Author Topic: Marine Corps Stand-In Forces: A House of Cards  (Read 292 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 177,020
Marine Corps Stand-In Forces: A House of Cards
« on: May 28, 2024, 11:47:15 am »
Marine Corps Stand-In Forces: A House of Cards
By Anthony Zinni & Jerry McAbee
May 28, 2024
U.S. Marine Corps

How did the United States Marine Corps transform itself from the world’s premier expeditionary force-in-readiness to a poor parody of the French Maginot Line in just four years? In his Force Design 2030 plan, the 38th Commandant of the Marine Corps radically redesigned and restructured the Marine Corps to operate as a defensively oriented, narrowly specialized regional force under Navy command to attack and sink Chinese warships in the South China Sea. This new mission came at the expense of providing much needed crisis response and global force projection capabilities to all Geographic Combatant and Functional Commands in an increasingly unstable world. The crown jewel of this new warfighting organization are called Stand-in Forces (SIFs), which are small isolated detachments of Marines, armed with anti-ship missiles, persistently spread across islands in the so-called “contested” areas of hostilities: specifically the first island chain.   

To fund these largely experimental units, the Marine Corps divested proven capabilities needed to fight and win today anywhere in the world, an unwise and unproven approach termed “divest to invest.” The Corps jettisoned all its tanks and bridging, most of its cannon artillery and assault breaching, and much of its infantry and new, state-of-the art aviation at a time when these certain capabilities are showing to be critical in ongoing conflicts.


In an act that can only be described as negligence, the Commandant reduced the Corps’ long-standing requirement for 38 amphibious ships to 31 and stood silent as the Navy decimated the Maritime Prepositioning Squadrons (MPS) by reducing their numbers from 3 to 2 and the total number of ships from 17 to 7.  The loss of MPS ships together with the reduction in the number of major amphibious assault ships – and their poor state of maintenance and availability – make it doubtful that the Marine Corps has the capability to project even a limited Marine Expeditionary Force in time to influence events before or after hostilities commence.

https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2024/05/28/marine_corps_stand-in_forces_a_house_of_cards_1034266.html
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address

Offline DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,296
  • Gender: Male
Re: Marine Corps Stand-In Forces: A House of Cards
« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2024, 11:55:30 am »
Isn't it the Navy's job to sink enemy ships?

Stationary installations are most probably going to be pre-emptively attacked at the beginning of hostilities.  Think Japanese attacks on US Pacific installations in 1941/1942.
"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it’s entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." - Alan Simpson, Frontline Video Interview