Chinese hackers accessed unclassified documents and Treasury user workstations.  .  .  .

https://thefederalist.com/2025/02/07/democrats-more-panicked-about-doge-accessing-feds-computers-than-chinese-hackers/
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,385
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-