Author Topic: NOAA Throws Cold Water On Hysterical Claims Of ‘Hottest Days On Record’  (Read 409 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 176,733
WRITTEN BY NICK POPE ON JUL 10, 2023. POSTED IN LATEST NEWS

NOAA Throws Cold Water On Hysterical Claims Of ‘Hottest Days On Record’

Numerous corporate media outlets drove the narrative that July 3-5 was the hottest 72-hour stretch ever on record, citing a data tool from the University of Maine that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has warned is not as dependable as traditional observational data. [emphasis, links added]


The New York Times, Fortune, Axios, and CBS News each cited the University of Maine’s Climate Reanalyzer in various Thursday reports asserting that this week’s global temperatures broke the previous record for the hottest three-day stretch.

The coverage came as NOAA said Thursday that the Reanalyzer’s data is not a suitable substitute for observational data, since the Reanalyzer depends in part on unverifiable outputs, according to The Associated Press.

Axios’ Thursday headline asserted that “Earth sees three hottest days on record,” while The Times wrote in its Thursday story that “the past three days were quite likely the hottest in Earth’s modern history.”

https://climatechangedispatch.com/noaa-throws-cold-water-on-hysterical-claims-of-hottest-days-on-record/
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 48,301
Quote
NOAA said Thursday that the Reanalyzer’s data is not a suitable substitute for observational data, since the Reanalyzer depends in part on unverifiable outputs, according to The Associated Press.

Indeed.