Author Topic: Trump Case Rocked by Accusation Against DA – Legal Expert Claims Trump’s Constitutional Rights Were  (Read 519 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 176,809
Trump Case Rocked by Accusation Against DA – Legal Expert Claims Trump’s Constitutional Rights Were Violated
By Adam Casalino|April 6, 2023
 
What’s Happening:
It looks like Democrats are putting all their eggs in DA Bragg’s basket. The liberal district attorney has charged Donald Trump with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records with the intent to commit another crime.

Most legal experts have dismissed the validity of the case. But it is unclear if the judge will throw it out or if a jury will actually convict a former president on such flimsy charges. Bragg is convinced Trump was trying to cover up another crime. But what was that crime? Why hasn’t Bragg charged him for that, if it is so critical to this case? He refuses to say. And that might be his undoing.


From Fox News:

Former President Donald Trump’s Sixth Amendment rights may have been violated when New York County District Attorney Alvin Bragg refused to disclose the underlying crime the defendant intended to conceal…

When questioned by a reporter as to what the underlying crime the indictment fails to name is, Bragg replied in New York State, he does not have to.

“The indictment doesn’t specify it because the law does not so require,” he told the journalist

On “Hannity,” Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett forcefully dismissed Bragg’s claim, saying he likely violated Trump’s right to know what he is specifically being accused of.

https://pjnewsletter.com/da-bragg-blindsided-by-accusation-legal-expert/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=pjnewsletter
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address

Online rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 176,809
Constitutional rights?  We ain't got no stinkin Constitution no more, especially in NY. ****slapping
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 48,301
No, this is not the case.  If the matter were to proceed to trial on just the barebones indictment as issued, and provided that Trump made a motion to dismiss the indictment which was denied, and that denial was upheld by the appellate courts, then perhaps a 6th Amendment issue would arise.

Until that time, the standard practice is for Trump to file a request for a Bill of Particulars, to supplement the deficiencies in the indictment in terms of factual allegations, and if the indictment, as supplemented by the bill of particulars, is still deficient, to make a motion to dismiss the indictment.

Let's not jump the gun on this one.

Offline Maj. Bill Martin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,077
  • Gender: Male
  • I'll make Mincemeat out of 'em"
No, this is not the case.  If the matter were to proceed to trial on just the barebones indictment as issued, and provided that Trump made a motion to dismiss the indictment which was denied, and that denial was upheld by the appellate courts, then perhaps a 6th Amendment issue would arise.

Until that time, the standard practice is for Trump to file a request for a Bill of Particulars, to supplement the deficiencies in the indictment in terms of factual allegations, and if the indictment, as supplemented by the bill of particulars, is still deficient, to make a motion to dismiss the indictment.

Let's not jump the gun on this one.

It always amazes me how so many self-described "legal experts" are ignorant when it comes to the law of the state on which they are opining.  Most real lawyers know better, and would never consider giving a client legal advice regarding the law of a state with which the lawyer is not familiar.

Online DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,237
  • Gender: Male
What Constitutional Rights have been violated?  He's getting a jury trial.  That's the due process.

Let this be a lesson for all who make hush money payments to adult models and actresses, don't setup and register your coproration(s) and LLC(s) in New York State.

"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it’s entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." - Alan Simpson, Frontline Video Interview

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 48,301
What Constitutional Rights have been violated?  He's getting a jury trial.  That's the due process.

Let this be a lesson for all who make hush money payments to adult models and actresses, don't setup and register your coproration(s) and LLC(s) in New York State.



Not necessarily.  There is a strong presumption of regularity that attaches to these court proceedings, but that presumption can be rebutted in appropriate circumstances.