0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Very few men are wise by their own counsel, or learned by their own teaching; for he that was only taught by himself had a fool to his master.
It is not so important to know everything as to know the exact value of everything, to appreciate what we learn, and to arrange what we know.
Neither biology nor physiology are the science, nor even branchesof the Science of Life, but only that of the appearances of life. While truephilosophy stands Oedipus-like before the Sphinx of life, hardly daringto utter the paradox contained in the answer to the riddle propounded,materialistic science, as arrogant as ever, never doubting its ownwisdom for one moment, biologises itself and many others into thebelief that it has solved the awful problem of existence. In truth,however, has it even so much as approached its threshold? It is not,surely, by attempting to deceive itself and the unwary in saying that lifeis but the result of molecular complexity, that it can ever hope to promote the truth.
Wisdom and goodness to the vile seem vile.
The best index to a person's character is how he treats people who can't do him any good, and how he treats people who can't fight back.
How grand indeed shines the light of truth upon the face of the man whose heart is enlightened by the sense of his oneness with all; and what pathos there is when the sense of separateness drives him away from his oneness with other men.
11. Those who mistake the unessential to be essential and the essential to be unessential, dwelling in wrong thoughts, never arrive at the essential.12. Those who know the essential to be essential and the unessential to be unessential, dwelling in right thoughts, do arrive at the essential.
3:9 They that trust in him, shall understand the truth: and they that are faithful in love shall rest in him: for grace and peace is to his elect.10 But the wicked shall be punished according to their own devices: who have neglected the just, and have revolted from the Lord.
Now the tree of life is Virtue in the most comprehensive sense, which some term Goodness. From it the particular virtues derive their existence.
The common and vulgar love for boys, not only robs men of courage, the virtue most useful for life in peace as well as war, but produces in their souls the disease of effeminacy and renders androgynous those who should have been trained in all the pursuits making for valor. And having ruined their years of boyhood, and degraded them to the class and condition of sex objects, it injures the lovers, too, in the most essential respects, body, mind, and property. For the mind of the boy-lover is necessarily aimed at his darling, and is keen-sighted for him only, blind to all other interests, private and public.
Those things on which philosophy has set its seal are beyond the reach of injury; no age will discard them or lessen their force, each succeeding century will add somewhat to the respect in which they are held; for we look upon what is near us with jealous eyes, but we admire what is further off with less prejudice. The wise man's life, therefore, includes much; he is not hedged in by the same limits which confine others; he alone is exempt from the laws by which mankind is governed; all ages serve him like a god. If any time be past he recalls it by his memory, if it be present he uses it, if it be future he anticipates it; his life is a long one because he concentrates all times into it.
“A book is a word spoken into creation. Its message goes out into the world. It cannot be taken back,” Michael O’Brien warned as well as assured in his magisterial novel, Sophia House. Just as each word is a reflection of The Word (Logos), so each book is a reflection of The Book. While Christians have come to have a sort of monopoly on The Word and its greatest meaning and exemplar, others—such as the Stoics—embraced the Logos as well. And, while Christians have also come to have a sort of monopoly on The Book, others—such as the Stoics—embraced a variety of works. Here are ten books written by non-Stoics that greatly influenced Stoicism.
Just as on a dark night black with clouds,The sudden lightning glares and all is clearly shown,Likewise rarely, through the Buddhas’ power,Virtuous thoughts rise, brief and transient, in the world.Virtue, thus, is weak; and alwaysEvil is of great and overwhelming strength.Except for perfect bodhichitta,What other virtue is there that can lay it low.
Truth is the Voice of Nature and of time—Truth is the startling monitor within us—Naught is without it, it comes from the stars,The golden sun, and every breeze that blows...
“Any fool can know. The point is to understand.” ― Albert Einstein
The world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it ~ Albert Einstein
Truth eludes us if we do not concentrate with total attention on its pursuit. And even while it eludes us, theillusion still lingers of knowing it, and that leads to many misunderstandings.
The Buddha has taught that there are three roots of evil: greed, hatred and delusion. These three states comprise the entire range of evil, whether of lesser or greater intensity, from a faint mental tendency to the coarsest manifestations in action and speech. In whatever way they appear, these are the basic causes of suffering.These roots have their opposites: non-greed, non-hatred and non-delusion. These are the three roots of good: of all acts of unselfishness, liberality and renunciation; of all expressions of loving kindness and compassion; of all achievements in knowledge and understanding.These six mental states are the roots from which everything harmful and beneficial sprouts. They are the roots of the Tree of Life with its sweet and bitter fruits.Greed and hatred, maintained and fed by delusion, are the universal impelling forces of all animate life, individually and socially. Fortunately, the roots of good also reach into our world and keep the forces of evil in check, but the balance is a precarious one needing to be preserved by constant watchfulness and effort. On the level of inanimate nature, too, we find counterparts to greed and hatred in the forces of attraction and repulsion, kept in their purposeless reactive movement by inherent nescience which cannot provide a motive for cessation of the process. Thus, through an unfathomable past, the macrocosm of nature and the microcosm of mind have continued their contest between attraction and repulsion, greed and hatred; and unless stopped by voluntary effort and insight, they will so continue for aeons to come. This cosmic conflict of opposing energies, unsolvable on its own level, is one aspect of dukkha (unsatisfactoriness): the ill of restless, senseless movement as felt by a sensitive being.
Where would there be leather enough to cover the entire world?The earth is covered over merely with the leather of my sandals.Likewise, I am unable to restrain external phenomena, but I shallrestrain my own mind. What need is there to restrain anything else?
The same question stands open from the days of Socrates and Pilate down to our own age of wholesale negation: is there such a thing as absolute truth in the hands of any one party or man? Reason answers, “there cannot be.” There is no room for absolute truth upon any subject whatsoever, in a world as finite and conditioned as man is himself. But there are relative truths, and we have to make the best we can of them.In every age there have been Sages who had mastered the absolute and yet could teach but relative truths. For none yet, born of mortal woman in our race, has, or could have given out, the whole and the final truth to another man, for every one of us has to find that (to him) final knowledge in himself. As no two minds can be absolutely alike, each has to receive the supreme illumination through itself, according to its capacity, and from no human light. The greatest adept living can reveal of the Universal Truth only so much as the mind he is impressing it upon can assimilate, and no more. Tot homines, quot sententiae [as many men, so many opinions] — is an immortal truism.The sun is one, but its beams are numberless; and the effects produced are beneficent or maleficent, according to the nature and constitution of the objects they shine upon. Polarity is universal, but the polariser lies in our own consciousness. In proportion as our consciousness is elevated towards absolute truth, so do we men assimilate it more or less absolutely. But man’s consciousness again, is only the sunflower of the earth. Longing for the warm ray, the plant can only turn to the sun, and move round and round in following the course of the unreachable luminary: its roots keep it fast to the soil, and half its life is passed in the shadow. . . .
Words of wisdom indeed, yet they are hardly sufficient for the success of Mankind.For every Marcus Aurelius there must be a Julius Caesar, a doer and achiever.In life, Behavior measures the difference between success and failure, not intentions.
Now, since truth is a multifaced jewel, the facets of which it is impossible to perceive all at once; and since, again, no two men, howeveranxious to discern truth, can see even one of those facets alike, what canbe done to help them to perceive it? As physical man, limited andtrammelled from every side by illusions, cannot reach truth by the lightof his terrestrial perceptions, we say—develop in you the innerknowledge. From the time when the Delphic oracle said to the enquirer“Man, know thyself,” no greater or more important truth was evertaught. Without such perception, man will remain ever blind to evenmany a relative, let alone absolute, truth. Man has to know himself, i.e.,acquire the inner perceptions which never deceive, before he can masterany absolute truth. Absolute truth is the symbol of Eternity, and no finitemind can ever grasp the eternal, hence, no truth in its fulness can everdawn upon it. To reach the state during which man sees and senses it,we have to paralyze the senses of the external man of clay. This is adifficult task, we may be told, and most people will, at this rate, prefer toremain satisfied with relative truths, no doubt. But to approach eventerrestrial truths requires, first of all, love of truth for its own sake, forotherwise no recognition of it will follow. And who loves truth in this agefor its own sake? How many of us are prepared to search for, accept, andcarry it out, in the midst of a society in which anything that wouldachieve success has to be built on appearances, not on reality, on self-assertion,not on intrinsic value? We are fully aware of the difficulties inthe way of receiving truth. The fair heavenly maiden descends only on a(to her) congenial soil—the soil of an impartial, unprejudiced mind,illuminated by pure Spiritual Consciousness; and both are truly rare dwellers in civilized lands.
Weak as I am in education, but did not Marcus spend most of his time ruling & warring? Certainly an achiever, not a palace philosopher. Anyway, here is more of the article on valuing all kinds of truth:
---------------------------Respectfully, Skull, hardly disparaging your argument, simply pointing out that;Words while powerful, must motivate the mind to achieve, otherwise we are left w/wise ideas to debate.