Author Topic: Maine judge defers decision on Trump ballot question until Supreme Court rules  (Read 424 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 402,071

Maine judge defers decision on Trump ballot question until Supreme Court rules

By Marshall Cohen, CNN

Updated: 3:26 PM EST, Wed January 17, 2024

Source: CNN

A Maine judge on Wednesday told state election officials to wait for the US Supreme Court to rule on Donald Trump’s eligibility for the 2024 presidential ballot.

Trump asked the judge to overturn a prior decision that removed him from the Maine ballot, but the judge declined to do that, pausing the proceedings until the Supreme Court weighs in. Practically speaking, Wednesday’s decision means that Trump’s name is still on the ballot for the Maine GOP primary on March 5, which is Super Tuesday.

The Supreme Court plans to hear oral arguments in a similar case from Colorado early next month. Maine and Colorado are so far the only states to disqualify Trump based on his role in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

Under Maine law, ballot challenges are first handled by the secretary of state, and then can be appealed in state courts. A group of voters filed a challenge in December and Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows ruled that Trump was ineligible for office.

more
https://lite.cnn.com/2024/01/17/politics/maine-14th-amendment-trump/index.html
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline libertybele

  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 64,998
  • Gender: Female
...and so Trump is NOT out of the woods by any means of not being on the ballot in all 50 states. I'm not so confident that SCOTUS will rule in Trump's favor. 

Offline LMAO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,770
  • Gender: Male
I'm not so confident that SCOTUS will rule in Trump's favor.

I am

I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them.

Barry Goldwater

http://www.usdebtclock.org

My Avatar is my adult autistic son Tommy

Offline Maj. Bill Martin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,077
  • Gender: Male
  • I'll make Mincemeat out of 'em"

Online Timber Rattler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,795
  • Conservative Purist and Patriot
I am

Yeah, me too.  If SCOTUS rules against Trump on an issue such as this, then the country's entire presidential election system would melt down into total chaos.
aka "nasty degenerate SOB," "worst of the worst at Free Republic," "Garbage Troll," "Neocon Warmonger," "Filthy Piece of Trash," "damn $#%$#@!," "Silly f'er," "POS," "war pig," "neocon scumbag," "insignificant little ankle nipper," "@ss-clown," "neocuck," "termite," "Uniparty Deep stater," "Never Trump sack of dog feces," "avid Bidenista," "filthy Ukrainian," "war whore," "fricking chump," "psychopathic POS," "depraved SOB," "Never Trump Moron," "Lazarus," and "sock puppet."

"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."  ---George Orwell

Offline LMAO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,770
  • Gender: Male
Yeah, me too.  If SCOTUS rules against Trump on an issue such as this, then the country's entire presidential election system would melt down into total chaos.

It would also set a bad precedent for the future

A party could use it to at least weaken their opposition

I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them.

Barry Goldwater

http://www.usdebtclock.org

My Avatar is my adult autistic son Tommy

Offline Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,657
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
Yeah, me too.  If SCOTUS rules against Trump on an issue such as this, then the country's entire presidential election system would melt down into total chaos.

You literally would be able to accuse anyone of anything without a trial or even proof and get them off the ballot.

If they want a national divorce or civil war, then let this slide.
The Republic is lost.