Author Topic: California Gov. Newsom Signs Law Empowering Bureaucrats To Meddle Even More With Oil Refiners  (Read 2671 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 176,735


California Gov. Newsom Signs Law Empowering Bureaucrats To Meddle Even More With Oil Refiners
Story by Nick Pope - DCNF • 20h


Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom enacted a law Monday that will empower state bureaucrats to monitor and dictate inventory levels at oil refineries in an attempt to prevent gas price hikes.

Newsom signed ABX2-1, which will enable regulators to require oil companies to keep a minimum level of fuel on hand and permit the California Energy Commission (CEC) to mandate refiners to make plans to provide resupply during outages for maintenance. While proponents say the bill is a key step to prevent major corporations from gouging consumers with artificially high prices at the pump during periods of low supply, industry interests have slammed the bill as political hostility directed at the oil and gas industry.
 

“With this new law, big oil companies are now responsible for stabilizing prices at the pump. It’s a critical accomplishment, but our work is not done,” California Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, a Democrat, said of the new law. “I will continue to fight to lower the cost of living, because housing, groceries and everyday necessities must be more affordable for all Californians.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/california-gov-newsom-signs-law-empowering-bureaucrats-to-meddle-even-more-with-oil-refiners/ar-AA1sjpRR?ocid=widgetonlockscreen&cvid=bf81c97b9c0a4a06a38b38ca62d34366&ei=106
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,888
Not to worry.

At some point there will be no refining in the state, and California will be importing all its gasoline from some foreign land.
“You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.” Thomas Sowell

Online Wingnut

  • The problem with everything is they try and make it better without realizing the old way is fine.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,251
  • Gender: Male
EV's will save Cali.  They don't need gas or oil.
You don’t become cooler with age but you do care progressively less about being cool, which is the only true way to actually be cool.

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,888
EV's will save Cali.  They don't need gas or oil.
“You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.” Thomas Sowell

Online catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,272
  • Gender: Male
Easy solution, and I remember when my company had a large presence in CA.

All the Majors need to get the hell out, and then let Newsome, and the rest of Californians pay almost double dealing with small players, with less competition.  These secondary companies will require larger profit margins, and those increases will be funneled down to the consumers.

No or few refineries?, get ready for a tacked on incremental fees for distribution.

I hate to sound callous,  but  CA elected this disaster, and they  just need to deal with the consequences.
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.

Online Wingnut

  • The problem with everything is they try and make it better without realizing the old way is fine.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,251
  • Gender: Male
Easy solution, and I remember when my company had a large presence in CA.

All the Majors need to get the hell out, and then let Newsome, and the rest of Californians pay almost double dealing with small players, with less competition.  These secondary companies will require larger profit margins, and those increases will be funneled down to the consumers.

No or few refineries?, get ready for a tacked on incremental fees for distribution.

I hate to sound callous,  but  CA elected this disaster, and they  just need to deal with the consequences.

Bingo.  and it is coming fast.

The light at the end of the tunnel in Cali is an oncoming freight train.
You don’t become cooler with age but you do care progressively less about being cool, which is the only true way to actually be cool.

Offline GrouchoTex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,362
  • Gender: Male
Easy solution, and I remember when my company had a large presence in CA.

All the Majors need to get the hell out, and then let Newsome, and the rest of Californians pay almost double dealing with small players, with less competition.  These secondary companies will require larger profit margins, and those increases will be funneled down to the consumers.

No or few refineries?, get ready for a tacked on incremental fees for distribution.

I hate to sound callous,  but  CA elected this disaster, and they  just need to deal with the consequences.

Once upon a time, the Signal hill area in Southern California out produced the rest of the country.
Early 20th century, but it happened.
Sad to see how short-sighted the government has become.
My brother once worked in a refinery in Paramount.

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,263
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
EV's will save Cali.  They don't need gas or oil.

Do EVs have bearings? How about tires? Where does the power to charge them come from? How long does it take to charge one? ... Asking for a friend?
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Online catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,272
  • Gender: Male
Do EVs have bearings? How about tires? Where does the power to charge them come from? How long does it take to charge one? ... Asking for a friend?

My summer house here, is in a pure "toss-up" political area, and I actually see EV charging stations.

Problem is.......   12 stations, no waiting.  In fact I've never seen a car charging at one of these.
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,263
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
My summer house here, is in a pure "toss-up" political area, and I actually see EV charging stations.

Problem is.......   12 stations, no waiting.  In fact I've never seen a car charging at one of these.

If I were to decide to drive from East Texas to Southern Arizona in an EV how long would that trip take me including stops for charging the batteries? Assume perfect driving conditions all the way.
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Online catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,272
  • Gender: Male
If I were to decide to drive from East Texas to Southern Arizona in an EV how long would that trip take me including stops for charging the batteries? Assume perfect driving conditions all the way.

I'd be the last on earth to buy an EV.  My guess is as good as yours. 
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,263
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
I'd be the last on earth to buy an EV.  My guess is as good as yours.

I will never know either because I make that trip at least once a year.
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,888
Easy solution, and I remember when my company had a large presence in CA.

All the Majors need to get the hell out, and then let Newsome, and the rest of Californians pay almost double dealing with small players, with less competition.  These secondary companies will require larger profit margins, and those increases will be funneled down to the consumers.

No or few refineries?, get ready for a tacked on incremental fees for distribution.

I hate to sound callous,  but  CA elected this disaster, and they  just need to deal with the consequences.
You are not callous, as the citizens of the sovereign state of California are free to make those choices.
But as long as we are a Constitutional Republic and not a democracy,  the rest of us do not have to live that way.

In the 70s it was "Let them freeze in the dark"

We now can modify it by saying 'Let them drive their EVs without power"
« Last Edit: October 16, 2024, 05:23:49 pm by IsailedawayfromFR »
“You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.” Thomas Sowell

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 61,054
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
You pays your money, you takes your choice.

I hope they can get the sh*t off the sidewalks before everyone there has to walk.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis

Offline DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,210
  • Gender: Male
What about inventory rundowns when they make the Government mandated switch over from Summer blend gasoline to Winter blend gasoline?

What about refinery maintenance?

The reason gas prices are high in California is because the California State Government mandated a state proprietary blend of gasoline that is only produced by a few California refineries.  Gas prices could be lower if they could bring in gasoline from Oregon, Nevada, and Arizona, but those blends are not "clean enough" for Cali.
"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it’s entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." - Alan Simpson, Frontline Video Interview

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,888
The reason gas prices are high in California is because the California State Government mandated a state proprietary blend of gasoline that is only produced by a few California refineries.  Gas prices could be lower if they could bring in gasoline from Oregon, Nevada, and Arizona, but those blends are not "clean enough" for Cali.
could this also be a reason gasoline prices are so high there?

“You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.” Thomas Sowell

Online Wingnut

  • The problem with everything is they try and make it better without realizing the old way is fine.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,251
  • Gender: Male
Easy solution, and I remember when my company had a large presence in CA.

All the Majors need to get the hell out, and then let Newsome, and the rest of Californians pay almost double dealing with small players, with less competition.  These secondary companies will require larger profit margins, and those increases will be funneled down to the consumers.

No or few refineries?, get ready for a tacked on incremental fees for distribution.

I hate to sound callous,  but  CA elected this disaster, and they  just need to deal with the consequences.

@catfish1957

Well looky here:  https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/oil-company-phillips-66-says-235117942.html


LOS ANGELES (AP) — Oil company Phillips 66 announced Wednesday that it plans to shut down a Los Angeles-area refinery by the end of 2025, citing market concerns.

The refinery accounts for about 8% of California's refining capacity, according to the state's Energy Commission. The company said it will remain operating in the state.

“With the long-term sustainability of our Los Angeles Refinery uncertain and affected by market dynamics, we are working with leading land development firms to evaluate the future use of our unique and strategically located properties near the Port of Los Angeles,” CEO Mark Lashier said in a statement. “Phillips 66 remains committed to serving California and will continue to take the necessary steps to meet our commercial and customer demands.”

The closure will impact 600 employees and 300 contractors who help operate the refinery, the company said in a news release. The refinery consists of two facilities that were built more than a century ago.

The announcement comes days after Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a law aimed at preventing gas prices from spiking at the pump. The law authorizes energy regulators to require refineries to maintain a certain level of fuel on hand. The goal is to avoid sudden increases in gas prices when refineries go offline for maintenance.
You don’t become cooler with age but you do care progressively less about being cool, which is the only true way to actually be cool.

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,888
@catfish1957

Well looky here:  https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/oil-company-phillips-66-says-235117942.html


LOS ANGELES (AP) — Oil company Phillips 66 announced Wednesday that it plans to shut down a Los Angeles-area refinery by the end of 2025, citing market concerns.

The refinery accounts for about 8% of California's refining capacity, according to the state's Energy Commission. The company said it will remain operating in the state.

“With the long-term sustainability of our Los Angeles Refinery uncertain and affected by market dynamics, we are working with leading land development firms to evaluate the future use of our unique and strategically located properties near the Port of Los Angeles,” CEO Mark Lashier said in a statement. “Phillips 66 remains committed to serving California and will continue to take the necessary steps to meet our commercial and customer demands.”

The closure will impact 600 employees and 300 contractors who help operate the refinery, the company said in a news release. The refinery consists of two facilities that were built more than a century ago.

The announcement comes days after Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a law aimed at preventing gas prices from spiking at the pump. The law authorizes energy regulators to require refineries to maintain a certain level of fuel on hand. The goal is to avoid sudden increases in gas prices when refineries go offline for maintenance.
Still will be a mess for Phillips as the state will exert maximum pressure to 'clean up' the shutdown plant.

Years ago I was part of an analysis of a major as to whether to shutdown or operate several money-losing refineries.

Based upon enormous abandonment and reclamation costs, we chose to continue losing money as, although it was 'kicking the can down the road', it was clearly less expensive in the long run.

Imagine how stringent CA will be to the legacy refiners there who choose to close down refineries. 

It will be a nightmare for Phillips and others as it will take billions and billions to restore the land where the refineries have been operating for many decades, and under changed environmental conditions.  What once was permitted is now illegal, but must be now cleaned up regardless.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2024, 05:41:44 pm by IsailedawayfromFR »
“You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.” Thomas Sowell

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 61,054
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Still will be a mess for Phillips as the state will exert maximum pressure to 'clean up' the shutdown plant.

Years ago I was part of an analysis of a major as to whether to shutdown or operate several money-losing refineries.

Based upon enormous abandonment and reclamation costs, we chose to continue losing money as, although it was 'kicking the can down the road', it was clearly less expensive in the long run.

Imagine how stringent CA will be to the legacy refiners there who choose to close down refineries. 

It will be a nightmare for Phillips and others as it will take billions and billions to restore the land where the refineries have been operating for many decades, and under changed environmental conditions.  What once was permitted is now illegal, but must be now cleaned up regardless.
Nothing you have said here is in error. The lesson for the future may well be to either fight hard for less ridiculous regulation, or to move early...

Here, an old, small, refinery was literally dismantled and sold to an African country. Packed it up and shipped it out, but the environmental monitoring/remediation (mainly from spillage over its decades of operation) continues. The rules have become more stringent since, mainly to prevent the need for the sort of remediation that has happened at that site.

I have little doubt that the list of toxic substances has grown, and tolerable levels dropped (how clean is clean?) in the time the refinery has been there, so the 'kick the can' approach only got Phillips in deeper. At some point they were doomed to 'bite the bullet' either way.Best to get out before California adds another volume to the list of things known to cause cancer there. (I read labels...)
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis

Offline Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,204
Legal Insurrection by Leslie Eastman 10/18/2024

The unintended consequences are already beginning, as Phillips 66 to cease operations at Los Angeles-area refinery.

Legal Insurrection readers may recall a post I did in September, reporting that California Governor Gavin Newsom was forcing the California Assembly into a special session to push through legislation requiring oil companies to amass stockpiles of gasoline and other fuels to prevent supply shortages and price spikes during refinery outages.

The proposed measure has now become law.

    The new legislation was inspired by findings from the state’s Division of Petroleum Market Oversight that showed that gas price spikes are largely caused by increases in global crude oil prices and unplanned refinery outages.

    The law gives energy regulators the authority to require that refineries keep a certain amount of fuel on hand. The goal is to try to keep prices from increasing suddenly when refineries go offline for maintenance. Proponents say it would save Californians billions of dollars at the pump.

    Newsom joined lawmakers at the state Capitol to sign the law and criticized the oil industry for its efforts to keep the legislation from passing.

The legislation gives another state bureaucracy enormous power over our energy producers.

    When the bill takes effect in 90 days, a state regulatory agency, the California Energy Commission, will have the authority to set constraints on storage levels for each refiner, each fuel and each blending component, per the bill. The agency will also be able to adjust inventory minimums, as well as establish conditions under which refiners can draw down or rebuild reserves.

More: https://legalinsurrection.com/2024/10/ca-gov-newsom-signs-law-forcing-oil-companies-to-stockpile-fuel/

Offline andy58-in-nh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,599
  • Gender: Male
What's next: Directive 10-289 or the  "Anti-dog-eat-dog rule"?
"The most terrifying force of death, comes from the hands of Men who wanted to be left Alone. They try, so very hard, to mind their own business and provide for themselves and those they love. They resist every impulse to fight back, knowing the forced and permanent change of life that will come from it. They know, that the moment they fight back, their lives as they have lived them, are over. -Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,888
I have little doubt that the list of toxic substances has grown, and tolerable levels dropped (how clean is clean?)
Just to demonstrate the moving goalposts the EPA establishes, look at the historical limits of particulates.
How can anyone forecast how to be within the arbitrary limits?


https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/timeline-particulate-matter-pm-national-ambient-air-quality-standards-naaqs
Timeline of Particulate Matter (PM) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
History of the NAAQS for Particulate Matter, from 1971 to 2024
Final Rule/Decision   Primary/Secondary   Indicator1   Averaging Time   Level2   Form
1971

36 FR 8186
Apr 30, 1971   Primary   TSP   24 hour   260 µg/m3   Not to be exceeded more than once per year
1971

36 FR 8186
Apr 30, 1971   Primary   TSP   Annual   75 µg/m3   Annual geometric mean
1971

36 FR 8186
Apr 30, 1971   Secondary   TSP   24 hour   150 µg/m3   Not to be exceeded more than once per year
1971

36 FR 8186
Apr 30, 1971   Secondary   TSP   Annual   60 µg/m3   Annual geometric mean
1987

52 FR 24634
Jul 1, 1987   Primary and Secondary   PM10   24 hour   150 µg/m3   Not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over a 3-year period
1987

52 FR 24634
Jul 1, 1987   Primary and Secondary   PM10   Annual   50 µg/m3   Annual arithmetic mean, averaged over 3 years
1997

62 FR 38652
Jul 18, 1997   Primary and Secondary   PM2.5   24 hour   65 µg/m3   98th percentile, averaged over 3 years
1997

62 FR 38652
Jul 18, 1997   Primary and Secondary   PM2.5   Annual   15.0 µg/m3   Annual arithmetic mean, averaged over 3 years  3, 4
1997

62 FR 38652
Jul 18, 1997   Primary and Secondary   PM10   24 hour   150 µg/m3   Initially promulgated 99th percentile, averaged over 3 years; when 1997 standards for PM10 were vacated, the form of 1987 standards remained in place (not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over a 3-year period) 5
1997

62 FR 38652
Jul 18, 1997   Primary and Secondary   PM10   Annual   50 µg/m3   Annual arithmetic mean, averaged over 3 years
2006

71 FR 61144
Oct 17, 2006   
Primary and Secondary

PM2.5   24 hour   35 µg/m3   98th percentile, averaged over 3 years 6
2006

71 FR 61144
Oct 17, 2006   Primary and Secondary   PM2.5   Annual   15.0 µg/m3   Annual arithmetic mean, averaged over 3 years 2, 7
2006

71 FR 61144
Oct 17, 2006   Primary and Secondary   PM10   24 hour   150 µg/m3   Not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over a 3-year period
2012

78 FR 3085
Jan 15, 2013   Primary   PM2.5   Annual   12.0 µg/m3   Annual arithmetic mean, averaged over 3 years 2, 7
2012

78 FR 3085
Jan 15, 2013   Secondary   PM2.5   Annual   15.0 µg/m3   Annual arithmetic mean, averaged over 3 years 2, 7
2012

78 FR 3085
Jan 15, 2013   Primary and Secondary   PM2.5   24 hour   35 µg/m3   98th percentile, averaged over 3 years 6
2012

78 FR 3085
Jan 15, 2013   Primary and Secondary   PM10   24 hour 8   150 µg/m3   Not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over a 3-year period
2020

85 FR 82684 Dec 18, 2020

Primary and secondary standards retained, without revision.
2024   Primary   PM2.5   Annual   9.0 µg/m3   Annual arithmetic mean, averaged over 3 years 2, 7
2024

Secondary PM2.5 standards, and primary and secondary PM10 standards, retained without revision.
1. TSP = Total Suspended Particles

2. Units of measure are micrograms per cubic meter of air (µg/m3).

3. The level of the annual standard is defined to one decimal place (i.e., 15.0 µg/m3) as determined by rounding.  For example, a 3-year average annual mean of 15.04 µg/m3 would round to 15.0 µg/m3 and, thus, meet the annual standard and a 3-year average of 15.05 µg/m3 would round to 15.1 µg/m3 and, hence, violate the annual standard (40 CFR part 50 Appendix N).

4. The level of the standard was to be compared to measurements made at sites that represent “community-wide air quality” recording the highest level, or, if specific requirements were satisfied, to average measurements from multiple community-wide air quality monitoring sites (“spatial averaging”).

5. See 69 FR 45592, July 30, 2004.

6. The level of the 24-hour standard is defined as an integer (zero decimal places) as determined by rounding.  For example, a 3-year average 98th percentile concentration of 35.49 µg/m3 would round to 35 µg/m3 and thus meet the 24-hour standard and a 3-year average of 35.50 µg/m3 would round to 36 and, hence, violate the 24-hour standard (40 CFR part 50 Appendix N).

7. The EPA tightened the constraints on the spatial averaging criteria by further limiting the conditions under which some areas may average measurements from multiple community-oriented monitors to determine compliance (see 71 FR 61165 - 61167).

8. The EPA revoked the annual PM10 NAAQS in 2006.
“You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.” Thomas Sowell

Online catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,272
  • Gender: Male
Just to demonstrate the moving goalposts the EPA establishes, look at the historical limits of particulates.
How can anyone forecast how to be within the arbitrary limits?


https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/timeline-particulate-matter-pm-national-ambient-air-quality-standards-naaqs
Timeline of Particulate Matter (PM) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
History of the NAAQS for Particulate Matter, from 1971 to 2024
Final Rule/Decision   Primary/Secondary   Indicator1   Averaging Time   Level2   Form
1971

36 FR 8186
Apr 30, 1971   Primary   TSP   24 hour   260 µg/m3   Not to be exceeded more than once per year
1971

36 FR 8186
Apr 30, 1971   Primary   TSP   Annual   75 µg/m3   Annual geometric mean
1971

36 FR 8186
Apr 30, 1971   Secondary   TSP   24 hour   150 µg/m3   Not to be exceeded more than once per year
1971

36 FR 8186
Apr 30, 1971   Secondary   TSP   Annual   60 µg/m3   Annual geometric mean
1987

52 FR 24634
Jul 1, 1987   Primary and Secondary   PM10   24 hour   150 µg/m3   Not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over a 3-year period
1987

52 FR 24634
Jul 1, 1987   Primary and Secondary   PM10   Annual   50 µg/m3   Annual arithmetic mean, averaged over 3 years
1997

62 FR 38652
Jul 18, 1997   Primary and Secondary   PM2.5   24 hour   65 µg/m3   98th percentile, averaged over 3 years
1997

62 FR 38652
Jul 18, 1997   Primary and Secondary   PM2.5   Annual   15.0 µg/m3   Annual arithmetic mean, averaged over 3 years  3, 4
1997

62 FR 38652
Jul 18, 1997   Primary and Secondary   PM10   24 hour   150 µg/m3   Initially promulgated 99th percentile, averaged over 3 years; when 1997 standards for PM10 were vacated, the form of 1987 standards remained in place (not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over a 3-year period) 5
1997

62 FR 38652
Jul 18, 1997   Primary and Secondary   PM10   Annual   50 µg/m3   Annual arithmetic mean, averaged over 3 years
2006

71 FR 61144
Oct 17, 2006   
Primary and Secondary

PM2.5   24 hour   35 µg/m3   98th percentile, averaged over 3 years 6
2006

71 FR 61144
Oct 17, 2006   Primary and Secondary   PM2.5   Annual   15.0 µg/m3   Annual arithmetic mean, averaged over 3 years 2, 7
2006

71 FR 61144
Oct 17, 2006   Primary and Secondary   PM10   24 hour   150 µg/m3   Not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over a 3-year period
2012

78 FR 3085
Jan 15, 2013   Primary   PM2.5   Annual   12.0 µg/m3   Annual arithmetic mean, averaged over 3 years 2, 7
2012

78 FR 3085
Jan 15, 2013   Secondary   PM2.5   Annual   15.0 µg/m3   Annual arithmetic mean, averaged over 3 years 2, 7
2012

78 FR 3085
Jan 15, 2013   Primary and Secondary   PM2.5   24 hour   35 µg/m3   98th percentile, averaged over 3 years 6
2012

78 FR 3085
Jan 15, 2013   Primary and Secondary   PM10   24 hour 8   150 µg/m3   Not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over a 3-year period
2020

85 FR 82684 Dec 18, 2020

Primary and secondary standards retained, without revision.
2024   Primary   PM2.5   Annual   9.0 µg/m3   Annual arithmetic mean, averaged over 3 years 2, 7
2024

Secondary PM2.5 standards, and primary and secondary PM10 standards, retained without revision.
1. TSP = Total Suspended Particles

2. Units of measure are micrograms per cubic meter of air (µg/m3).

3. The level of the annual standard is defined to one decimal place (i.e., 15.0 µg/m3) as determined by rounding.  For example, a 3-year average annual mean of 15.04 µg/m3 would round to 15.0 µg/m3 and, thus, meet the annual standard and a 3-year average of 15.05 µg/m3 would round to 15.1 µg/m3 and, hence, violate the annual standard (40 CFR part 50 Appendix N).

4. The level of the standard was to be compared to measurements made at sites that represent “community-wide air quality” recording the highest level, or, if specific requirements were satisfied, to average measurements from multiple community-wide air quality monitoring sites (“spatial averaging”).

5. See 69 FR 45592, July 30, 2004.

6. The level of the 24-hour standard is defined as an integer (zero decimal places) as determined by rounding.  For example, a 3-year average 98th percentile concentration of 35.49 µg/m3 would round to 35 µg/m3 and thus meet the 24-hour standard and a 3-year average of 35.50 µg/m3 would round to 36 and, hence, violate the 24-hour standard (40 CFR part 50 Appendix N).

7. The EPA tightened the constraints on the spatial averaging criteria by further limiting the conditions under which some areas may average measurements from multiple community-oriented monitors to determine compliance (see 71 FR 61165 - 61167).

8. The EPA revoked the annual PM10 NAAQS in 2006.

Are you trying to give me bad flashbacks?   :silly:
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,888
Are you trying to give me bad flashbacks?   :silly:
Well, it did make your old job very secure, and had the added benefit of encouraging you to retire early.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZPxkEa1_00
« Last Edit: October 18, 2024, 12:19:24 pm by IsailedawayfromFR »
“You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.” Thomas Sowell

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,334
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
California has told the oil companies what their future will become by remaining in that state.

It's up to the oil companies now.
Brings to mind that line from "Robocop":
"Your move, creep..."
« Last Edit: October 18, 2024, 06:09:18 pm by Fishrrman »