Ketanji Brown Jackson's Supreme Court confirmation hearing | LIVE on March 21 at 10:30 a.m. ET

[Right_in_Virginia]

Will Chamberlain
@willchamberlain

These RINOs have been bluffed off the child porn issue, they aren’t touching it

Instead they are asking questions that are either irrelevant or unanswerable

12:16 PM · Mar 22, 2022·Twitter for iPhone

[Right_in_Virginia]

Mike Davis
@mrddmia

With high-speed internet and smartphones all around world, it’s now much easier to make, share, and view videos of child rape (yes, child porn is child rape).

This led to an explosion of internet child porn since 2010.

We need *more deterrence.*

Longer—not shorter—sentences.

10:46 AM · Mar 22, 2022    Twitter for iPad

[mystery-ak]

Graham gets combative with Jackson: 'What faith are you, by the way?'

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Tuesday grew increasingly combative in his line of questioning of Ketanji Brown Jackson, asking President Biden’s Supreme Court nominee about her religious faith, her defense of Guantánamo Bay prisoners and whether she was aware of what he said were left-wing attacks on his preferred nominee to the court.

Graham has been seen as a swing GOP vote on Jackson given his support for previous Democratic judicial nominees, but he has signaled he is likely to vote “no” on this nomination.

The Republican senator has also made it clear he disliked Democratic questioning during confirmation hearings for former President Trump's Supreme Court nominees and has repeatedly sought to underscore a double standard in how nominees from different presidents are treated.


Graham opened his questioning by asking Jackson abruptly about her faith.

“What faith are you, by the way?” he asked. 

When she responded she is a nondenominational protestant, Graham then asked: “Could you fairly judge a Catholic?” 

more
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/599208-graham-gets-combative-with-jackson-what-faith-are-you-by-the-way

[Right_in_Virginia]

BowTiedRanger
@BowTiedRanger

Leftists view criminals as victims.

1:28 PM · Mar 22, 2022·Twitter for iPhone

[Right_in_Virginia]

Jack Posobiec
@JackPosobiec

Lindsey Graham said he would personally assassinate Putin but he isn't enough tough enough to ask a single question of KBJ's record on child porn

This is RINO mentality

12:38 PM · Mar 22, 2022·Twitter Web App

[Right_in_Virginia]

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene
@RepMTG

There is not a voter in the country, let alone a parent that wants a judge that will go easy on child predators.

12:29 PM · Mar 22, 2022   Twitter for iPhone

[mystery-ak]

Democrat Sen. Dick Durbin Leaps to Defend Ketanji Brown Jackson from Accusations of Leniency in Child Porn Possession Cases

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) leapt to the defense of President Joe Biden’s Supreme Court nominee on the second day of her confirmation hearing.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/03/22/democrat-sen-dick-durbin-leaps-to-defend-ketanji-brown-jackson-from-accusations-of-leniency-in-child-porn-possession-cases/

[mystery-ak]

https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1506349208416120837

[Smokin Joe]

More pathetic than funny. 

The left thinks riding the Wokeness Horse is going to STILL play well with the general public. 
Well we are not too far from that same horse getting a perpetual beating. 

Furthermore, this woman claims she suffered from a segregationist south.  What the hell?   She was born in 1970.  Why isn't just one GOP member asking for an example of WHERE in the south she experienced this after 1975-1980.

Maybe in Boston. They were still burning buses so their kids didn't have to go to school with 'those people' in 1974.

I know Maryland had integrated their schools and done away with jim crow in the 60s.

[mystery-ak]

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1506323234496696324

[Right_in_Virginia]

"Marsha Blackburn EXPOSES Biden Supreme Court pick to her FACE over her support of CRT—"  (Video)

https://mobile.twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1506309814389030921

[Right_in_Virginia]

"Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson refuses to give her opinion on Court Packing"  (Video)

https://mobile.twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1506273884257017868

[Right_in_Virginia]

[Right_in_Virginia]

"WATCH: Senator Cruz goes after Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s record in sentencing child porn offenders."  (Video)

https://mobile.twitter.com/ElectionWiz/status/1506369725051379723

[libertybele]

"WATCH: Senator Cruz goes after Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s record in sentencing child porn offenders."  (Video)

https://mobile.twitter.com/ElectionWiz/status/1506369725051379723

...and she answers "yes I do" in representing the voice of the children though stats show she gave extreme leniency.

[libertybele]

Cruz Challenges Left-Wing SCOTUS Nominee: 'Will You Protect Freedom or Restrict It?'

In his opening statement about Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson before the Senate Judiciary Committee today, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) indirectly alluded to her long history of  left-wing judicial advocacy by raising questions about abortion, gun rights, religious liberty and free speech.

The point of the hearings, he said, is to determine whether Jackson will follow the law -- will she protect freedom or restrict it?

"All of those questions are fair game," said Cruz. "Will you follow the law? What does your record indicate? Will you protect the rights of every American citizen regardless of race, regardless of party, regardless of view? That’s what the focus of this hearing should be."

According to the conservative website The Federalist, "As a result of her work, Jackson has earned the favor of several pro-abortion, pro-LGBT, anti-religious liberty activist groups including The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, which is composed of problematic organizations including the radical Southern Poverty Law Center, the increasingly anti-free-speech American Civil Liberties Union, and Planned Parenthood."

A transcript of part of Cruz's remarks is published below. .....

Sen. Cruz: “… I agree with Chairman [Dick] Durbin. Chairman Durbin quoted [former Senator] Paul Simon and he said, history will judge ‘did she restrict freedom or did she expand it’? I agree with that. The reason the American people care about the Supreme Court is that it is integral to protecting or taking away our constitutional rights.

“When it comes to free speech, this committee should enquire will you protect the rights of Americans to speak, to say unpopular ideas, to say ideas that the government doesn’t want you to say but you, nonetheless, have a right to say. Will you protect freedom or restrict it?

“When it comes to religious liberty, will a justice vote to protect your right to live according to your faith and according to your conscience? Or will a justice vote to crush religious liberty and strip those rights away?

“The Second Amendment. Will a justice vote to defend your Second Amendment rights to keep and bear arms, to defend your family, to defend your children? Or will a justice roll over to the Democrats that want to disarm citizens?................

https://www.cnsnews.com/article/washington/michael-w-chapman/cruz-challenges-left-wing-scotus-nominee-will-you-protect

[Right_in_Virginia]

"NEW: Georgetown Day School, where Judge Jackson is a board member, had 2nd graders repeatedly organize "gender-neutral toy stores" to push leftist lessons about gender identity, transgenderism, and "what it means to be non-binary.""  (Video)

https://mobile.twitter.com/itsSpencerBrown/status/1506325082033082373

[Right_in_Virginia]

"Sen. @HawleyMO confronts Judge Jackson on giving a convicted child pornographer a lesser sentence because the victims "were not much younger.   "He was 18. These kids were eight. I don't see in which sense they're 'peers.'" (Video)

https://mobile.twitter.com/XStrategiesLLC/status/1506388709847015426

[Bigun]

Is there a doubt in anyone's mind that this activist judge will soon be a member of SCOTUS?  I don't! And it saddens me greatly.

[Kamaji]

Is there a doubt in anyone's mind that this activist judge will soon be a member of SCOTUS?  I don't! And it saddens me greatly.

Very little doubt, unfortunately.

[Right_in_Virginia]

"AWKWARD: After Ketanji Brown Jackson says CRT doesn’t come up in her work as a judge, Sen. @tedcru pulls up a quote from her describing how it actually does."  (Video)

https://mobile.twitter.com/approject/status/1506357270053011462

[libertybele]

Is there a doubt in anyone's mind that this activist judge will soon be a member of SCOTUS?  I don't! And it saddens me greatly.

As much as the Senate hearings are pointing out her liberal biases, she'll be confirmed.  So why even hold the hearings when they will do little to alter the outcome anyways?  I guess a formality to make it appear that there's some true opposition.

[catfish1957]

Is there a doubt in anyone's mind that this activist judge will soon be a member of SCOTUS?  I don't! And it saddens me greatly.

She'll ride the race card right in like flint.

They really had some red meat to attack he on the Pedo-crime, but don't forget....   this is the feckless GOP.

[Smokin Joe]

Not only is this nominee unsuitable for the SCOTUS the whole process should be halted.

There is no current vacancy on the bench.
'Filling' a vacancy that does not exist only opens the way to court packing.

This entire farce is putting the manure wagon ahead of the horse.

[Bigun]

Not only is this nominee unsuitable for the SCOTUS the whole process should be halted.

There is no current vacancy on the bench.
'Filling' a vacancy that does not exist only opens the way to court packing.

This entire farce is putting the manure wagon ahead of the horse.

  Absolutely! 

[Right_in_Virginia]

Paul Kane
@pkcapitol

Romney tells me that child-porn angle via Hawley/Cruz is wrong, won't impact how he votes.

“It struck me that it was off course, meaning the attacks were off course that came from some. And there is no there, there.”

Still might vote against KBJ.

5:23 PM · Mar 22, 2022   Twitter Web App

[libertybele]

Not only is this nominee unsuitable for the SCOTUS the whole process should be halted.

There is no current vacancy on the bench.
'Filling' a vacancy that does not exist only opens the way to court packing.

This entire farce is putting the manure wagon ahead of the horse.

This is true, although Breyer said that he would retire at the end of his term, provided that a nominee was appointed and confirmed to replace him.

However, what if Breyer changes his mind?  Then we have 10 on the bench.  Not unless there's some legality that if he said he was going to retire that he has to??

[Right_in_Virginia]

Josh @HawleyMO: "[Y]ou go on to say, 'sex offenders are truly shunned in our society.' I'm just trying to figure out, judge, is he the victim here? Or the victims are the victims? You're saying that you're apologizing to him. You're...sorry for the anguished this has caused him"  (Video)

https://mobile.twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1506386007981178891

[Kamaji]

Not only is this nominee unsuitable for the SCOTUS the whole process should be halted.

There is no current vacancy on the bench.
'Filling' a vacancy that does not exist only opens the way to court packing.

This entire farce is putting the manure wagon ahead of the horse.

Breyer was confirmed before there was a vacancy as well.  Given Breyer's stated intent to retire, this is not a completely novel situation.

[Kamaji]

This is true, although Breyer said that he would retire at the end of his term, provided that a nominee was appointed and confirmed to replace him.

However, what if Breyer changes his mind?  Then we have 10 on the bench.  Not unless there's some legality that if he said he was going to retire that he has to??

There will never be 10 on the bench until and unless the statute governing the composition of the Supreme Court is changed.  Even if she is confirmed, she won't be a justice until she has been given the oath of office, and she cannot be seated so long as there are already nine justices serving.

[mystery-ak]

 

Published March 22, 2022 2:46pm EDT
Supreme Court nominee Jackson doesn't 'quite remember the basis' for Dred Scott decision
The Dred Scott case is among the most notorious in the Supreme Court's history

By Ronn Blitzer | Fox News

    Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, who President Biden nominated to the Supreme Court to become the first ever Black female justice, admitted Tuesday that she could not recall the basis for the infamous Dred Scott decision, which in 1857 said that a Black person whose ancestors had been slaves could not be an American citizen.

The case came up during Jackson’s confirmation hearing on Tuesday, when she faced questioning from Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. Cornyn brought up the concept of substantive due process, a legal doctrine utilized to expand the Constitution’s due process clause to protect various rights not enumerated in the Constitution.

"Why isn't substantive due process just another way for judges to hide their policy making under the guise of interpreting the Constitution," Cornyn said, criticizing the doctrine.

more
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-nominee-jackson-dred-scott-decision-basis

[mystery-ak]

TheLeoTerrell
@TheLeoTerrell
·
3h
Justice Jackson is hiding her support  for Critical Race Theory. Shameful!




TheLeoTerrell
@TheLeoTerrell
·
2h
Not a single Republican should vote for confirmation .

[libertybele]

There will never be 10 on the bench until and unless the statute governing the composition of the Supreme Court is changed.  Even if she is confirmed, she won't be a justice until she has been given the oath of office, and she cannot be seated so long as there are already nine justices serving.

No. There is no provision in the Constitution that states that there can only be 9 justices on the bench.  The Constitution does not define how many.

The Constitution grants that power to Congress.

[Kamaji]

No. There is no provision in the Constitution that states that there can only be 9 justices on the bench.  The Constitution does not define how many.

The Constitution grants that power to Congress.

The statute that governs the Supreme Court does, however.

28 U.S.C. §1:  "The Supreme Court of the United States shall consist of a Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate justices, any six of whom shall constitute a quorum."

As I count it, that makes 9.  No more, and no less.


Source:  https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1

[Cyber Liberty]

No. There is no provision in the Constitution that states that there can only be 9 justices on the bench.  The Constitution does not define how many.

The Constitution grants that power to Congress.

ICYMI, this was why she was asked about (and refused to answer) questions about stacking the court.

And @Kamaji is correct, the number of Justices is in a Statute, and the Constitution specifically places the power to determine the size of the SCOTUS (and all inferior courts.  That will come up later) in the hands of Congress.

[libertybele]

ICYMI, this was why she was asked about (and refused to answer) questions about stacking the court.

And @Kamaji is correct, the number of Justices is in a Statute, and the Constitution specifically places the power to determine the size of the SCOTUS (and all inferior courts.  That will come up later) in the hands of Congress.

The Judiciary Act of 1869 fixed the number of Justices at nine and no subsequent change to the number of Justices has occurred, but again, there is nothing in the Constitution, specifying the number of justices.

Yes, as I mentioned earlier, the power to set the number of justices is in the hands of Congress and unfortunately they have their eye on packing the courts.

[Cyber Liberty]

The Judiciary Act of 1869 fixed the number of Justices at nine and no subsequent change to the number of Justices has occurred, but again, there is nothing in the Constitution, specifying the number of justices.

Yes, as I mentioned earlier, the power to set the number of justices is in the hands of Congress and unfortunately they have their eye on packing the courts.

Democrats always try this when they don't get their way in court.  FDR was big on the notion.

[Smokin Joe]

This is true, although Breyer said that he would retire at the end of his term, provided that a nominee was appointed and confirmed to replace him.

However, what if Breyer changes his mind?  Then we have 10 on the bench.  Not unless there's some legality that if he said he was going to retire that he has to??

IIRC, the number of justices is statutorily limited to nine. Confirming another justice without an opening is begging for a Constitutional crisis--and who is to rule on that?

[Kamaji]

IIRC, the number of justices is statutorily limited to nine. Confirming another justice without an opening is begging for a Constitutional crisis--and who is to rule on that?

Breyer was confirmed before Blackmun retired.  I don’t recall there being much of a constitutional crisis back then. 

[mystery-ak]

Pre K-12 School Where Judge Jackson Sits on Board Pushes Cultural Marxism on Kids

Georgetown Day School, the private Pre K-12 school where Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson sits on the board of trustees, teaches radical critical theory pedagogy, and boasts on its website “everyone will engage in the work of social justice within all aspects of school life” — which Judge Jackson would be required to “support” and “promote” as a member of the board.

more
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/03/23/pre-k-12-school-where-judge-jackson-sits-on-board-pushes-cultural-marxism-on-kids/

[mystery-ak]

CNN’s Lemon: ‘Intellectual Giant’ KBJ Was Questioned by Senators Who Don’t Know Law

On Tuesday, on his show “Don Lemon Tonight,” CNN anchor Don Lemon said that the U.S. Senators who were questioning Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson during the second day of her confirmation hearings had “no idea about the law.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/03/22/cnns-lemon-intellectual-giant-kbj-was-questioned-by-senators-who-dont-know-law/

[Kamaji]

CNN’s Lemon: ‘Intellectual Giant’ KBJ Was Questioned by Senators Who Don’t Know Law

On Tuesday, on his show “Don Lemon Tonight,” CNN anchor Don Lemon said that the U.S. Senators who were questioning Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson during the second day of her confirmation hearings had “no idea about the law.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/03/22/cnns-lemon-intellectual-giant-kbj-was-questioned-by-senators-who-dont-know-law/

Apparently, neither does she.

[mystery-ak]

March 23, 2022 8:15am EDT
Lindsey Graham: Ketanji Brown Jackson was top choice of 'every nutjob liberal group'

Graham questions whether Biden SCOTUS nominee is 'neutral observer' of law

more
https://www.foxnews.com/media/ketanji-brown-jackson-lindsey-graham-ingraham-angle-reaction

[catfish1957]

CNN’s Lemon: ‘Intellectual Giant’ KBJ Was Questioned by Senators Who Don’t Know Law

Someone needs to tell Lemon that even left wing Harvard Professor Alan Dersowicz called Ted Cruz the best constitutional scholar that he had ever seen.

[mystery-ak]

Fierce exchange rages as Republicans confront Dems for withholding SCOTUS nom documents
March 23, 2022 | Kevin Haggerty

The Senate Judiciary Committee grew fervent when Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and several colleagues accused the chairman, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), and his party of withholding records of Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson and demanded to know, “is there anything else that Democrats have access to in this case that they’re not sharing with Republicans?”

Prior to taking the last break from questioning for the second day of the confirmation hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) had brought up information regarding probation reports that had not been submitted to the record. When the committee returned from recess, Cruz reiterated his concern before normal order could resume.

“I asked the chairman about Senator Hirono had referenced five probation reports that were not in the record,” Cruz stated. “I asked the chairman whether the Democrats had access to information about Judge Jackson’s judicial record that Republicans did not. You did not answer me at the time.”

more
https://www.bizpacreview.com/2022/03/23/fierce-exchange-rages-as-republicans-confront-dems-for-withholding-scotus-nom-documents-1216054/

[Kamaji]

Fierce exchange rages as Republicans confront Dems for withholding SCOTUS nom documents
March 23, 2022 | Kevin Haggerty

The Senate Judiciary Committee grew fervent when Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and several colleagues accused the chairman, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), and his party of withholding records of Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson and demanded to know, “is there anything else that Democrats have access to in this case that they’re not sharing with Republicans?”

Prior to taking the last break from questioning for the second day of the confirmation hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) had brought up information regarding probation reports that had not been submitted to the record. When the committee returned from recess, Cruz reiterated his concern before normal order could resume.

“I asked the chairman about Senator Hirono had referenced five probation reports that were not in the record,” Cruz stated. “I asked the chairman whether the Democrats had access to information about Judge Jackson’s judicial record that Republicans did not. You did not answer me at the time.”

more
https://www.bizpacreview.com/2022/03/23/fierce-exchange-rages-as-republicans-confront-dems-for-withholding-scotus-nom-documents-1216054/

Republicans should stop the hearings until the democrats have made a full and complete accounting for all documents and information in their possession.

[Cyber Liberty]

Republicans should stop the hearings until the democrats have made a full and complete accounting for all documents and information in their possession.

If they only had the nerve....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pdh9JhwZ8nc

[Kamaji]

If they only had the nerve....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pdh9JhwZ8nc

Or the brains, or the heart.

[mystery-ak]

Judge Nominated To Supreme Court On The Basis Of Her Sex Can’t Define ‘Woman’
By: Jordan Boyd
March 23, 2022

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, who was nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court by President Joe Biden in large part because of her sex, said she couldn’t define what a woman is on Tuesday during her confirmation hearings.

Jackson was chosen to replace retiring Justice Stephen Breyer in fulfillment of Biden’s identity politics pledge to install a black woman on the Supreme Court. Despite those reasons for her nomination, Jackson stumbled through giving a definition of “woman” when Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn asked the straightforward question.

“Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman’?” Blackburn asked during the hearing.

“No, I can’t,” Jackson said after confirming the question.

The progressive judge claimed she was unable to provide a definition because “I’m not a biologist.”

“The meaning of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can’t give me a definition?” Blackburn pressed.

more
https://thefederalist.com/2022/03/23/judge-nominated-to-supreme-court-on-the-basis-of-her-sex-cant-define-woman/

[catfish1957]

1/9th of the SCOTUS is getting ready be the ultimate hot bed of left wing activism.

There is no stopping this train wreck.