Author Topic: Huge Development In Maine Narrows Kamala’s Path To Victory  (Read 401 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online 240B

  • Lord of all things Orange!
  • TBR Advisory Committee
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,420
  • I refuse to be obstinate!
    • I try my best ...
Huge Development In Maine Narrows Kamala’s Path To Victory
« on: September 20, 2024, 12:33:53 pm »

Huge Development In Maine Narrows Kamala’s Path To Victory

Trending Politics
Mark Steffen
September 20, 2024

The electoral math of Maine just became a little tougher for Vice President Kamala Harris as a swing district with precious electoral votes appears to be slipping away.

Maine Democrats on Friday acknowledged that they may not have enough time to change their delegate apportionment rules in the wake of a sly move by Nebraska Republicans to do the same to benefit former President Donald Trump. Each state allots a portion of its delegates based on which presidential candidates wins its respective congressional districts. The admission was made by Democratic House Majority Leader Maureen Terry who on Friday told The Bulwark that it’s “very likely” her party missed the window to make the change. That could greatly narrow Harris’s path to the presidency.

(more)
https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/breaking-surprising-development-in-maine-greatly-narrows-kamala-harris-path-to-victory-mstef/
You cannot "COEXIST" with people who want to kill you.
If they kill their own with no conscience, there is nothing to stop them from killing you.
Rational fear and anger at vicious murderous Islamic terrorists is the same as irrational antisemitism, according to the Leftists

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,356
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: Huge Development In Maine Narrows Kamala’s Path To Victory
« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2024, 07:34:34 pm »
Don't do this, Maine.

And Nebraska shouldn't have done it, either.

Reason why:
Since the concept of The Electoral College is a favorite of those of the right, why not take it even further?

That is, end the present system of "winner takes all" (of the Electoral votes).
Instead, make the "Maine system" national, awarding votes by each individual Congressional district. Give the two extra votes (for Senators) to whomever wins the most Electoral votes in the respective state.

If there's a tie of Electors, split the additional votes (for Senators), one each.

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,432
Re: Huge Development In Maine Narrows Kamala’s Path To Victory
« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2024, 07:37:56 pm »
The admission was made by Democratic House Majority Leader Maureen Terry who on Friday told The Bulwark that it’s “very likely” her party missed the window

With Democrats, there is no such thing as 'missing the window'.  The Dems could wait until two weeks after the election to declare that all Maine electoral votes go to the statewide winner, and they would get away with it. 
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Online Weird Tolkienish Figure

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,010
Re: Huge Development In Maine Narrows Kamala’s Path To Victory
« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2024, 07:41:21 pm »
Don't do this, Maine.

And Nebraska shouldn't have done it, either.

Reason why:
Since the concept of The Electoral College is a favorite of those of the right, why not take it even further?

That is, end the present system of "winner takes all" (of the Electoral votes).
Instead, make the "Maine system" national, awarding votes by each individual Congressional district. Give the two extra votes (for Senators) to whomever wins the most Electoral votes in the respective state.

If there's a tie of Electors, split the additional votes (for Senators), one each.

Agreed. But I'd also say leave it up to voters with a referendum to make the change.