Scientific American Editor-In-Chief Has Spectacular Post-Election Social Media Meltdown
Subsequently, Laura Helmuth disavowed her screed and vitriol. Unfortunately, it is a sign that too many scientists would rather offer elitist insults then address reasonable concerns and different ideas.
Posted by Leslie Eastman Saturday, November 9, 2024 at 10:00am 44 Comments
I have been following Scientific American’s steady decline, both in terms of its handling of science and its actual support of policies helpful to this nation.
A few of my recent articles show that progressive ideology has pretty much captured this once-respected publication.
Scientific American Article Claims There’s No Difference Between Male, Female Athletes
Scientific American Covers Itself with Shame Again, This Time by Using Term ‘Birthing Parent’
Scientific American is Now the Bud Light of Science Journals
Scientific American Colludes with Other Major Media to Normalize ‘Climate Emergency’ Terminology
One of the primary reasons this descent into madness has accelerated is that the editor-in-chief, Laura Helmuth, has allowed pseudoscience and narratives to flow unfiltered with little if any restraint.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2024/11/scientific-american-editor-in-chief-has-spectacular-post-election-social-media-meltdown/