I believe we are on the same page in many ways.
It's not about what you did....it's about people's perceptions.
And Trump lost control of that narrative (and while he was never going to be called an angel), I believe (please see this is my opinion...we'll never know because we don't get to run the scenario) he could have fared better had he adapted and modified his approach to:
The way he battled with the press (I hate the press)
The way he conducted himself with respect to what was happening (to much hyperbole still......which gets less of a pass when people are dying).
Dropping his battles with Pelosi and reaching to America.
I used to call it a scamdemic......I don't now.....but it does not mean I still don't feel that way.
There is a lot of scam involved, still. Getting a virus through an N-95 mask is like throwing a BB through an open Boxcar door.
People who work with those pathogens work in a negative pressure lab in full suits with piped in air, at a pressure slightly greater than that in the lab in case there's a breach. BSL-4 protocols are so far from wearing a rag across your face and using hand sanitized, it isn't even close.
and lest we forget, Trump's loss of control over the narrative was engineered, too.
He was banned from Twitter.
The significance of that should not be lost,
a sitting President was denied direct access to the Media for the first time in US History.
Aside from all the editing, video with voice over commentary, twisted statements, and the like already being done by the Demomedia, that's the level of outright censorship that was required to keep him from having a major presence.
And the Democrats/communists/globalists, whatever you want to call them, (I like Traitors, although that can be debated), want everyone to think there are no alternatives to their platforms and are doing all they can to suppress the truth.
It's why I commonly link medical journal articles to back up things I have said about COVID here. When the scientific journals become completely compromised, there will be no truth in them and the medical profession, except for the surgeons and osteopaths, will be done as a relevant realm of scientific inquiry, because the politicians will have corrupted the information out there, and the research.
We have seen that with "Climate Science".
We're already seeing some of that in the medical field with statements from the CDC which indicate that chosen behaviour patterns in some populations are "epidemic", be that addiction (a choice, ultimately) or violence (also a choice). while they may be on the rise, that does not mean that either opioids or firearms are diseases--neither is.
Unless there is a lot of pushback by the Doctors against the hijacking of the Medical field for political purposes, the medical field will become useless against disease any time the health of humans comes into conflict with the political aims of those suppressing and distorting the truth.
We saw this in the early assessments of the use of Hydroxychloroquine against COVID, where the use of Hydroxychloroquine was intended to be just one part of a three part regimen against the disease, but only Hydroxychloroquine was tested and the other parts of that regimen were left out, and where the treatment regimen was intended to be an early onset therapy designed to stop the virus from replicating, in the studies was administered to only patients who were hospitalized and even already on a ventilator.
The context of the assessment, and the absence of the full protocol were designed to show treatment as ineffective, and those who were still assessing that treatment were thwarted by the drugs being made unavailable to the degree that those who had on label use prescriptions for Hydroxychloroquine (lupus and Rheumatoid Arthritis, for a couple) were having trouble getting those prescriptions filled.
If doctors protested that treatment of the treatment, the press attacked the doctors.

The Media are public enemy number one.