Mark Levin Lays Waste to ‘Utterly Useless’ Matt Gaetz and His Gang of ‘Five Boneheads’ Leading Far-R

[mystery-ak]

Mark Levin Lays Waste to ‘Utterly Useless’ Matt Gaetz and His Gang of ‘Five Boneheads’ Leading Far-Right Revolt Against McCarthy
By Ken MeyerNov 30th, 2022, 9:40 am

Conservative radio host Mark Levin went off on the “bonehead” Congressional Republicans threatening to derail Rep. Kevin McCarthy’s (R-CA) bid to be the next speaker of the House.

Levin used his show on Tuesday to talk about how the Republican Party’s slim majority in the House of Representatives may cause a struggle for McCarthy to get the votes he needs to succeed Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Hard-right members of the Congressional GOP have publicly opposed McCarthy’s bid for the speakership, so the House minority leader is currently trying to bring these factions in line and secure the 218 votes he needs.

Levin had no patience for this drama, lashing out at these “five boneheads in the House of Representatives.” He argued that these GOP rebels have no alternative nearly as electable as McCarthy, so they’re “playing right into the hands” of their political foes with this internal squabbling.

“How can they be so stupid?” Levin railed as he blasted these lawmakers for standing in the way of Republican efforts to smoothly implement their agenda. He then proceeded to name and shame these “five saboteurs,” starting with Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL).

more
https://www.mediaite.com/radio/mark-levin-lays-waste-to-utterly-useless-matt-gaetz-and-his-gang-of-five-boneheads-for-leading-far-right-revolt-against-mccarthy/

[libertybele]

I definitely do not like McCarthy, but Levin certainly made his point, though he must realize the importance of putting a conservative in place instead of a RINO.  Is he implying that there is no other good alternative to put in the Speaker's seat other than McCarthy??

[Free Vulcan]

You hold out for concessions. I don't trust McCarthy to keep his promises, but at least put it on the public record.

Of course that all depends on whether they ask for the right stuff.

[libertybele]

You hold out for concessions. I don't trust McCarthy to keep his promises, but at least put it on the public record.

Of course that all depends on whether they ask for the right stuff.

What good does that do??  Granted Trump endorsed him so the Trumpers will think it's a good thing, but many of us know how much of a RINO McCarthy is.  Trump's judgement of people lacks, BIGLY.

[EdinVA]

So wanting a speaker to do the job they asked for is being hard right?
Sounds to me like levin has slipped a cog and lost his focus..

[aligncare]

Interesting, given Levin’s history as a strong defender and proponent of conservative values and principles.

But, here’s the problem.  You can’t govern with those principles and values, until and unless you get enough like minded legislators elected with a majority.  Democrats are good at building majorities because they tenaciously stand behind their principles but slide on their values in order to build up a majority.  That’s when they legislate their principles.

But, republicans fail to remember they’re operating within the distorted bubble of political morality and thus are poor political tacticians.

[Free Vulcan]

What good does that do??  Granted Trump endorsed him so the Trumpers will think it's a good thing, but many of us know how much of a RINO McCarthy is.  Trump's judgement of people lacks, BIGLY.

Because if he doesn't live up to them, then deny him the votes in the committees and on the floor. In a narrow majority they got leverage.

It's always about leverage.

[aligncare]

Because if he doesn't live up to them, then deny him the votes in the committees and on the floor. In a narrow majority they got leverage.

It's always about leverage.

Yep.  All or nothing does not work in politics.  You gotta be in the game to affect the outcome.  President Reagan understood this. He was happy to get 80%, and then fight for the remaining 20.  Among conservatives he was considered to be one of the greatest presidents in history.

[Right_in_Virginia]

Because if he doesn't live up to them, then deny him the votes in the committees and on the floor. In a narrow majority they got leverage.

It's always about leverage.

Yup!  They know they are the minority in this club and they're fighting for their voices to be heard  in an effort to keep their promises to the people who elected them.  I wish them unity, strength and success.

[libertybele]

Yup!  They know they are the minority in this club and they're fighting for their voices to be heard  in an effort to keep their promises to the people who elected them. I wish them unity, strength and success.

Amen!

[Right_in_Virginia]

Amen!

Are you sure?  After all, they're "Trumpers".

[sneakypete]

Let me see,here.

McCarthy was elected in CALIFORNIA,which makes him a "California Republican".

What could possibly go wrong,there?

[sneakypete]

Interesting, given Levin’s history as a strong defender and proponent of conservative values and principles.

But, here’s the problem.  You can’t govern with those principles and values, until and unless you get enough like minded legislators elected with a majority.  Democrats are good at building majorities because they tenaciously stand behind their principles but slide on their values in order to build up a majority.  That’s when they legislate their principles.

But, republicans fail to remember they’re operating within the distorted bubble of political morality and thus are poor political tacticians.

@aligncare

In other words,be kind to and support our leftist masters if we want to get along?

[aligncare]

@aligncare

In other words,be kind to and support our leftist masters if we want to get along?

No, be ruthless at just moments but cunning when necessary.  We either get in the game or sit on the bench and watch our world crumble.

[sneakypete]

No, be ruthless at just moments but cunning when necessary.  We either get in the game or sit on the bench and watch our world crumble.

@aligncare

What I wrote is true in some circumstances,and what you wrote is true in others.

Republican voters need to do some thinking about the candidates they vote for instead of just pulling the lever for the guy with the "R" beside his name.

We all know the Dim Party stands for and supports global communism,and too many of the pols with "R"'s being their name are willing to vote with the commies and make a long-term mistake in order to support a short-term gain with an election coming up.

You do NOT get prepared for "the big dance" by shooting yourself in the foot. IF you are a pol and feel like you need to do that,make damn sure you get something solid in return other than a promise to not put a strong candidate up against you in an upcoming election.

It ain't about YOU,it's about the future of all of us.

[EdinVA]

The "R"'s have to learn to be as ruthless and determined as the socialists or they will get run over and take the rest of us with them.  It will not be enough to "block" but to overturn any and all legislation EO's and regulation that has been put in place over the last 2 years.

[Free Vulcan]

The "R"'s have to learn to be as ruthless and determined as the socialists or they will get run over and take the rest of us with them.  It will not be enough to "block" but to overturn any and all legislation EO's and regulation that has been put in place over the last 2 years.

And they have got to learn to do knifework and make advances one step at a time, do their research, and always always always thinking several moves ahead to be ready with a comeback for whatever they throw at you.

[catfish1957]

I'm about normally 99% aligned with Levin's POV, but his unwavering endorsement of McCarthy is dead wrong.

If McCarthy cared about the country or the GOP he'd yield to either Jordon or Scalise. Our tandems of McC (arthy, onnell) are nothing but feckless complict dim Lites!!!!!!

[catfish1957]

Yup!  They know they are the minority in this club and they're fighting for their voices to be heard  in an effort to keep their promises to the people who elected them.  I wish them unity, strength and success.

Well put....   The Freedom Caucus needs to hold strong, and force McCarthy out. 

[roamer_1]

Well put....   The Freedom Caucus needs to hold strong, and force McCarthy out.

I don't think they have the numbers for that. I think this is maneuvering in order to wedge some conservative planks into the game. I think that's all they can do.

[catfish1957]

I don't think they have the numbers for that. I think this is maneuvering in order to wedge some conservative planks into the game. I think that's all they can do.

If they could set a fire under about 15- 20 ideological stablemates, it could be done.  But alas, gonads are in short supply in most of the GOP.

[roamer_1]

If they could set a fire under about 15- 20 ideological stablemates, it could be done.  But alas, gonads are in short supply in most of the GOP.

Sure. But outside of Freedom Caucus and a handful of senators, all are RINOs. 

[Free Vulcan]

I think that's all they can do.

Agree. The biggest part of this is being realistic, getting what you can, stopping what you can. A narrow majority gives them some leverage, I just hope they are smart enough to know how to use it.

[catfish1957]

Agree. The biggest part of this is being realistic, getting what you can, stopping what you can. A narrow majority gives them some leverage, I just hope they are smart enough to know how to use it.

What is most sad and troubling of all, is that under every guideline, the GOP failed miserably in picking up seats November 8th.

You'd think McCarthy as leader should shoulder some blame for this failure.  But instead we get more of the same the shit, and no accountibility.  Why reward failure?  Is that too much to ask?

[Smokin Joe]

The "R"'s have to learn to be as ruthless and determined as the socialists or they will get run over and take the rest of us with them.  It will not be enough to "block" but to overturn any and all legislation EO's and regulation that has been put in place over the last 2 years.

Two years? I want to go back to policies much older than that. Fourteen years (Obamacare lives) is a good start.