Author Topic: Justices claim immunity ruling allows presidents to poison staff, have Navy SEALs kill political riv  (Read 1131 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 401,698
Justices claim immunity ruling allows presidents to poison staff, have Navy SEALs kill political rivals
Chief Justice John Roberts chided the liberal justices for 'fear mongering'
By Brianna Herlihy Fox News
Published July 1, 2024 5:45pm EDT

In their dissents from the Supreme Court's decision on presidential immunity, the court's liberal justices suggested that the majority opinion allows for a slew of alarming scenarios — including a president ordering a Navy SEAL team to "assassinate" his political rival or even poisoning one of his own cabinet members.

The high court on Monday ruled 6-3 that a president has substantial immunity for official acts that occurred during his time in office. It's a decision that has significant implications for former President Trump, whose prosecution on charges related to the Jan. 6 U.S. Capitol breach and alleged 2020 election interference spurred the Supreme Court to hear the case.

But although the majority opinion from Chief Justice John Roberts explicitly stated that the president "is not above the law" and immunity is only a factor when it involves an "official act" — the justices sent the case back to lower courts to determine if the acts at the center of Trump's case were "official" — the ruling raised a series of frightening possibilities, according to the trio of dissenting justices.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan wrote in the primary dissent that the court's majority opinion "makes a mockery of the principle, foundational to our Constitution and system of Government, that no man is above the law."

more
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/justices-claim-immunity-ruling-allows-presidents-poison-staffers-have-navy-seals-kill-political-rivals
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline PeteS in CA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,534
Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan lied, openly crudely, in their published dissent, for partisan purposes. That should be impeachable, IMO.
I am not and never have been a leftist.

If, as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2021/robert-f-kennedy-jr-said-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-the-deadliest-vaccine-ever-made-thats-not-true/ , https://gospelnewsnetwork.org/2021/11/23/covid-shots-are-the-deadliest-vaccines-in-medical-history/ , The Vaccine is deadly, where in the US have Pfizer and Moderna hidden the millions of bodies of those who died of "vaccine injury"?

Millions now living should have died. Anti-Covid-Vaxxer ghouls hardest hit.

Online Weird Tolkienish Figure

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,991
Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan lied, openly crudely, in their published dissent, for partisan purposes. That should be impeachable, IMO.

It is impeachable AFAIK. Look up Samuel Chase.

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 48,301
Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan lied, openly crudely, in their published dissent, for partisan purposes. That should be impeachable, IMO.

They should be impeached.

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,263
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
Cynical Publius
@CynicalPublius
I'm not sure I have ever seen a bigger disconnect between objective reality and Democrat madness than the fallout of the SCOTUS decision on Presidential immunity.

REALITY: SCOTUS affirmed longstanding law and practice.  The Prez has immunity to do certain things that are solely inside his powers, he/she has a rebuttable presumption of immunity for other things in the scope of his/her powers, and for other stuff there is no immunity. This is nothing new and makes perfect sense under the Constitution.

DEMOCRATS: SCOTUS said Trump is allowed to nuke California.

I seriously think this is the very most disconnected from the rational world that I have ever seen these nutjob Fascist Democrats get.  It's actually kind of scary.

https://x.com/CynicalPublius/status/1808257466121027989
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 48,301
Cynical Publius
@CynicalPublius
I'm not sure I have ever seen a bigger disconnect between objective reality and Democrat madness than the fallout of the SCOTUS decision on Presidential immunity.

REALITY: SCOTUS affirmed longstanding law and practice.  The Prez has immunity to do certain things that are solely inside his powers, he/she has a rebuttable presumption of immunity for other things in the scope of his/her powers, and for other stuff there is no immunity. This is nothing new and makes perfect sense under the Constitution.

DEMOCRATS: SCOTUS said Trump is allowed to nuke California.

I seriously think this is the very most disconnected from the rational world that I have ever seen these nutjob Fascist Democrats get.  It's actually kind of scary.

https://x.com/CynicalPublius/status/1808257466121027989


:thumbsup:

Offline roamer_1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,496
the check and balance not mentioned here is the shadow of a congressional impeachment and conviction.
It is the duty of Congress (and Congress alone) to police the official actions of a president.