Author Topic: Hispanic Caucus Chair: It Hurts ‘Law and Order’ if Sanctuary Cities Lose Public Safety Money  (Read 248 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 184,198
Hispanic Caucus Chair: It Hurts ‘Law and Order’ if Sanctuary Cities Lose Public Safety Money
 

Ian Hanchett23 Jan 2025530
 
On Thursday’s broadcast of “CNN News Central,” Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chair Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-NY) argued that it would be damaging to law and order if cities have their public safety funding taken away over their status as sanctuary cities as President Donald Trump has floated doing and also stated that no funding for any cities should be cut.

Co-host Boris Sanchez asked, “What is in place, Congressman, to stop funding from being offered to New York and other sanctuary cities, as the president is vowing he might do if they don’t go along with mass deportation?”


Espaillat answered, “Well, I am an appropriator. I sit on the Appropriations Committee, and we will be going through all funding possibilities. And, at that juncture, we will see what will be their efforts. To cut any type of funding to any city, I think is a mistake. Cities deserve to have public safety. You cannot cut funding for public safety because of this and allow…over 1,500 violent criminals, felons released into our communities, as the president just did. It is just contradictory. And if the Republican Party is the party of law and order, this is a grave mistake.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2025/01/23/hispanic-caucus-chair-it-hurts-law-and-order-if-sanctuary-cities-lose-funding/
abolitionist Frederick Douglass: “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will.”

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 184,198
Sanctuary city and "law and order" are oxymorons.  The last time democrats used the idea of "sanctuary cities and states" it was called cession. :im waiting:
abolitionist Frederick Douglass: “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will.”

Offline DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,333
  • Gender: Male
Why should the Federal fund provide money to state and local governments who are intentionally breaking Federal law?

Want the federal Government's money?  Play by the Federal Government's rules.

He who has the gold makes the rules.
"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it’s entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." - Alan Simpson, Frontline Video Interview

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,732
Fine, let's stop all money from the feds to state governments.

Each state fends for itself.

Which, BTW, is the way the Founders envisioned the Republic to operate, save for defense and foreign matters.
“You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.” Thomas Sowell