Understanding The Seven Major Errors In Climate Models

[rangerrebew]

Understanding The Seven Major Errors In Climate Models
by Roy Clark, guest post  Aug 22, 2024 

There are at least seven major mistakes found in climate models. Five of them come from oversimplified ideas about how energy moves. Another one involves errors that build up when solving complex equations about how air and water behave.

The last mistake is assuming that the global average temperature is a good measure of climate change.


I detail these errors in my paper “A Nobel Prize for Climate Modeling Errors”, Science of Climate Change 4(1) pp. 1-73 (2024). References to specific sections of this paper, identified as C24, are provided in the discussion.

The first three errors in simplifying energy transfer come from the 1967 paper by Manabe and Wetherald, titled “Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a given distribution of relative humidity” [MW67].

https://climatechangedispatch.com/understanding-the-seven-major-errors-in-climate-models/

[catfish1957]

I could add 8 through 12, but will leave you with the biggest flaw in the data and models that these duped climatologist will not respond or a address.

NOAA/NWS reporting stations were mostly built in the country and burbs back in the 1940's and 1950's.  A vast majority of these have seen urban creep which significantly skews reporting temperatures towards the hot side.  Realize that these computer models are specs on a grid, and if the possibly 1/2 square mile reflected in these temperatures actually represents and extrapolated to 100's of square miles......   i hope you get the picture that what is reporting in 1960 will not reflect the same in 2020. 

And that is just one many dirty little secrets that the scam Greenie Weenie academic sell outs are peddling.

[The_Reader_David]

I could add 8 through 12, but will leave you with the biggest flaw in the data and models that these duped climatologist will not respond or a address.

NOAA/NWS reporting stations were mostly built in the country and burbs back in the 1940's and 1950's.  A vast majority of these have seen urban creep which significantly skews reporting temperatures towards the hot side.  Realize that these computer models are specs on a grid, and if the possibly 1/2 square mile reflected in these temperatures actually represents and extrapolated to 100's of square miles......   i hope you get the picture that what is reporting in 1960 will not reflect the same in 2020. 

And that is just one many dirty little secrets that the scam Greenie Weenie academic sell outs are peddling.

It's actually even worse than that:  the "modellers" deliberately prefer urban climate stations to rural and have been found applying "corrections" in the opposite direction from what would correct for increased urban heat-island effect.  (That last was with Australian data, but I have little doubt they do the same with US data.)

[DefiantMassRINO]

Accoring to their past model runs, should all life on Earth be dead already?

I thought the planet had a fever, and Al Gore was the Tylenol.