Author Topic: Climatologists Shocked By Nature Op-Ed Arguing Objectivity In Climate Science Is Problematic  (Read 369 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 184,501
Climatologists Shocked By Nature Op-Ed Arguing Objectivity In Climate Science Is Problematic

"Keeping feelings separate from research is fundamental to the foundational principles of science."
by Kevin Killough  Nov 13, 2024
 
protest 15 degrees

Three climate researchers took to the pages of Nature to argue that objectivity in climate science is problematic because it hinders their political advocacy, which they argue is too important to deny. [emphasis, links added]

Therefore, the authors argue, the values of objectivity in scientific research should be reconsidered.


“The public has watched as national and sub-national governments have declared climate emergencies, all the while continuing to grant new permits for the extraction of fossil fuels, seemingly ignoring increasingly urgent scientific messages that this locks the world into passing 1.5 °C of warming above preindustrial levels by 2030, if not sooner,” the researchers explain.

https://climatechangedispatch.com/climatologists-shocked-by-nature-op-ed-arguing-objectivity-in-climate-science-is-problematic/
abolitionist Frederick Douglass: “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will.”

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 184,501
Injecting emotions into research is the "NEW" science of liberalism.  Old research is so boring, and you only deal with facts. *****rollingeyes*****
« Last Edit: November 15, 2024, 07:25:47 am by rangerrebew »
abolitionist Frederick Douglass: “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will.”