Author Topic: The Saturation effect questions the prevailing narrative on CO2  (Read 177 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 184,530
The Saturation effect questions the prevailing narrative on CO2
« on: January 19, 2025, 06:43:06 am »
The Saturation effect questions the prevailing narrative on CO2
6 hours ago Guest Blogger 
From CFACT

By Collister Johnson

The assertion that carbon dioxide is a “pollutant” has been the centerpiece of public policy on climate for the developed world in recent years.

Demonizing CO2 has impacted virtually every aspect of modern Western civilization. It condemns the burning of fossil fuels for electricity, the use of combustion engines for transportation, and the employment of carbon fuels for virtually everything supporting modern civilization – even down to the kind of washing machines and kitchen stoves that are deemed acceptable. It forms the basis for the most grotesque of all the alarmist shibboleths – the “social cost of carbon”.

The theory that CO2 is malevolent was enshrined in the so-called “Endangerment Finding” issued by the Environmental Protection Agency in 2009, which held that carbon dioxide is a “pollutant” that “threatens public health and safety”.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/01/18/the-saturation-effect-questions-the-prevailing-narrative-on-co2/
abolitionist Frederick Douglass: “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will.”