Author Topic: 2024: The Year of Bad Science  (Read 516 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 185,854
2024: The Year of Bad Science
« on: January 06, 2025, 06:39:32 am »
2024: The Year of Bad Science
January 1st, 2025 by KlimaNachrichten Editor


Perhaps between 2030 and 2040 we will think back to the happy 2020s. Namely, if the cost estimate of the Fraunhofer Institute in Freiburg should become reality. A study from Freiburg is currently being discussed on social media. The billions already spent seem downright ridiculous compared to the future costs.

The researchers estimate the annual costs of the transition on page 79 of their study as follows:

The costs of the transformation compared to the continuation of today's

systems in the "technology-open" scenario amount to an average of the next

25 years to around €52 billion per year. This corresponds to around 1.2% of today's

Gross domestic product.
 

• In the years 2030 to 2040, the highest amounts of around €250 billion per year will be

investments in the transformation of the energy system and the necessary

Infrastructure needed.
 

• By reducing demand in the "efficiency" scenario, the total costs of the

energy system by €630 billion by 2045 compared to the scenario

"open to technology".
 

• Persistent behavior leads to a similar cost increase as the construction

a robust energy system that is more resilient to geopolitical influences

and climate change.
 

• In the "technology-open" scenario, there are average

CO2 avoidance costs of just under €220 per tonne of CO2, in the "efficiency" scenario

just under €90 per tonne of CO2 and €320 in the "persistence" scenario.

https://klimanachrichten.de/2025/01/01/2024-das-jahr-der-schlechten-wissenschaft/
By means of shrewd lies, unremittingly repeated, it is possible to make people believe that heaven is hell - and hell heaven. The greater the lie, the more readily it will be believed.

Adolf Hitler  (and democrats)
   
The receptivity of the masses is very limited, their intelligence is small, but their power of forgetting is enormous. In consequence of these facts, all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public understands what you want him to understand by your slogan.

Adolf Hitler (and democrats)