Author Topic: 'Green' ferry emits more CO2 than old diesel ship  (Read 234 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 176,857
'Green' ferry emits more CO2 than old diesel ship
« on: January 01, 2025, 08:12:12 am »
'Green' ferry emits more CO2 than old diesel ship
23 hours ago
 
Calum Watson
BBC News Scotland
 
Glen Sannox brings greater car capacity to the Arran route but a bigger carbon footprint
The carbon footprint of a long-delayed new "green" ferry will be far larger than the 31-year-old diesel ship that usually serves the route between the Scottish mainland and the island of Arran.

An emissions analysis by CalMac has calculated MV Glen Sannox will emit 10,391 equivalent tonnes of CO2 a year compared with 7,732 for MV Caledonian Isles.

The dual-fuel ferry has more car capacity but requires larger engines which also emit methane, a greenhouse gas with a far greater global warming effect than CO2.

Ferries procurement agency CMAL, which owns the ship, said the comparison was "inaccurate" as Glen Sannox is a larger vessel.


The size of Glen Sannox is a factor in its carbon footprint, but so too is the liquified natural gas (LNG) fuel which is less climate-friendly than previously claimed.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy87e72yg3o
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 61,091
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Re: 'Green' ferry emits more CO2 than old diesel ship
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2025, 04:42:45 am »
Greater capacity is only meaningful if it is fully utilized.

If so, the new vessel will emit 81.81 tonnes per year per vehicle transported, while the old one emits some 85.91 tonnes per vehicle per year at capacity.

But if the new vessel isn't full, and transports fewer vehicles than capacity, the carbon per vehicle per year will rely on some average number of vehicles, and be greater than the loaded to capacity figures for the old vessel

Of course, this does not take into account construction of the new vessel nor harbor modifications which will be required. The equation is never complete, and if they just wanted a new boat they should have just said so instead of wanking in all this nonsense about carbon footprints in the water.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis