Yes, like I said -- there needs to be some kind of proof and that means that others need to come forward and testify what they saw or heard personally -- not just hearsay. Then it still boils down to his word against theirs unless there are recordings.
That's right. Actionable proof. Recordings... bastard kids... Shoot, even a hotel room. SOMETHING.
And even at that, how does one defend against a charge made YEARS past? That's the thing that is nonsense. Do you know for a sustainable fact where you were 30 years ago? What EXACTLY you did on any given day? What witnesses could you call forward? What receipts to show your whereabouts?
Everything is so far down the memory hole that without the Blue Dress, NONE of it could be proven. And there ain't a Blue Dress, or they'd have used it long before now.
It's gonna be bullshit.