Author Topic: Harris embraces Supreme Court term limits that could retire Thomas by 2025  (Read 482 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 401,860
Harris embraces Supreme Court term limits that could retire Thomas by 2025
By
Kaelan Deese
September 9, 2024 2:05 pm
.

The Harris-Walz campaign at last posted policy positions on its website Monday, proposing a plan that would possibly result in the forced retirement of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas by next year, along with two more Republican-appointed justices before the next decade.

Released a day before Vice President Kamala Harris heads to the debate stage against former President Donald Trump, the policy outline includes so-called commonsense Supreme Court reforms such as “imposing term limits.” It’s unclear how long Harris believes a justice should remain on the high court before he or she would be automatically forced into retirement, and her campaign dedicated more attention and detail on its website toward attacking Trump for the three justices he nominated during his single term in office.

“Donald Trump handpicked members of the United States Supreme Court to take away reproductive freedom — and now he brags about it,” the campaign wrote, according to a section on her website under “Restore And Protect Reproductive Freedoms.”

However, Harris’s campaign has reportedly indicated her position is “aligned” with a more detailed plan to replace at least three Republican-appointed justices by 2029, according to a statement from her ally Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) to the Dispatch last month.

more
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/supreme-court/3147313/harris-supreme-court-term-limits-retire-thomas-2025/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 61,110
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Re: Harris embraces Supreme Court term limits that could retire Thomas by 2025
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2024, 06:33:16 pm »
After RBG stuck it out?
No, just no.
Thomas is one of the best jurists on the court in a long time.

This is just an attack by a rogue executive branch on the SCOTUS because they have ruled against their unconstitutional nonsense.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis

Online berdie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,843
Re: Harris embraces Supreme Court term limits that could retire Thomas by 2025
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2024, 06:38:42 pm »
After RBG stuck it out?
No, just no.
Thomas is one of the best jurists on the court in a long time.

This is just an attack by a rogue executive branch on the SCOTUS because they have ruled against their unconstitutional nonsense.



Good point about RBJ.

So if they decide on term limits for the Supremes...I assume the would decide on term limits for Congress? It's only fair and right.

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,466
Re: Harris embraces Supreme Court term limits that could retire Thomas by 2025
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2024, 07:35:25 pm »
The Harris-Walz campaign at last posted policy positions on its website Monday, proposing a plan that would possibly result in the forced retirement of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas by next year, along with two more Republican-appointed justices before the next decade.

Uh, no.  There is no plan proposed on their website.  No explanation whatsoever on how they plan to achieve this.  Nothing.  Zip.  Nada.  Just a wish list with zero substance.

Here is the totality of her 'proposed plan' [sic] posted on her website:

Ensure No One Is Above the Law
Vice President Harris believes that no one is above the law. She’ll fight to ensure that no former president has immunity for crimes committed while in the White House. She will also support common-sense Supreme Court reforms—like requiring Justices to comply with ethics rules that other federal judges are bound by and imposing term limits—to address the crisis of confidence facing the Supreme Court.


https://kamalaharris.com/issues/

I am very interested in hearing how she plans to go about this.  Or more specifically, how one swearing an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution will openly defy the Constitutional protections and powers of the Judiciary Branch.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,466
Re: Harris embraces Supreme Court term limits that could retire Thomas by 2025
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2024, 07:36:18 pm »
Thomas is one of the best jurists on the court in a long time.

He should have been Chief Justice.  Don't know what the hell GWB was thinking.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-