Author Topic: Pennsylvania Court Rules Mail-in Voting Unconstitutional, a Win for Election Integrity  (Read 654 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 384,739
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Pennsylvania Court Rules Mail-in Voting Unconstitutional, a Win for Election Integrity

Wendell Husebø 28 Jan 2022

Three conservative judges on a five-court panel struck down Pennsylvania’s 2019 expanded mail-in voting law that reportedly permitted 2.5 million people, the majority of them Democrats, to cast votes in 2020.

Basing their decisions on election laws passed in 1839 and 1923, the court ruled the legislature’s law unconstitutional. Pennsylvania’s constitution would have to be changed to allow mail-in voting, the court held.

“The Pennsylvania Constitution requires a qualified elector to present her ballot in person at a designated polling place on Election Day, except where she meets one of the constitutional exceptions for absentee voting,” the ruling reads.

In 2019, the Republican-controlled legislature voted to permit mail-in ballots for additional reasons, such as illness and physical disability, which the judges deemed unconstitutional under the state constitution.

Gov. Tom Wolf (D) immediately announced he would appeal the decision to the state’s supreme court. “The Administration will immediately appeal this decision to the state Supreme Court and today’s lower court ruling will have no immediate effect on mail-in voting pending a final decision on the appeal,” he said.

The ruling comes as Pennsylvania residents will elect a new governor and a U.S. senator in a hotly contested battle amid a 50-50 split senate. The ruling may impact the November election.

more
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/01/28/pennsylvania-court-rules-mail-in-voting-unconstitutional-a-win-for-election-integrity/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,789
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
This won't survive an appeal to the PA Supreme Court, which is leftist.
But... nice try.

Online libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,011
  • Gender: Female
This won't survive an appeal to the PA Supreme Court, which is leftist.
But... nice try.


We can always hope.  It's a step in the right direction anyways. :shrug:
Romans 12:16-21

Live in harmony with one another; do not be haughty, but associate with the lowly, do not claim to be wiser than you are.  Do not repay anyone evil for evil, but take thought for what is noble in the sight of all.  If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all…do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51,785
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
Quote
Basing their decisions on election laws passed in 1839 and 1923, the court ruled the legislature’s law unconstitutional. Pennsylvania’s constitution would have to be changed to allow mail-in voting, the court held.

And they ruled properly as that is exactly what the Pennsylvania Constitution requires. It will take some very creative reading to overcome that fact.
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,111
So, will this be upheld by the PA Supreme Court?

Online Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,789
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Kamaji:
"So, will this be upheld by the PA Supreme Court?"

As I mentioned above, the PA Supreme Court is dominated by leftists.
They will find SOME way to wiggle and twist this case by which to overturn the lower court's decision.