TOXIC LOYALTY PART 3 – DEFENDING LTG GILLAND’S CURRENT PERFORMANCE DUE TO HIS DISTANT, YOUTHFUL MILI

[rangerrebew]

TOXIC LOYALTY PART 3 – DEFENDING LTG GILLAND’S CURRENT PERFORMANCE DUE TO HIS DISTANT, YOUTHFUL MILITARY HEROICS
By John Hughes
January 11, 2025
Views: 2614
 
‘Toxic Loyalty’: “Blind loyalty to bad leaders and protected employees irrationally serves the ego—and has disastrous implications on company culture and the bottom line.” Toxic Loyalty, according to Fastcompany.com, has 3 general facets that can drive others to support generals irrationally: 
  1. Individuals who have been with the organization for a long time  
    2. Individuals who played a key part in the organization’s success at some point
  3. Individuals who are close friends or family members1

This article will focus on the past military heroics of today’s generals that is a likely basis for irrational support despite their current lack of adequate performance.

https://armedforces.press/toxic-loyalty-part-3-defending-ltg-gillands-current-performance-due-to-his-distant-youthful-military-heroics/

[rangerrebew]

Keeping "leaders" around based on past accomplishments is nothing but a form of DEI.  If that weren't true, one Benedict Arnold would be today considered a hero instead of a traitor as he was Washington's favorite general at one point.