Walz’s Answer On Basic Question Demonstrates Why He And Harris Shouldn't Be Allowed Anywhere Near Power
Derek Hunter
No one would ever accuse Kamala Harris or Tim Walz of being brilliant after hearing them speak. “Word salad” does not begin to do justice to whatever it is they let spring forward from their mouths or wherever those noises are emanating from. Let’s just say that they’d both be picked last if you were drafting a bar trivia team.
If you needed another example of what passes for intellect over on MSNBC, look no further than the Vice Presidential debate Tuesday night. While everything Walz said made less sense than the design of a platypus, let’s just dissect one question that should have been easy to address, but turned into a stream of verbal diarrhea scientists will never be able to make sense out of.
At issue was the lie Walz has told for years about how he was in Hong Kong for the Tiananmen Square massacre, which he was not. There was no reason for the lie, at least nothing practical. China is gigantic, Hong Kong is nowhere near Tiananmen Square and was controlled by Great Britain at the time, so it wasn’t even really part of China. But by putting himself near the mix, Walz was doing what he’s done his whole life – trying to get implied importance by proxy.
more
https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2024/10/03/walzs-answer-on-basic-question-demonstrates-why-he-and-harris-shouldnt-be-allowed-anywhere-near-power-n2645667
