Author Topic: 1500 Prisoners Released in California with NO Supervision, 450 “Very Dangerous”  (Read 3079 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 47,124
  • Gender: Male
http://www.uncoverage.net/2011/05/1500-prisoners-released-in-california-with-no-supervision-450-very-dangerous/


1500 Prisoners Released in California with NO Supervision, 450 “Very Dangerous”


Posted on May 26, 2011 by Jane Jamison| 1 Comment

California, once again, the poster for the utter failure of progressivism.  Liberals spend billions and years spinning the latest social craze, but they can’t provide the basics of government: Good schools, infrastructure, and public safety.  California is becoming a very dangerous place, thanks to  elected liberals.

California is already reeling under the mandate of this week’s Supreme Court ruling which is ordering the release of at 33,000 to 45,000 inmates due to “inhumane” prison overcrowding.  As we reported this week, Governor Brown is promising the public will be protected, and that most of the prisoners will be housed instead in country prisons. How can he make that promise when the state is running a $26 billion deficit and part of his budget “cuts” involve transferring inmates to local jurisdictions, many of which have overcrowded jails and tight, over-drawn budgets?

Even without turning loose 46,000 prisoners in the state, California has demonstrated over and again that it cannot perform the basic services required by government.

The state of California quickly paid child-kidnap victim Jaycee Dugard a $20 million settlement last year, without a trial. It was shown that local police and parole officials were abysmally negligent in their duties by ignoring that a convicted sex offender was keeping Jaycee in a shack in his backyard for 18 years.

Today, we learn that the state has mistakenly freed hundreds of dangerous felons, thanks to a flawed computer program put together by one of our “esteemed” UC schools.

OC WatchDog:

    “More than 450 violent criminals were placed on unsupervised parole in California thanks to a flawed automatic risk assessment computer program developed by UC Irvine researchers, according to a special report by the state Office of the Inspector General.

    The risk assessment was supposed to help a new state program select parolees to go without supervision after their release from prison. The program was part of a broad California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) effort to  reduce the number of parolees who are returned to prison on technical parole violations, which in turn would reduce prison overcrowding.

    The Inspector General, however, found that over a seven-month period in 2010, the computer program was wrong nearly 24 percent of the time. About 15 percent of the more than 10,000 inmates placed on unsupervised parole from January to July 2010 should not have received that privilege, the report concludes.

    In fact, “Over 450 of these ineligible offenders carry a high risk for violence, and some of these ineligible offenders may have already been discharged from non-revocable (unsupervised) parole after completing 12 months of parole, thereby precluding CDCR from taking action to correct the parolee’s inappropriate placement on non-revocable parole,” the report says.

    The Office of the Inspector General says the error rate is caused by the computer assessment not taking into account information about prior supervised parole violations, and does not consider certain data about juvenile offenses.

    UCI officials said the report is deeply flawed.

    “I am deeply disappointed that this revised version of the report contains many of the same inaccuracies and poorly crafted science as did the earlier version, even though I brought these errors to the attention of your office,” wrote Susan Turner, director of UCI’s Center for Evidence-Based Corrections, in a letter to the Inspector General’s office (which you can read in its entirety here). We get into UCI’s objections in greater detail below.

    INSPECTOR GENERAL SAYS….

    The report found that the primary database the prison system uses to assess inmates contains incomplete data, and that some assessments that should have been scored manually were instead scored by machine.

    The computer assessment program uses a algorithm developed by UCI to produce a risk assessment score. As the report states, “The algorithm searches the electronic criminal history data of each offender for convictions, which are identified as ‘score-able events.’ This data is then fed into a (risk-assessment) calculator. The resulting score for each offender is made available to staff through a … link on (the prison system’s) computer network.”

    The report says about 96 percent of inmates scores can be calculated using the computer system, but the rest must be figured manually, because they include criminal history data from other jurisdictions outside of California.

    UCI SAYS….

    In her letter, Turner said that the Inspector General’s analysis was inaccurate in two major respects.

    “First, investigators essentially compared ‘apples’ to ‘oranges’ in their exercise when they compared their own manual scoring of hard copy rap sheets with the automated CDCR computer algorithm used for the vast majority of offenders under the supervision of CDCR,” she wrote. “The discrepancies identified by OIG were largely caused by OIG staff using ‘old’ scores generated by an out-of-date scoring algorithm to compare with their hand scored calculations.

    “Second, and perhaps more disturbing, the OIG manual coding considered factors that are not programmed into the current automated version of the tool. Based on these ‘extra’ factors, OIG claims that its coding is not only different from, but also more accurate than, the CDCR tool. While OIG’s manual coding is different from CDCR’s automated coding (because OIG’s coding includes additional factors), there is no evidence that OIG’s manual coding is more accurate than CDCR’s automated coding. The additional factors that OIG inserted into its own manual coding have never been tested to verify their accuracy – either by the OIG or by CDCR. The conclusion in the report – that OIG’s manual coding is more accurate than CDCR’s automated coding — is nonsensical because it amounts to claiming accuracy for a procedure which was never tested for accuracy.”

    The Inspector General’s  second finding — that criminal history records typically are incomplete — “is a limitation of which researchers and criminal justice professionals are well aware of,” Turner wrote. “However, ‘rap sheets’ are the standard used by the justice system and there currently exists no alternative, as the report itself notes.”

    And the Inspector General’s third finding – that juvenile data was handled inconsistently – “relates only to the miniscule number of juvenile records (much less than 1 percent) that are contained in the records. I have discussed this issue repeatedly with investigators from OIG. I have explained that the tool counts adult convictions on adult charges in adult courts. If a juvenile has an adult conviction on an adult charge, it is counted. Otherwise, it is not counted. This is a simple and concise rule that is consistent with Penal Code 3000.03. Therefore, OIG’s report is incorrect.”

    The state corrections department continues to refine and test the tool to increase its accuracy and make the most appropriate decisions about offenders, Turner wrote.

    “We agree that this tool, like any tool, can be improved. An evidence-based dialogue that accurately reflects the tool and possible ways it, and its use, might be improved, could benefit the CDCR, our State and our citizens. However, poor methods, suppositions and bad logic masquerading as evidence that this tool is flawed helps no one and only wastes scarce resources,” she wrote.

    California Watch reports that the correction’s departments “top brass” were not pleased with the report, saying it “goes beyond its relevancy; in fact we must also take issue with its facts and central conclusion.””

__________________________________________________________________________________________
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"Journalism is about covering the news.  With a pillow.  Until it stops moving."    - David Burge (Iowahawk)

"It was only a sunny smile, and little it cost in the giving, but like morning light it scattered the night and made the day worth living" F. Scott Fitzgerald

"Hello Darkness, my old Friend...stood up too fast once again! Paul Simon 2024.

Online DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 47,124
  • Gender: Male
I put this into the General Discussion thread because it is a post on another site...and not a new article.

Folks.....once again.   THINK about this.

I've been telling and warning you nice FRiends that a private army was coming.  Obama's personal army.  Made up of hand-picked felons from the California prison system.

That would be the ONLY government force that would have no compunction about shooting and killing private citizens or perceived enemies.  We're talking no-knock warrants...perfectly legal it seems in Indiana at the moment.  

You read the article and it seems like these 'winners' have disappeared into thin-air.  Non revocable parole....no supervision?  

Am I still crazy?  Over-the-top?
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"Journalism is about covering the news.  With a pillow.  Until it stops moving."    - David Burge (Iowahawk)

"It was only a sunny smile, and little it cost in the giving, but like morning light it scattered the night and made the day worth living" F. Scott Fitzgerald

"Hello Darkness, my old Friend...stood up too fast once again! Paul Simon 2024.

Oceander

  • Guest
Just one correction to a sentence in that otherwise spot-on article:

Quote
America California is becoming a very dangerous place, thanks to  elected liberals.

Online DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 47,124
  • Gender: Male
Just one correction to a sentence in that otherwise spot-on article:


Have been thinking lately about what could be the catalyst to bring about anarchy and mortal danger to anybody who happens to be caught unprepared.

The dollar becoming virtually 'worthless' could be the first sign of mayhem to come.  Interest rate hikes will have to be used to revive a flat-lining bond market due to nobody wanting to buy anymore of our debt.

Then simultaneously they will announce that there is indeed alien intelligence and that there is no heaven or hell.

The people around the world that are living lives hand to mouth, day to day will realize that the only thing they need to fear is the government and not a higher authority.

When those people have no food or pocket cash, blood will flow in the streets.

"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"Journalism is about covering the news.  With a pillow.  Until it stops moving."    - David Burge (Iowahawk)

"It was only a sunny smile, and little it cost in the giving, but like morning light it scattered the night and made the day worth living" F. Scott Fitzgerald

"Hello Darkness, my old Friend...stood up too fast once again! Paul Simon 2024.

Oceander

  • Guest
Have been thinking lately about what could be the catalyst to bring about anarchy and mortal danger to anybody who happens to be caught unprepared.

The dollar becoming virtually 'worthless' could be the first sign of mayhem to come.  Interest rate hikes will have to be used to revive a flat-lining bond market due to nobody wanting to buy anymore of our debt.

Then simultaneously they will announce that there is indeed alien intelligence and that there is no heaven or hell.

The people around the world that are living lives hand to mouth, day to day will realize that the only thing they need to fear is the government and not a higher authority.

When those people have no food or pocket cash, blood will flow in the streets.




Enforced austerity due to skyrocketing interest rates and the consequent inability of government to pay for anything other than, perhaps, the core basics like the military, and emptying prisons caused by (a) continuing idiocy from the courts, and (b) an inability to continue paying for the prisoners who remain.

A flood of released criminals and no police or prisons capable of preventing their depredations.  Courtesy of our "friends" the liberals.

Online DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 47,124
  • Gender: Male
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/when-faith-in-u-s-dollars-and-u-s-debt-is-dead-the-game-is-over-and-that-day-is-closer-than-you-may-think


When Faith In U.S. Dollars And U.S. Debt Is Dead The Game Is Over – And That Day Is Closer Than You May Think

A day is coming when the rest of the world will decide that it no longer has faith in U.S. dollars or in U.S. debt.  When that day arrives, the game will be over.  Traditionally, two of the biggest things that the U.S. economy has had going for it were the U.S. dollar and U.S. Treasuries.  The U.S. dollar has been the default reserve currency of the world for decades.  All over the globe it was seen as a strong, stable currency that was desirable for international trade.  U.S. government debt has long been considered the "safest debt" in the entire world.  Whenever there was a major crisis, investors would flock to U.S. Treasuries because they were considered a rock.  Sadly, all of this is now changing.  Today the rest of the world is losing faith in the U.S. financial system.  In fact, even the United Nations is now warning of the collapse of the dollar.  But if the U.S. dollar and U.S. Treasuries collapse, that will be an absolute nightmare for the U.S. economy.  If the rest of the world does not want our dollars someday, then what are we going to give them in exchange for all of the oil and all of the cheap imported goods they send us?  If the rest of the world does not want our debt someday, then how in the world are we going to be able to continue to consume far, far more wealth than we produce?

The rest of the world is watching the U.S. government run up record-setting budget deficits and they are watching the Federal Reserve print money like there is no tomorrow and they realize that the U.S. financial system is slowly imploding.

As mentioned above, now even the United Nations is warning that the U.S. dollar could collapse.  The following is a brief excerpt from a recent news report put out by Reuters....

    The United Nations warned on Wednesday of a possible crisis of confidence in, and even a “collapse” of, the U.S. dollar if its value against other currencies continued to decline.

    In a mid-year review of the world economy, the UN economic division said such a development, stemming from the falling value of foreign dollar holdings, would imperil the global financial system.



excerpted:

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"Journalism is about covering the news.  With a pillow.  Until it stops moving."    - David Burge (Iowahawk)

"It was only a sunny smile, and little it cost in the giving, but like morning light it scattered the night and made the day worth living" F. Scott Fitzgerald

"Hello Darkness, my old Friend...stood up too fast once again! Paul Simon 2024.