Author Topic: The Saturation effect questions the prevailing narrative on CO2  (Read 288 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 188,435
The Saturation effect questions the prevailing narrative on CO2
« on: January 16, 2025, 07:36:31 am »
The Saturation effect questions the prevailing narrative on CO2
By
Collister Johnson
|
January 15th, 2025
 
The assertion that carbon dioxide is a “pollutant” has been the centerpiece of public policy on climate for the developed world in recent years.

Demonizing CO2 has impacted virtually every aspect of modern Western civilization. It condemns the burning of fossil fuels for electricity, the use of combustion engines for transportation, and the employment of carbon fuels for virtually everything supporting modern civilization – even down to the kind of washing machines and kitchen stoves that are deemed acceptable. It forms the basis for the most grotesque of all the alarmist shibboleths – the “social cost of carbon”.

The theory that CO2 is malevolent was enshrined in the so-called “Endangerment Finding” issued by the Environmental Protection Agency in 2009, which held that carbon dioxide is a “pollutant” that “threatens public health and safety”.

https://www.cfact.org/2025/01/15/the-saturation-effect-questions-the-prevailing-narrative-on-co2/
"A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within. " -- Ariel Durant