Author Topic: Takeaways from Pete Hegseth’s contentious confirmation hearing  (Read 206 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline libertybele

  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 64,998
  • Gender: Female
It was largely a smear campaign and I don't see him getting the votes needed.

Takeaways from Pete Hegseth’s contentious confirmation hearing

Pete Hegseth, Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the Pentagon, acknowledged Tuesday he is “not a perfect person” but was defiant in the face of multiple allegations surrounding his past conduct during a contentious confirmation hearing.

Hegseth dismissed the allegation that he sexually assaulted a woman in 2017 as false and part of a “coordinated smear campaign,” claiming that the attacks against him were an attempt to use him to also smear the president-elect.

Democrats pressed Hegseth on allegations of sexual misconduct and excessive drinking. In one particularly contentious exchange, Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia pressed Hegseth on his infidelity stemming from the 2017 incident in a Monterey, California, hotel room, which prompted a sexual assault investigation by local police that did not result in any charges.

Democratic senators also confronted Hegseth with his prior comments suggesting that women should not serve in combat roles, raising quotes from his book published last year.

Hegseth responded that women make “amazing contributions” to the military, arguing that his comments questioning women serving in combat were tied to the military’s standards and readiness.

Hegseth’s confirmation hearing Tuesday before the Senate Armed Services Committee is the first of a flurry of hearings for Trump’s Cabinet selections this week ahead of the president-elect’s inauguration on January 20. Hegseth’s hearing set a defiant tone for Trump’s nominees ahead of the multiple controversial hearings ahead for the Senate in the coming weeks.

Ultimately, Hegseth’s nomination to become the next secretary of defense will depend on how Republicans view his confirmation. Republicans have a 53-47 majority in the Senate, meaning he does not need any Democratic support to win confirmation so long as he doesn’t lose more than three Republicans.

Here are takeaways from Tuesday’s confirmation hearing:
Democrats press Hegseth on 2017 sexual assault allegation

Tuesday’s hearing was the first time for Democrats on the committee – Hegseth did not meet with any Democrats beyond ranking member Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island – to press Hegseth on the allegations of sexual assault, workplace drinking and financial mismanagement.

Sen. Mazie Hirono, a Hawaii Democrat, pressed Hegseth on the 2017 sexual assault investigation, asking if he’d ever faced discipline or entered into a settlement related to physical harassment or assault of a sexual nature.

“I was falsely accused in October of 2017, it was fully investigated, and I was completely cleared,” Hegseth said.

“I don’t think ‘completely cleared’ is accurate,” Hirono responded, noting his lawyer has said he entered into a non-disclosure agreement with his accuser as part of a settlement.

Kaine grilled Hegseth further, questioning the nominee’s judgement and pushing Hegseth to acknowledge his infidelity from the 2017 Monterey incident that he’s described as a consensual sexual encounter.

“Senator, I was falsely charged, fully investigated and completely cleared,” Hegseth responded..................

https://www.yahoo.com/news/takeaways-pete-hegseth-contentious-confirmation-185445776.html

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 61,103
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Re: Takeaways from Pete Hegseth’s contentious confirmation hearing
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2025, 05:55:10 pm »
For a bunch of people who tend to lead with their sexual orientation and crow about their particular perversions, the Democrats sure have fits about someone engaging in straight sex (well if they are a Republican, anyway).
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis

Offline Timber Rattler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,763
  • Conservative Purist and Patriot
Re: Takeaways from Pete Hegseth’s contentious confirmation hearing
« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2025, 06:43:55 pm »
LOL! 

https://twitter.com/i/status/1879250836842586222

I have to admit, at first I was dubious about Pete but he has grown on me, and after today's swamp circus with the Democratic Shrieking Sisterhood of Harpies (H/T to Hot Air), I absolutely certain that he's the right man for the right job at the right time!
aka "nasty degenerate SOB," "worst of the worst at Free Republic," "Garbage Troll," "Neocon Warmonger," "Filthy Piece of Trash," "damn $#%$#@!," "Silly f'er," "POS," "war pig," "neocon scumbag," "insignificant little ankle nipper," "@ss-clown," "neocuck," "termite," "Uniparty Deep stater," "Never Trump sack of dog feces," "avid Bidenista," "filthy Ukrainian," "war whore," "fricking chump," "psychopathic POS," "depraved SOB," "Never Trump Moron," "Lazarus," and "sock puppet."

"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."  ---George Orwell