Author Topic: Raskin argues DOJ can force recusals of Alito, Thomas in Jan. 6 cases  (Read 2254 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 401,692
 Raskin argues DOJ can force recusals of Alito, Thomas in Jan. 6 cases
by Tara Suter - 05/29/24 9:00 PM ET

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) argued that the Department of Justice (DOJ) could force the recusals of Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito in cases it is facing related to the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol attack.

“Everyone assumes that nothing can be done about the recusal situation because the highest court in the land has the lowest ethical standards — no binding ethics code or process outside of personal reflection,” the Maryland Democrat said in an opinion piece in The New York Times published Wednesday. “Each justice decides for him- or herself whether he or she can be impartial.”

Raskin then noted that Alito and Thomas “could choose to recuse themselves,” but that “begging them to do the right thing misses a far more effective course of action.”

“The U.S. Department of Justice — including the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, an appointed U.S. special counsel and the solicitor general, all of whom were involved in different ways in the criminal prosecutions underlying these cases and are opposing Mr. Trump’s constitutional and statutory claims — can petition the other seven justices to require Justices Alito and Thomas to recuse themselves not as a matter of grace but as a matter of law,” Raskin continued.

Alito and Thomas have faced recent calls to recuse themselves from cases related to the Jan. 6 attack due to controversies over flags reportedly flown at Alito’s houses linked to the “Stop the Steal” effort and Thomas’ wife’s reported involvement in that same effort.

more
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4692965-raskin-argues-doj-can-force-recusals-of-alito-thomas-in-jan-6-cases/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline PeteS in CA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,534
Did he cite the relevant Article and Section that gives the Executive branch authority to force such a recusal?
I am not and never have been a leftist.

If, as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2021/robert-f-kennedy-jr-said-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-the-deadliest-vaccine-ever-made-thats-not-true/ , https://gospelnewsnetwork.org/2021/11/23/covid-shots-are-the-deadliest-vaccines-in-medical-history/ , The Vaccine is deadly, where in the US have Pfizer and Moderna hidden the millions of bodies of those who died of "vaccine injury"?

Millions now living should have died. Anti-Covid-Vaxxer ghouls hardest hit.

Online Wingnut

  • The problem with everything is they try and make it better without realizing the old way is fine.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,241
  • Gender: Male
I'm not a constitutional scholar, but I think Raskin is pulling that theory out of his ass.
You don’t become cooler with age but you do care progressively less about being cool, which is the only true way to actually be cool.

Online catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,272
  • Gender: Male
Seems the left wing dims are getting frisky with lawfare.  Something has to be done about it, at some point,
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,259
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
I'm not a constitutional scholar, but I think Raskin is pulling that theory out of his ass.

Think??? I know damned well he is!
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 48,301
The Constitution is quite clear:  there is one, and only one, remedy for a misbehaving Supreme Court justice:  impeachment. 

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,385
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) argued that the Department of Justice (DOJ) could force the recusals of Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito in cases it is facing related to the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol attack.

Straight up fascist.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,385
Did he cite the relevant Article and Section that gives the Executive branch authority to force such a recusal?

A liberal cite something from the Constitution?   HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 62,025
Moronic legal take from a moron.
The abnormal is not the normal just because it is prevalent.
Roger Kimball, in a talk at Hillsdale College, 1/29/25

Offline Timber Rattler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,744
  • Conservative Purist and Patriot
I guess Raskin didn't get John Robert's blunt message to Durbin and Whitehouse today.  DOJ has no power to do anything to a SCOTUS justice, which is a co-equal branch of government.
aka "nasty degenerate SOB," "worst of the worst at Free Republic," "Garbage Troll," "Neocon Warmonger," "Filthy Piece of Trash," "damn $#%$#@!," "Silly f'er," "POS," "war pig," "neocon scumbag," "insignificant little ankle nipper," "@ss-clown," "neocuck," "termite," "Uniparty Deep stater," "Never Trump sack of dog feces," "avid Bidenista," "filthy Ukrainian," "war whore," "fricking chump," "psychopathic POS," "depraved SOB," "Never Trump Moron," "Lazarus," and "sock puppet."

"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."  ---George Orwell

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,259
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
I guess Raskin didn't get John Robert's blunt message to Durbin and Whitehouse today.  DOJ has no power to do anything to a SCOTUS justice, which is a co-equal branch of government.

Do you think Durbin, Whitehouse, or any other Democrat you might name, GAF what the Constitution says about anything?
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline LMAO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,762
  • Gender: Male
The Constitution is quite clear: 

He  won't  let something trivial like the Constitution get in his way
I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them.

Barry Goldwater

http://www.usdebtclock.org

My Avatar is my adult autistic son Tommy

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,385
Do you think Durbin, Whitehouse, or any other Democrat you might name, GAF what the Constitution says about anything?

To be fair, Whitehouse isn't a Democrat.  He's a hardline Communist.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,259
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
To be fair, Whitehouse isn't a Democrat.  He's a hardline Communist.

:yowsa: I stand corrected.
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline Weird Tolkienish Figure

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,990
How exactly does someone force a recusal?  It's against the very definition of the word.  They could I guess torture Alito or somehow compel him to give a recusal I guess.

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,385
How exactly does someone force a recusal?  It's against the very definition of the word.

You clearly don't understand how fascism works.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 62,025
Do you think Durbin, Whitehouse, or any other Democrat you might name, GAF what the Constitution says about anything?
As evidenced by their ersatz president, who brags about violating SCOTUS rulings ... no.
The abnormal is not the normal just because it is prevalent.
Roger Kimball, in a talk at Hillsdale College, 1/29/25

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 48,301
He  won't  let something trivial like the Constitution get in his way

Yes, I know.  I'm just a stick-in-the-mud when it comes to the Constitution.