Megyn Kelly says it's 'fair game' to question Kamala Harris' past relationship with ex-San Fran Mayo

[mystery-ak]

Megyn Kelly says it's 'fair game' to question Kamala Harris' past relationship with ex-San Fran Mayor Willie Brown: 'That affair is sus'
Ariel Zilber

Megyn Kelly says it's 'fair game' to question Kamala Harris' past relationship with Willie Brown

Vice President Kamala Harris’ past relationship with ex-San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown is “fair game” for media scrutiny now that the former is the overwhelming favorite to be the Democratic Party’s nominee for president, according to Megyn Kelly.

“I’m going there,” Kelly said on her SiriusXM podcast “The Megyn Kelly Show” on Monday, noting that there was a “debate on Twitter … on whether Willie Brown” boosted her career during their brief romance decades ago.

“First she slept with this guy Willie Brown who was this extremely popular, powerful Congressman out in California … and he put her in two different positions that she did not deserve when she was only 29 or 30 [and] he was 60,” according to Kelly.

more
https://nypost.com/2024/07/23/media/megyn-kelly-says-kamala-harris-relationship-with-willie-brown-fair-game/

[rustynail]

Why didn't Kamala hook up with a powerful female politician?   Is she homophobic?

[collins]

yeah, she could have done Hillary but they were in different states.

better hurry interviewing Willie, he is ninety years old now. He sure is sour on her.

[Sighlass]

I guess it is fair, but Trump has no high ground himself to stand on with his multiple affairs (unless you hold male politicians can do that). IOWs, don't be a hypocrite, use the same measuring stick and if you give one a pass, then it is hypocritical not to give the other.

Ouch huh... that is just another reason Trump made a horrible candidate.

[collins]

who the hell said anything about Trump? Did he have an affair with a married woman three times his age to advance himself politically?

ouch, huh?

[mystery-ak]

Post
Conversation
Matt Walsh
@MattWalshBlog
Some on the Right are worried that going after Kamala for sleeping her way to the top will backfire and make us look mean. This is where it’s important to understand that not everyone on the Right can or should be taking the same approach. I agree that Trump shouldn’t say that about her. But it is a part of her story that should be known. It makes her seem like a mediocre, disgraceful, conniving woman, which she is. So let people like me get that message out. We’re already the mean ones. We can take that hit. It filters out from us and makes its way into the public consciousness. Trump never has to say a word about it, and shouldn’t.

[Smokin Joe]

Post
Conversation
Matt Walsh
@MattWalshBlog
Some on the Right are worried that going after Kamala for sleeping her way to the top will backfire and make us look mean. This is where it’s important to understand that not everyone on the Right can or should be taking the same approach. I agree that Trump shouldn’t say that about her. But it is a part of her story that should be known. It makes her seem like a mediocre, disgraceful, conniving woman, which she is. So let people like me get that message out. We’re already the mean ones. We can take that hit. It filters out from us and makes its way into the public consciousness. Trump never has to say a word about it, and shouldn’t.

Mean?
How about those who were qualified for the job but didn't blow the interview?

Their dedication just couldn't stand up to the hard work she put in. 

[MeganC]

I guess it is fair, but Trump has no high ground himself to stand on with his multiple affairs (unless you hold male politicians can do that). IOWs, don't be a hypocrite, use the same measuring stick and if you give one a pass, then it is hypocritical not to give the other.

Ouch huh... that is just another reason Trump made a horrible candidate.

If you want a President who sounds like and postures like a 'statesman' then John Kerry is your man.

But right now this country is in crisis and we don't need another limp-dick RINO to mis-lead the country. We need a rough, street fighting bastard who can take a bullet and get back on his feet and FIGHT!!!!

And President Donald J. Trump, like him or not, is the best street fighting bastard we've got.

And he has earned my vote.

So you go vote for some metrosexual fa66ot if that makes you happy. Myself, I want an actual America-loving man in charge. 

[cato potatoe]

If you want a President who sounds like and postures like a 'statesman' then John Kerry is your man.

Well, it seems like most voters expect their president to be statesmanlike at times, and aggressive at others.  Trump has no problem with the second, but when has he turned on the statesman?  That is his problem.  Unless he cobbles together 270 EVs, all of that aggression gets wasted.

[libertybele]

If you want a President who sounds like and postures like a 'statesman' then John Kerry is your man.

But right now this country is in crisis and we don't need another limp-dick RINO to mis-lead the country. We need a rough, street fighting bastard who can take a bullet and get back on his feet and FIGHT!!!!

And President Donald J. Trump, like him or not, is the best street fighting bastard we've got.

And he has earned my vote.

So you go vote for some metrosexual fa66ot if that makes you happy. Myself, I want an actual America-loving man in charge. 

The coin has flipped.  Harris is a female of color and anything said against her, she'll play the race card, guarantee it. Trump had the Black vote in his pocket and now her being the VP changes all that (yes I realize she's not African-American).

Why Trump didn't foresee that she'd possibly play a bigger role at the Convention, I'm not sure.  Going after Joe was easy -- unfortunately it appears that Harris may be the nominee. She's already slamming Trump...funny...she's miraculously lost her chuckling and her word salad as she speaks out against him.

I've said this numerous times now -- JD was a big mistake and I think he's going to sink Trump's re-election.  Trump needed to pick either someone Black or a female.  He selected a 'newbie' with little experience who doesn't bring a whole lot to the ticket.

[LMAO]

I guess it is fair, but Trump has no high ground himself to stand on with his multiple affairs (unless you hold male politicians can do that). IOWs, don't be a hypocrite, use the same measuring stick and if you give one a pass, then it is hypocritical not to give the other.

Ouch huh... that is just another reason Trump made a horrible candidate.

You hit the nail on the head, judging by the reaction you got.

But despite the lashing out to your post, it would be very hypocritical for the Trump campaign the point out Kamala “moral failings” and vice versa

[LMAO]

Well, it seems like most voters expect their president to be statesmanlike at times, and aggressive at others.  Trump has no problem with the second, but when has he turned on the statesman?  That is his problem.  Unless he cobbles together 270 EVs, all of that aggression gets wasted.

Trump has been surprisingly a little bit more subdued this election cycle than he was  2016 or 2020


Harris is very vulnerable on the border especially because she was supposed to be the “Border Czar” and failed spectacularly at that

That’s where the line of attack should be.

[libertybele]

Trump has been surprisingly a little bit more subdued this election cycle than he was  2016 or 2020


Harris is very vulnerable on the border especially because she was supposed to be the “Border Czar” and failed spectacularly at that

That’s where the line of attack should be.

Should be, but it won't be.  She's going to play the race card AND she'll now bring up that there is no crisis at the border, she had things under control and that she intends to grant amnesty.  In doing so she will try to capture the female, Black and Hispanic votes. 

[LMAO]

Should be, but it won't be.  She's going to play the race card AND she'll now bring up that there is no crisis at the border, she had things under control and that she intends to grant amnesty.  In doing so she will try to capture the female, Black and Hispanic votes.

She won’t call it amnesty on the campaign trail

It’ll be called “comprehensive immigration reform”

[MeganC]

You hit the nail on the head, judging by the reaction you got.

But despite the lashing out to your post, it would be very hypocritical for the Trump campaign the point out Kamala “moral failings” and vice versa

If I were Trump I'd deal with Kamala and the people who'd bleat about hypocrisy in a very few words.

"I used to know women like Harris. They're good for a tumble but you'd never consider marrying one of them!"

[collins]

everyone has "moral failings" in some form but Kamala's is sleeping with a much older, powerful married man on her way to the top. Not a feminist concept at all.

[MeganC]

everyone has "moral failings" in some form but Kamala's is sleeping with a much older, powerful married man on her way to the top. Not a feminist concept at all.

 

[Cyber Liberty]

Well, it seems like most voters expect their president to be statesmanlike at times, and aggressive at others.  Trump has no problem with the second, but when has he turned on the statesman?  That is his problem.  Unless he cobbles together 270 EVs, all of that aggression gets wasted.

Walking into North Korea and shaking Kim Jung Un's hand comes to mind...just for one.

[Fishrrman]

If you want to go after kamala with real ammunition, don't bother so much with Willie Brown.

Go after her for not being qualified to serve as president because she is not a natural-born citizen.

Start making noise about this, and DON'T STOP if the enemedia tries to shoot you down. Just TURN UP the volume and pressure.

[mystery-ak]

Well Kammie opened the door today by implying Trump was a rapist and a convicted felon...but Trumo should use a surrogate to do the dirty work..Vivek would be good at this.

[DefiantMassRINO]

Did Kamala Harris falsify business records to pay hush money to a person, who was not her spouse, to keep the adulterous affair out of the headlines before the 2016 Presidential Election?

Stick with the issues - inflation, illegal immigration, war against American energy, Green New Deal mandates.

[mountaineer]

  Trump has no problem with the second, but when has he turned on the statesman? 

When he got Middle Eastern countries to enter into the Abraham Accord? When he got the bellicose little Rocket Man to back off? He's not the top hat and waistcoat kind of "statesman" of old, but he got things done.

[berdie]

As much as I want this to be about the issues...it won't be.

So if Kammie starts the "felon" fight...Trump could very well use the same methods he has used in the past (not that I like them) and expose her past. A direct attack would be a mistake on his part. Heck, he even did a lot of lying in the past to take down an opponent.

Anyone who says Trump isn't a politician hasn't watched him. At least use it against a Dem this time...instead of a conservative.

[mountaineer]

Allie Beth Stuckey
@conservmillen
Kamala Harris might deserve name calling but doing so will only garner her sympathy
11:28 AM · Jul 25, 2024


Allie Beth Stuckey
@conservmillen
Stop attacking Kamala from the left. “She put too many people in jail” “She called Gen Z-ers stupid!” Umm these are actually the best things about her and no one who matters is going to be swayed this way
11:30 AM · Jul 25, 2024

[mountaineer]

The Media Won’t Tell You Political Corruption Defined Kamala Harris’ Affair With Willie Brown
The New York Times says it’s ‘sexist’ to question why Harris had an affair with a powerful political boss twice her age — but the facts they’re not telling you are damning.
By: Mark Hemingway
July 26, 2024

Kamala Harris hasn’t been the presumptive Democrat nominee for even a week, and already the press is desperately trying to insist perfectly valid criticisms of her are illegitimate. If you think the media were complicit in attempting and failing to hide Joe Biden’s senility, the attempt to retcon her political career into something that resembles respectable and competent is even more brazen.

“She was never the border czar.”

“She was never considered the most liberal senator.”

“She was never a DEI hire.”

“She doesn’t owe her political career to her powerful boyfriend.”

Oh, but she was, she was, she was, and she does.

The dishonesty surrounding all of these issues is worth highlighting, but let’s focus on that last point involving Harris’ relationship with California’s powerful political boss Wille Brown, for no other reason than The New York Times has provided a terrific example of how the lies are coming in hot. ...

https://thefederalist.com/2024/07/26/the-media-wont-tell-you-political-corruption-defined-kamala-harris-affair-with-willie-brown/