Author Topic: Judges Take Shots At Trump In Reluctant Dismissals Of Jan. 6 Cases After Pardons  (Read 326 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Timber Rattler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,777
  • Conservative Purist and Patriot
https://dailycaller.com/2025/01/23/judges-take-shots-at-trump-in-reluctant-dismissals-of-jan-6-cases-after-pardons/

Quote
Several judges let their disapproval of President Donald Trump’s pardons for over 1,500 Jan. 6 defendants show in orders dismissing cases.

Judges for the federal district court in Washington, D.C. opined that Trump’s decision to commute sentences for 14 individuals and pardon all others convicted on charges related to Jan. 6 could not change the “truth” about that day.

“[T]his Court cannot let stand the revisionist myth relayed in this presidential pronouncement,” Judge Beryl Howell wrote in an order Wednesday. “The prosecutions in this case and others charging defendants for their criminal conduct at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, present no injustice, but instead reflect the diligent work of conscientious public servants, including prosecutors and law enforcement officials, and dedicated defense attorneys, to defend our democracy and rights and preserve our long tradition of peaceful transfers of power—which, until January 6, 2021, served as a model to the world—all while affording those charged every protection guaranteed by our Constitution and the criminal justice system.”

Howell made the comments in an order dismissing cases against Proud Boy leader Nicholas Ochs and Texas man Nicholas Decarlo, who threw smoke bombs at police. Both were sentenced to four years in prison in Dec. 2022.

Judge Tanya Chutkan, who also presided over the criminal case former special counsel Jack Smith brought against Trump in Washington, D.C., wrote in an order relating to one defendant that dismissing the case “cannot repair the jagged breach in America’s sacred tradition of peacefully transitioning power.”

EXCERPT

That's what I've been talking about.  These federal judges in the DC district formed a sort of "Star Chamber" cabal amongst themselves and colluded with Democrat prosecutors to go way beyond the Constitution and the law to administer their own "justice" against the J6 people.
aka "nasty degenerate SOB," "worst of the worst at Free Republic," "Garbage Troll," "Neocon Warmonger," "Filthy Piece of Trash," "damn $#%$#@!," "Silly f'er," "POS," "war pig," "neocon scumbag," "insignificant little ankle nipper," "@ss-clown," "neocuck," "termite," "Uniparty Deep stater," "Never Trump sack of dog feces," "avid Bidenista," "filthy Ukrainian," "war whore," "fricking chump," "psychopathic POS," "depraved SOB," "Never Trump Moron," "Lazarus," and "sock puppet."

"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."  ---George Orwell

Offline PeteS in CA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,534
Now that it's safe, these judges can speak their prejudice. Anyway:


I am not and never have been a leftist.

If, as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2021/robert-f-kennedy-jr-said-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-the-deadliest-vaccine-ever-made-thats-not-true/ , https://gospelnewsnetwork.org/2021/11/23/covid-shots-are-the-deadliest-vaccines-in-medical-history/ , The Vaccine is deadly, where in the US have Pfizer and Moderna hidden the millions of bodies of those who died of "vaccine injury"?

Millions now living should have died. Anti-Covid-Vaxxer ghouls hardest hit.

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,492
What did these judges have to say about prosecutors denying evidence to criminal defendants?
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline MeganC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,938
  • Gender: Female
  • Putin, the low rent Hitler
What did these judges have to say about prosecutors denying evidence to criminal defendants?

These Kafkaesque judges likely wanted to charge people with 'obstruction' for pleading not guilty.  9999hair out0000
Resistance to Jim Robinson is obedience to God.