The Federalist by John Daniel Davidson 1/24/2025
Beyond the legal arguments about the 14th Amendment is the moral argument: who is America for, and what makes someone an American?On his first day in office, President Trump did the country a great service by issuing an executive order rejecting birthright citizenship as a requirement of the 14th Amendment.
Whether Trump’s order will withstand the legal challenges remains to be seen (a federal judge in Seattle temporarily blocked the order on Thursday). But the challenges themselves will force a reckoning on this issue, perhaps even at the Supreme Court.
Such a reckoning is overdue. For far too long we have accepted without question the outlandish idea that every single person born on U.S. soil automatically becomes an American citizen, and that the 14th Amendment somehow mandates this suicidal policy.
I’m not going to do a deep dive into the legal arguments for why the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause doesn’t grant automatic citizenship to everyone born on U.S. soil (for that, see here, here, here, here, here, and here). Suffice to say, it wasn’t until about the middle of the 20th century, amid massive upheavals in American life, that the notion of “birthright citizenship” was adopted — over and against how we had understood the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause since it was adopted in 1868.
Briefly, the legal argument is this: to acquire citizenship, the 14th Amendment requires a person to be born in the United States and be “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” which means you owe your total allegiance to the United States alone and not some foreign power. In other words, the children of illegal immigrants, or those here on a temporary basis, were not American citizens. That’s what the drafters of the 14th Amendment said at the time and that’s how the Supreme Court understood it when ruling on 14th Amendment-related cases in the decades following ratification.
On that point, actually, we’re going to be hearing a lot in the coming weeks and months about an 1898 Supreme Court case called United States v. Wong Kim Ark. Proponents of birthright citizenship point to this case as proof that the 14thAmendment does indeed confer birthright citizenship, but they’re wrong. Wong Kim Ark involved a child born to parents who were lawfully present and permanently domiciled in the United States, not to illegal immigrants or temporary residents.
More:
https://thefederalist.com/2025/01/24/birthright-citizenship-is-a-pernicious-lie-thats-destroying-america/
