Author Topic: A tale of two errors  (Read 314 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 176,970
A tale of two errors
« on: September 08, 2024, 06:55:14 am »
A tale of two errors
Director's column
2 Sep 2024
Written By Andrew Montford

Last year, the Royal Society published a paper on the production cost of electricity in a decarbonised grid, and we at Net Zero Watch responded with a critique – of its use of highly optimistic assumptions about technological improvements, and thus costs and efficiencies, and of its failure to show policymakers the much higher costs that would arise with currently available technology.

Over the last few months, there have been a few developments. In particular, two errors have been identified – one in the NZW paper, and one in the Royal Society’s paper.

My error was as follows. I had noticed that the Royal Society had used an inappropriate seasonal demand curve in their study, and had suggested that this made a material difference to the results. However, it turned out that there was an error in my spreadsheet, and in fact the difference is immaterial. I have amended the report, although I should note that my main findings are unaffected.

https://www.netzerowatch.com/all-news/tale-of-two-errors
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address