Google Doesn’t Want You To Know The Truth About Heat Waves And ‘Climate Change’

[rangerrebew]

Google Doesn’t Want You To Know The Truth About Heat Waves And ‘Climate Change’
Heartland Author
Heartland Author
July 1, 2024
 

By Issues & Insights Editorial Board
Ast week, we published an editorial arguing that government data didn’t support various claims about climate change. And we predicted Google would demonetize it. We were right. (See: Heat Wave Sets Off New Round Of ‘Climate Crisis’ Lies.)

Shortly after that article was published, Google’s AdSense informed us that it had “disabled ad serving” on that page because the article contained “unreliable and harmful claims.” (We have one spot on our pages for AdSense ads, mostly to track Google’s efforts to demonetize content. See the list of related editorials below.)



So what was “unreliable” or “harmful” about that editorial? Google doesn’t say. It just says we have to “fix” it if we want their ads to run on that page.

What we can say is that Google has effectively labeled official government data as “unreliable and harmful,” since all the evidence we provided was from official sources.

https://heartlanddailynews.com/2024/07/google-doesnt-want-you-to-know-the-truth-about-heat-waves-and-climate-change/

[Smokin Joe]

Yep. Not surprised. A social Media Platform (Facebook) branded as "misinformation" two article links to peer reviewed medical journal articles (posted the links without comment) in the NIH library in less time than it would take a fast human to click on the links, much less read the content of the papers linked. With further development of AI, I expect the problem to get worse, not better.
Narratives will be protected. Dissenters will be banned, either directly or by being shoved off into some corner and obscurity.

Remember, Google, in order to keep running in China, developed filters to hide content and find dissidents.

Totalitarians gotta do their thing, and for those who worship money (and power) playing along comes naturally. The view of 'Socialism' from the top down is far different than the view from the bottom up.