Author Topic: Democrats Want To Dismantle The Constitution  (Read 515 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,210
Democrats Want To Dismantle The Constitution
« on: October 09, 2024, 08:19:34 pm »
Lawrence Person's BattleSwarm Blog 10/9/2024

Democrats have long hated constitutional limits on their will-to-power, and have actively tried to circumvent it at least as far back as Franklin D. Roosevelt’s court-packing scheme in 1937. Their active opposition to the Second Amendment, a barrier to their unwavering goal of complete civilian disarmament, is long established. But while Democrats have long hated the strictures of the Constitution, they were previously too circumspect to just come out and say they wanted to do away with it. In their panic at the specter of Orange Man Bad winning yet again, they’ve started saying the quiet part out loud about wanting to dismantle all the constitutional checks and balances that stand in their way.

•  We already covered how John Kerry laments that pesky First Amendment keeps global governments from supressing “disinformation.”

“Our First Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to be able to hammer [disinformation] out of existence. What we need is to win…the right to govern by hopefully winning enough votes that you’re free to be able to implement change,” Kerry said.

Kerry noted, “It’s very hard to govern today.”

Just the way the founders intended.

•  Leftist fossil Fran Leibowitz went Kerry one better, saying that Biden should just dissolve the Supreme Court. I must have missed the day in civics class where the president is given the power to “dissolve” the Supreme Court. Or else Leibowitz was absent the day they covered the difference between a Republic and a dictatorship. Then again, she was evidently expelled from high school, so that may explain this peculiar lacunae in her understanding of basic American civics…

•  Finally, just today, Tim Waltz said we should eliminate the electoral college.

Minnesota governor Tim Walz on Tuesday reiterated his support for abolishing the Electoral College and switching to a national popular vote as the sole means of electing presidents and their running mates.

While campaigning for Vice President Kamala Harris on the West Coast, Walz suggested at two different fundraisers that he would prefer to focus on winning votes across the country rather than concentrate on key battleground states that could sway the upcoming presidential election as they have done in the past.

More: https://www.battleswarmblog.com/?p=60743

Online bigheadfred

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,422
  • Gender: Male
  • One day Closer
Re: Democrats Want To Dismantle The Constitution
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2024, 08:47:50 pm »
 :bkmk:
She asked me name my foe then. I said the need within some men to fight and kill their brothers without thought of Love or God. Ken Hensley

Online jafo2010

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,119
  • Dems-greatest existential threat to USA republic!
Re: Democrats Want To Dismantle The Constitution
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2024, 05:04:00 am »
The Constitution exists in name only.

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,346
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: Democrats Want To Dismantle The Constitution
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2024, 06:51:48 pm »
Well, I think it's time to literally "RE-constitute" the Constitution myself.

There are too many omissions, circumstances The Founders could never have foreseen, and some outright total mistakes.

Example of "an outright mistake":
To include the term "natural born citizen" without also including specific language defining what one is.

Example of a "circumstance that could not be foreseen":
That states (given the Constitutional right to set their own election rules) would indeed CREATE "rules" that have the effect of undermining those elections in their states, such as ranked-choice voting, mail-in ballots, non-citizen voting, etc.
Au contraire, the ground rules for ALL elections -- from dog catcher "on up" -- should have been specified for ALL states right in the Constitution, where they could not be challenged or easily changed.

That's my opinion and I'm stickin' to it.