Why don't they use ivermectin instead? It isn't in short supply. And it eliminates the need to violate the Civil Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment.
At this point the sanctioned use of either Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine use would be to admit that the past 21 months of people dying from little, no, or just the wrong treatment were because these treatments were suppressed, not because they were not effective.
IOW, hundreds of thousands of people have needlessly died of a disease that could have been treated for about $20.00.
In addition to that, the 'need' for the jabs would go away, and for remdesivir, and a host of other expensive and less effective alternatives. Then, too, would the need for panic, lockdowns, and all the totalitarian bullshit based on flawed assumptions.
Government employees would have to actually show up for work, maybe even do something, and this totalitarian gravy train would be over.
Who knows, some of the Karens might get treated like those who collaborated with the Nazis if it were known that it was all unnecessary--and there are no small few who would never hold elective office again.
