Here’s the Stanford Study on Covid Infection Fatality Rates that Big Tech is Censoring

[Hoodat]

Here’s the Stanford Study on Covid Infection Fatality Rates that Big Tech is Censoring

JD Rucker   |   September 2, 2021

Did you hear about the Stanford study conducted by Catherine Axfors and John Ioannidis that showed extremely high recovery rates for anyone under the age of 70? No? Then you’re probably still getting your news from Google, Facebook, Twitter, or mainstream media. They have ignored or even censored the study.

Facebook went so far as to post a ludicrous “fact-check” written by an undergraduate with no scientific background. The article they use to “debunk” the study is older than the study itself.

Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) is arguably the most important statistic to use when making policy. At the very least it’s up there with R0 infectious rates statistics. In short, IFR is the percentage of people who have been infected by a disease who end up dying as a direct or indirect result. It excludes non-relevant deaths; someone whose body shows Covid-19 present after dying from a gunshot wound would not be included in proper IFR statistics (but don’t tell the CDC that because they’re not so sure).

The study shows the elderly are by far the most at-risk from Covid-19, but it also concludes that the statistics used by most governments are exaggerated. As for anyone under the age of 70, the IFR is very low, under 1% even for 69-year-olds.

Here is a breakdown of IFRs by age group with a distinction made between elderly living in communities and the elderly overall:

• Overall Elderly, 70+: 5.5%
• Elderly in Communities, 70+: 2.4%
• 60-69: 0.59%
• 50-59: 0.27%
• 40-49: 0.082%
• 30-39: 0.031%
• 20-29: 0.014%
• 0-19: 0.0027%

https://uncanceled.news/heres-the-stanford-study-on-covid-infection-fatality-rates-that-big-tech-is-censoring/

[mountaineer]

Those pesky facts.

[Bigun]

 

[Smokin Joe]

Now, take another look at the 0-19 stats.

That rate of .0027 percent, means out of every 100 people under 19, .0027 will die of COVID.

But you can't really just have .0027 of a person die, so multiply your 100 people by 10000 to get a whole number (27) out of every 1,000,000 people aged 0-19 years will die, statistically speaking.

For this, they want to risk life altering (or ending) adverse effects on ALL schoolkids.

[jmyrlefuller]

If these numbers were true, we would have reached herd immunity by now.

[Hoodat]

If these numbers were true, we would have reached herd immunity by now.

These numbers represent fatality rates, not infection rates.

[Kamaji]

Thanks for posting the study!

[Polly Ticks]

Facebook went so far as to post a ludicrous “fact-check” written by an undergraduate with no scientific background. The article they use to “debunk” the study is older than the study itself.

Social Media "fact checks" have become the most prevalent source of (partisan) misinformation out there.  it's quite maddening.

[Bigun]

Social Media "fact checks" have become the most prevalent source of (partisan) misinformation out there.  it's quite maddening.

FB was fact checking me regularly until they got tired of it and deleted my account entirely several months ago.

[Wingnut]

You can see the stacks of bodies from space.

[Smokin Joe]

Social Media "fact checks" have become the most prevalent source of (partisan) misinformation out there.  it's quite maddening.

Not really. It is now (for me) a flag that there may be some actual truth contained in the original content.

[Polly Ticks]

Not really. It is now (for me) a flag that there may be some actual truth contained in the original content.

 

[Cyber Liberty]

If these numbers were true, we would have reached herd immunity by now.

The CDC changed their definition of "herd immunity."  Used to be, natural immunity from prior exposure/infection was considered part of the equation, but now you are assumed to have no immunity unless you got the DNA-altering shot(s).

[catfish1957]

These numbers represent fatality rates, not infection rates.

Exactly, what the CDC told me back in the late '70's is that herd immunity is when infection vectors are isolated because of immune people (vaccinated +natural immunity + acquired immunity via prior infection) So isolated to the point, where the disease runs its course and ends because there is no one available to infect.

[DefiantMassRINO]

The numbers that matter are ICU bed occupancy.  Those statistics are aggregate percentages that don't necessarily measure the strain on limited ICU resources.

All that death, dying, and stress may longer be worth the paycheck for critical care doctors and nurses.  We could be in for prolonged shortages of critical care medical staff.

[Cyber Liberty]

The numbers that matter are ICU bed occupancy.  Those statistics are aggregate percentages that don't necessarily measure the strain on limited ICU resources.

All that death, dying, and stress may longer be worth the paycheck for critical care doctors and nurses.  We could be in for prolonged shortages of critical care medical staff.

Especially now, with Hospitals and Clinics firing healthcare workers who refuse the jab.

[Smokin Joe]

The numbers that matter are ICU bed occupancy.  Those statistics are aggregate percentages that don't necessarily measure the strain on limited ICU resources.

All that death, dying, and stress may longer be worth the paycheck for critical care doctors and nurses.  We could be in for prolonged shortages of critical care medical staff.

It is a pity the medical community immediately worked so hard to find ways to attempt to discredit early onset treatments that were aimed at preventing hospitalization by stopping the progression of the disease before the patient became critical.
But there's no money in that.

[Kamaji]

It is a pity the medical community immediately worked so hard to find ways to attempt to discredit early onset treatments that were aimed at preventing hospitalization by stopping the progression of the disease before the patient became critical.
But there's no money in that.

Exactly.  If Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, and whatever else has some some benefit, were only able to reduce hospitalizations by 10%, that would be a substantial alleviation of strain on the hospitals.

[catfish1957]

It is a pity the medical community immediately worked so hard to find ways to attempt to discredit early onset treatments that were aimed at preventing hospitalization by stopping the progression of the disease before the patient became critical.
But there's no money in that.

And add the politicization factor too.  In 2016 Biden and Heels up were both blasting Trump's Warp Speed program.
This has been a case study, of how exactly not to handle a pandemic.

[jmyrlefuller]

The CDC changed their definition of "herd immunity."  Used to be, natural immunity from prior exposure/infection was considered part of the equation, but now you are assumed to have no immunity unless you got the DNA-altering shot(s).

Herd immunity SHOULD BE when the virus stops spreading faster with each day—without any restrictions on human behavior—and the virus starts running out of hosts. Clearly there is not a single country in the world that has managed to achieve that with this virus, because people are still getting sick, people are still spreading it, and people are still dying.

(And for bleep's sake, they do not alter DNA. Where do you get this nonsense?)

[catfish1957]

Exactly.  If Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, and whatever else has some some benefit, were only able to reduce hospitalizations by 10%, that would be a substantial alleviation of strain on the hospitals.

I have been using Ivermectin for my dog's heartworn treatement for almost 30 years.  But it needs to be seriously brought up, that there is a lot of data that is showing Ivemac causes convulsions in dogs.  My last English Bulldog died from that malady.  Did the Ivermec cause it?  I have no idea, but anecdotally, I have also read that the rates of convulsion type condtions in dogs has increased in the past number of years.  Are dogs living longer why?  More questions than answers.  With that, you will not catch me trying this shit, unless there aren't any other conventional medical options available.  I hope everyone else has that level of common sense.

Still.....

Considering it has been around that long, it is puzzling that the mfg, hasn't researched other anicllary benefits of the product.....   Or has decided dealing with FDA is a losing battle anyway.  Or...  do the risks to humans outweigh. the benefits.

[Cyber Liberty]

It is a pity the medical community immediately worked so hard to find ways to attempt to discredit early onset treatments that were aimed at preventing hospitalization by stopping the progression of the disease before the patient became critical.
But there's no money in that.

There was a reason for that.  In order to get emergency approval for the DNA-altering jabs, it had to be demonstrated there were no viable treatments for COVID. 

[Smokin Joe]

I have been using Ivermectin for my dog's heartworn treatement for almost 30 years.  But it needs to be seriously brought up, that there is a lot of data that is showing Ivemac causes convulsions in dogs.  My last English Bulldog died from that malady.  Did the Ivermec cause it?  I have no idea, but anecdotally, I have also read that the rates of convulsion type condtions in dogs has increased in the past number of years.  Are dogs living longer why?  More questions than answers.  With that, you will not catch me trying this shit, unless there aren't any other conventional medical options available.  I hope everyone else has that level of common sense.

Still.....

Considering it has been around that long, it is puzzling that the mfg, hasn't researched other anicllary benefits of the product.....   Or has decided dealing with FDA is a losing battle anyway.  Or...  do the risks to humans outweigh. the benefits.

A lot, as with many medications, depends on dosage. Indications are that the regimen reduces severity and duration of infection. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/
Dosages are weight based for humans (and animals), or should be. https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/ivermectin-oral-route/proper-use/drg-20064397
https://covid.us.org/2021/01/28/ivermectin-safe-effective-covid-19/

As with any drug, administering dosages far beyond ordinary clinical levels invites toxicity effects.

However, the drug has been shown to be effective in ordinary clinical dosages.
https://www.acsh.org/news/2021/05/04/who%E2%80%99s-afraid-ivermectin-15529

As always, any medical decisions you make are yours to make. (Your body, your choice).

Documented side effects for humans include: https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-1122/ivermectin-oral/details

MENU

    Drugs & Medications Ivermectin

Ivermectin
Common Brand(S): Stromectol
Generic Name(S): ivermectin
View Free Coupon

    Uses
    Side Effects
    Precautions
    Interactions
    Overdose
    Images
    Reviews (17)

Side Effects

Headache, dizziness, muscle pain, nausea, or diarrhea may occur. If you are being treated for "river blindness" (onchocerciasis), you may experience reactions to the dying parasites during the first 4 days of treatment, including joint pain, tender/swollen lymph nodes, eye swelling/redness/pain, weakness, vision changes, itching, rash, and fever. If any of these effects persist or worsen, tell your doctor or pharmacist promptly.

To reduce dizziness upon standing, get up slowly when rising from a sitting or lying position.

Tell your doctor right away if any of these rare but very serious side effects occur: neck/back pain, swelling face/arms/hands/feet, chest pain, fast heartbeat, confusion, seizures, loss of consciousness.

A very serious allergic reaction to this drug is rare. However, seek immediate medical attention if you notice any symptoms of a serious allergic reaction, including: rash, itching/swelling (especially of the face/tongue/throat), severe dizziness, trouble breathing.

As for Ivermectin in dogs (all all you Bulldog lovers should read this), see this site. https://wagwalking.com/condition/parasitic-drug-ivermectin-poisoning

Any human thinking of taking veterinary ivermectin should know the dosage present in the medication, that human dosages are really small (a 220 lb person would only take a 20 milligram dose in a clinical setting--0.2mg/kg) and that veterinary dosages are much higher, meaning there is a higher concentration of ivermectin in, say, horse Ivermectin, so the body weight does not translate pound for pound in figuring out dosages if a human was going to take the horse medicine. Needless to say, the CDC and FDA do not recommend any medication for COVID, and are pushing the vax. THe reason, they claim is that there has not been enough study of the medications they would not be allowed to be used by clinicians and pharmacists for COVID treatment or prevention, which reeks of circular reasoning, but that's their stance. Reports from other countries indicate the use of a number of different zinc ionophores including Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, Quercetin, or Epigallocatechin-gallate (EGCG), in conjunction with a macrolide antibiotic and supplements (50mg zinc, 1000mg Vitamin C, and 5000iu Vitamin D3) for a 7 day period have reduced duration and severity of COVID, often preventing the need for hospitalization or duration thereof.

[catfish1957]

https://wagwalking.com/condition/parasitic-drug-ivermectin-poisoning

Thanks...  Years of schooling and lab work, has made me pretty accurate and careful admininstering any kind of dosage through the years.  Given that, and the age our my present Bully, I think I might slightly adjust the dosage downward.  At her age, it might be at the point that the Ivemec is more of a risk than the Heartworms.

And note to other Briefers....  you really got to be careful and accurate when you prep the solution.  If you aren't good at this kind of thing, it is just a better idea to leave it to your veternarian.

[Hoodat]

Herd immunity SHOULD BE when the virus stops spreading faster with each day—without any restrictions on human behavior—and the virus starts running out of hosts.

The virus now has plenty of hosts, thanks to the mRNA jab.  Bodies incapable of developing antibodies against a virus they can't recognize, thanks to an engineered coat placed on those spike proteins.  And as long as that coat remains intact, the hosts can carry the virus long term.  Only when the virus is able to shed that coat and infect the cells will the body be able to create antibodies against it and join the immunity herd.