Author Topic: World Economic Forum claims $3.5 trillion is needed annually to “decarbonize” our planet… code word  (Read 514 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 176,727
World Economic Forum claims $3.5 trillion is needed annually to “decarbonize” our planet… code word for DEPOPULATION
12/22/2023 / By Cassie B.


The World Economic Forum is now claiming that it needs trillions of dollars each year to “decarbonize” the planet and reach its extreme goals for the environment.

This is according to a white paper that they published on Wednesday in partnership with McKinsey & Company entitled “The Role of Public-Private-Philanthropic Partnerships in Driving Climate and Nature Transitions.”

The report’s highlights section notes: “The world needs up to $3.5 trillion of additional investments each year to reach net-zero and restore nature.”

They are also calling for a “system-level transformation” to meet climate goals, which entails four main parties. The public sector, they say, can implement policies, regulations and incentives and invest money in solutions that support the WEF’s self-serving plans. They go on to say that the private sector, which includes corporations that attract investor support, can set up business models and mobilize resources to deploy “solutions” at scale.

https://www.climate.news/2023-12-22-world-economic-forum-trillions-annually-decarbonize-planet.html
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,334
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum

Offline GtHawk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,528
  • Gender: Male
  • Well EXCUSE me!
It would be way cheaper, more environmentally friendly and ever so more satisfying to simply "carbonize" the WEF